Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-duration head down bed rest as an analog of microgravity: Effects on the static perception of upright

      research-article
      a , b , * , a , c , c , d
      Journal of Vestibular Research
      IOS Press
      Human orientation perception, space flight analog , subjective visual vertical, perceptual upright , head down bed rest, HDBR

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          Humans demonstrate many physiological changes in microgravity for which long-duration head down bed rest (HDBR) is a reliable analog. However, information on how HDBR affects sensory processing is lacking.

          OBJECTIVE:

          We previously showed [ 25] that microgravity alters the weighting applied to visual cues in determining the perceptual upright (PU), an effect that lasts long after return. Does long-duration HDBR have comparable effects?

          METHODS:

          We assessed static spatial orientation using the luminous line test (subjective visual vertical, SVV) and the oriented character recognition test (PU) before, during and after 21 days of 6° HDBR in 10 participants. Methods were essentially identical as previously used in orbit [ 25].

          RESULTS:

          Overall, HDBR had no effect on the reliance on visual relative to body cues in determining the PU. However, when considering the three critical time points (pre-bed rest, end of bed rest, and 14 days post-bed rest) there was a significant decrease in reliance on visual relative to body cues, as found in microgravity. The ratio had an average time constant of 7.28 days and returned to pre-bed-rest levels within 14 days. The SVV was unaffected.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          We conclude that bed rest can be a useful analog for the study of the perception of static self-orientation during long-term exposure to microgravity. More detailed work on the precise time course of our effects is needed in both bed rest and microgravity conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

          When a person looks at an object while exploring it with their hand, vision and touch both provide information for estimating the properties of the object. Vision frequently dominates the integrated visual-haptic percept, for example when judging size, shape or position, but in some circumstances the percept is clearly affected by haptics. Here we propose that a general principle, which minimizes variance in the final estimate, determines the degree to which vision or haptics dominates. This principle is realized by using maximum-likelihood estimation to combine the inputs. To investigate cue combination quantitatively, we first measured the variances associated with visual and haptic estimation of height. We then used these measurements to construct a maximum-likelihood integrator. This model behaved very similarly to humans in a visual-haptic task. Thus, the nervous system seems to combine visual and haptic information in a fashion that is similar to a maximum-likelihood integrator. Visual dominance occurs when the variance associated with visual estimation is lower than that associated with haptic estimation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration.

            Because sensory systems often provide ambiguous information, neural processes must exist to resolve these ambiguities. It is likely that similar neural processes are used by different sensory systems. For example, many tasks require neural processing to distinguish linear acceleration from gravity, but Einstein's equivalence principle states that all linear accelerometers must measure both linear acceleration and gravity. Here we investigate whether the brain uses internal models, defined as neural systems that mimic physical principles, to help estimate linear acceleration and gravity. Internal models may be used in motor contro, sensorimotor integration and sensory processing, but direct experimental evidence for such models is limited. To determine how humans process ambiguous gravity and linear acceleration cues, subjects were tilted after being rotated at a constant velocity about an Earth-vertical axis. We show that the eye movements evoked by this post-rotational tilt include a response component that compensates for the estimated linear acceleration even when no actual linear acceleration occurs. These measured responses are consistent with our internal model predictions that the nervous system can develop a non-zero estimate of linear acceleration even when no true linear acceleration is present.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Navigation in a “Virtual” Maze: Sex Differences and Correlation With Psychometric Measures of Spatial Ability in Humans

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Vestib Res
                J Vestib Res
                VES
                Journal of Vestibular Research
                IOS Press (Nieuwe Hemweg 6B, 1013 BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands )
                0957-4271
                1878-6464
                26 October 2021
                22 July 2022
                2022
                : 32
                : 4
                : 325-340
                Affiliations
                [a ] Centre for Vision Research, York University , Toronto, Canada
                [b ] Department of Psychology, York University , Toronto, Canada
                [c ] Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, York University , Toronto, Canada
                [d ] Institute of Visual Computing, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences , St. Augustin, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Laurence Harris, Dept Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele St. Toronto, ON, CANADA M3J 1P3. Tel.: +1 416 736 2100 x66018; Cell: +1 416 704 9688; E-mail: harris@ 123456yorku.ca .
                Article
                VES210016
                10.3233/VES-210016
                9398091
                34719448
                25c49d45-2319-4976-8f6d-816a5fad6f5a
                © 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License.

                History
                : 22 January 2021
                : 4 October 2021
                Categories
                Research Article

                human orientation perception,space flight analog,subjective visual vertical,perceptual upright,head down bed rest,hdbr

                Comments

                Comment on this article