3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging, and to support self-management, repeated consultations in specialist outpatient care are often required. The emergence of new digital solutions has revolutionized how health care services can be patient centered, providing unprecedented opportunities for flexible, high-quality care. However, there is a lack of studies exploring how the use of digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for flexible specialist care affects diabetes self-management. To provide new knowledge on the relevance of using PROMs in standard care, we have designed a multimethod prospective study.

          Objective

          The overall aim of this protocol is to describe our prospective multimethod observational study designed to investigate digital PROMs in a routine specialist outpatient setting for flexible patient-centered diabetes care (DigiDiaS).

          Methods

          This protocol outlines the design of a multimethod prospective observational cohort study that includes data from electronic health records, self-reported questionnaires, clinical consultation field observations, and individual in-depth interviews with patients and diabetes health care personnel. All patients with type 1 diabetes at a designated outpatient clinic were invited to participate and use the digital PROM implemented in clinical care. Both users and nonusers of the digital PROM were eligible for the prospective study, allowing for a comparison of the two groups. Data were collected at baseline and after 12 months, including self-management as the primary outcome assessed using the Patient Activation Measure, along with the secondary outcomes of digital health literacy, quality of life, health economy, and clinical variables such as glycated hemoglobin.

          Results

          The digital solution was implemented for routine clinical care in the department in November 2021, and data collection for the prospective study started in October 2022. As of September 6, 2023, 84.6% (186/220) of patients among those in the digital PROM and 15.5% (34/220) of patients among the nonusers have consented to participate. We expect the study to have enough participants by the autumn of 2023. With 1 year of follow-up, the results are expected by spring 2025.

          Conclusions

          In conclusion, a multimethod prospective observational cohort study can offer valuable insights into the relevance, effectiveness, and acceptability of digital tools using PROMs in diabetes specialist care. Such knowledge is crucial for achieving broad and successful implementation and use of these tools in a large diabetes outpatient clinic.

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          DERR1-10.2196/52766

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

          Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeholders developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. The process involved a literature review for relevant checklists and research, a Delphi survey of an international panel of experts to guide item selection, and a face to face panel meeting. The resultant 12 item TIDieR checklist (brief name, why, what (materials), what (procedure), who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, how well (planned), how well (actual)) is an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement (item 5) and the SPIRIT 2013 statement (item 11). While the emphasis of the checklist is on trials, the guidance is intended to apply across all evaluative study designs. This paper presents the TIDieR checklist and guide, with an explanation and elaboration for each item, and examples of good reporting. The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

            High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct, reporting, and external review of clinical trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the content and quality of protocols, an international group of stakeholders developed the SPIRIT 2013 Statement (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials). The SPIRIT Statement provides guidance in the form of a checklist of recommended items to include in a clinical trial protocol. This SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides important information to promote full understanding of the checklist recommendations. For each checklist item, we provide a rationale and detailed description; a model example from an actual protocol; and relevant references supporting its importance. We strongly recommend that this explanatory paper be used in conjunction with the SPIRIT Statement. A website of resources is also available (www.spirit-statement.org). The SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper, together with the Statement, should help with the drafting of trial protocols. Complete documentation of key trial elements can facilitate transparency and protocol review for the benefit of all stakeholders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.

              The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most widely used questionnaires assessing subjective psychological well-being. Since its first publication in 1998, the WHO-5 has been translated into more than 30 languages and has been used in research studies all over the world. We now provide a systematic review of the literature on the WHO-5.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                2024
                5 March 2024
                : 13
                : e52766
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Nursing and Health Promotion Faculty of Health Sciences Oslo Metropolitan University – OsloMet Oslo Norway
                [2 ] Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
                [3 ] SDCA-Steno Diabetes Centre, Aarhus Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
                [4 ] Division of Medicine Akershus University Hospital Akershus Norway
                [5 ] Division of Research and Innovation Department of Research Support Service Akershus University Hospital Akershus Norway
                [6 ] The Centre for Senior Citizen Staff Oslo Metropolitan University – OsloMet Oslo Norway
                [7 ] The Intervention Centre Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Astrid Torbjørnsen astridto@ 123456oslomet.no
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-2452
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0828-8582
                https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6790-2361
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2025-6663
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-5826
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-4552
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-8039
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-7902
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-7813
                Article
                v13i1e52766
                10.2196/52766
                10951827
                38441955
                2646fab6-3efc-4158-b96a-76300be5392e
                ©Astrid Torbjørnsen, Ingeborg Spildo, Maria Aadland Mollestad, Annesofie Lunde Jensen, Tone Singstad, Nina Mickelson Weldingh, Pål Joranger, Lis Ribu, Heidi Holmen. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.03.2024.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 14 September 2023
                : 2 December 2023
                : 22 December 2023
                : 11 January 2024
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                patient-reported outcome measures,proms,diabetes mellitus,dm,type 1,patient acceptance of health care,telemedicine,mobile apps,mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article