9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Nucleotide Excision Repair Pathway Limits L1 Retrotransposition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Long interspersed elements 1 (L1) are active mobile elements that constitute almost 17% of the human genome. They amplify through a “copy-and-paste” mechanism termed retrotransposition, and de novo insertions related to these elements have been reported to cause 0.2% of genetic diseases. Our previous data demonstrated that the endonuclease complex ERCC1-XPF, which cleaves a 3′ DNA flap structure, limits L1 retrotransposition. Although the ERCC1-XPF endonuclease participates in several different DNA repair pathways, such as single-strand annealing, or in telomere maintenance, its recruitment to DNA lesions is best characterized in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. To determine if the NER pathway prevents the insertion of retroelements in the genome, we monitored the retrotransposition efficiencies of engineered L1 elements in NER-deficient cells and in their complemented versions. Core proteins of the NER pathway, XPD and XPA, and the lesion binding protein, XPC, are involved in limiting L1 retrotransposition. In addition, sequence analysis of recovered de novo L1 inserts and their genomic locations in NER-deficient cells demonstrated the presence of abnormally large duplications at the site of insertion, suggesting that NER proteins may also play a role in the normal L1 insertion process. Here, we propose new functions for the NER pathway in the maintenance of genome integrity: limitation of insertional mutations caused by retrotransposons and the prevention of potentially mutagenic large genomic duplications at the site of retrotransposon insertion events.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition.

          R2 is a non-LTR retrotransposable element that inserts at a specific site in the 28S rRNA genes of most insects. We have expressed the open reading frame of the R2 element from Bombyx mori, R2Bm, in E. coli and shown that it encodes both sequence-specific endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities. The R2 protein makes a specific nick in one of the DNA strands at the insertion site and uses the 3' hydroxyl group exposed by this nick to prime reverse transcription of its RNA transcript. After reverse transcription, cleavage of the second DNA strand occurs. A similar mechanism of insertion may be used by other non-LTR retrotransposable elements as well as short interspersed nucleotide elements.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Active human retrotransposons: variation and disease.

            Mobile DNAs, also known as transposons or 'jumping genes', are widespread in nature and comprise an estimated 45% of the human genome. Transposons are divided into two general classes based on their transposition intermediate (DNA or RNA). Only one subclass, the non-LTR retrotransposons, which includes the Long INterspersed Element-1 (LINE-1 or L1), is currently active in humans as indicated by 96 disease-causing insertions. The autonomous LINE-1 is capable of retrotransposing not only a copy of its own RNA in cis but also other RNAs (Alu, SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA), U6) in trans to new genomic locations through an element encoded reverse transcriptase. L1 can also retrotranspose cellular mRNAs, resulting in processed pseudogene formation. Here, we highlight recent reports that update our understanding of human L1 retrotransposition and their role in disease. Finally we discuss studies that provide insights into the past and current activity of these retrotransposons, and shed light on not just when, but where, retrotransposition occurs and its part in genetic variation. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biology of mammalian L1 retrotransposons.

              L1 retrotransposons comprise 17% of the human genome. Although most L1s are inactive, some elements remain capable of retrotransposition. L1 elements have a long evolutionary history dating to the beginnings of eukaryotic existence. Although many aspects of their retrotransposition mechanism remain poorly understood, they likely integrate into genomic DNA by a process called target primed reverse transcription. L1s have shaped mammalian genomes through a number of mechanisms. First, they have greatly expanded the genome both by their own retrotransposition and by providing the machinery necessary for the retrotransposition of other mobile elements, such as Alus. Second, they have shuffled non-L1 sequence throughout the genome by a process termed transduction. Third, they have affected gene expression by a number of mechanisms. For instance, they occasionally insert into genes and cause disease both in humans and in mice. L1 elements have proven useful as phylogenetic markers and may find other practical applications in gene discovery following insertional mutagenesis in mice and in the delivery of therapeutic genes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genetics
                Genetics
                genetics
                genetics
                genetics
                Genetics
                Genetics Society of America
                0016-6731
                1943-2631
                January 2017
                14 November 2016
                14 November 2016
                : 205
                : 1
                : 139-153
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
                []Department of Structural and Cellular Biology, School of Medicine, Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
                []Tulane Center for Aging, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
                Author notes
                [1]

                Present address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

                [2]

                Present address: Developmental Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065.

                [3]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [4 ]Corresponding author: Tulane Cancer Center, SL66, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail: pdeinin@ 123456tulane.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-8558
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-4544
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1067-3028
                Article
                188680
                10.1534/genetics.116.188680
                5223499
                28049704
                25e32c16-ab6f-46c5-9e7a-94301e23465e
                Copyright © 2017 Servant et al.

                Available freely online through the author-supported open access option.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 February 2016
                : 30 October 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 84, Pages: 15
                Categories
                Investigations
                Genome Integrity and Transmission

                Genetics
                l1 retrotransposon,nucleotide excision repair,target-primed reverse transcription,dna damage,genome stability

                Comments

                Comment on this article