12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chilean validation of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis-structure questionnaire (OPD-SQ) for personality structure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This is the validation of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis—Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ).

          Methods

          A clinical sample of 399 adults and a nonclinical general population sample of 50 healthy adults completed measures of depression, attachment, psychiatric symptomatology and distress. Internal consistency and concurrent validity were assessed. Test–retest and Reliable Change Index were also calculated, as was the ability of the OPD-SQ to distinguish between the clinical and general population groups.

          Results

          High internal consistencies were found; significant differences between clinical and nonclinical samples, and significant associations with psychiatric symptomatology, depression and psychological distress.

          Conclusion

          The Chilean OPD-SQ has good reliability, and discriminates between clinical and healthy samples.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An Inventory for Measuring Depression

          A. Beck (1961)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

              In 1984, Jacobson, Follette, and Revenstorf defined clinically significant change as the extent to which therapy moves someone outside the range of the dysfunctional population or within the range of the functional population. In the present article, ways of operationalizing this definition are described, and examples are used to show how clients can be categorized on the basis of this definition. A reliable change index (RC) is also proposed to determine whether the magnitude of change for a given client is statistically reliable. The inclusion of the RC leads to a twofold criterion for clinically significant change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gdelaparra@uc.cl
                Journal
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-7283
                13 September 2021
                13 September 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 139
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Psychoanalysis Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.7870.8, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 0406, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, , Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, ; Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077 Santiago, Chile
                [3 ]GRID grid.488997.3, Millenium Institute for Research on Depression and Personality – MIDAP, ; Santiago, Chile
                [4 ]GRID grid.441791.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2179 1719, Faculty of Psychology, , Universidad Alberto Hurtado, ; Santiago, Chile
                [5 ]GRID grid.6190.e, ISNI 0000 0000 8580 3777, University of Cologne, ; Cologne, Germany
                Article
                640
                10.1186/s40359-021-00640-4
                8436439
                34517907
                258c6f4a-31fb-4b18-8980-24f637b8ffea
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 18 January 2021
                : 19 August 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                personality structure,psychodynamic,self-report,operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article