0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement

      research-article
      1 , , 1
      Philosophy Compass
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Some disagreements concern our most fundamental beliefs, principles, values, or worldviews, such as those about the existence of God, society and politics, or the trustworthiness of science. These are ‘deep disagreements’. But what exactly are deep disagreements? This paper critically overviews theories of deep disagreement. It does three things. First, it explains the differences between deep and other kinds of disagreement, including peer, persistent, and widespread disagreement. Second, it critically overviews two mainstream theories of deep disagreement, the Wittgensteinian account and the Fundamental Epistemic Principle account, before introducing a Hybrid account. Finally, it explores the notion that deep disagreements can be deeper than others.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Epistemic Injustice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evidentialism

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                c.b.ranalli2@vu.nl
                Journal
                Philos Compass
                Philos Compass
                10.1111/(ISSN)1747-9991
                PHC3
                Philosophy Compass
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1747-9991
                26 October 2022
                December 2022
                : 17
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1111/phc3.v17.12 )
                : e12886
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Philosophy Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Chris Ranalli, Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam, 1081 HV The Netherlands.

                Email: c.b.ranalli2@ 123456vu.nl

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-4829
                Article
                PHC312886
                10.1111/phc3.12886
                10077999
                261649be-0acc-4d4a-b7b3-a0e4d87d218c
                © 2022 The Authors. Philosophy Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 23 August 2022
                : 14 October 2021
                : 01 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 18, Words: 10800
                Funding
                Funded by: H2020 European Research Council , doi 10.13039/100010663;
                Award ID: 851613
                Categories
                Epistemology
                Article
                Epistemology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:06.04.2023

                Comments

                Comment on this article