Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Isotopic composition and emission characteristics of CO 2 and CH 4 in glacial lakes of the Tibetan Plateau

      , , , , , , , , ,
      Environmental Research Letters
      IOP Publishing

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Carbon dioxide (CO 2) and methane (CH 4) emissions from freshwater ecosystems are predicted to increase under climate warming. However, freshwater ecosystems in glacierized regions differ critically from those in non-glacierized regions. The potential emissions of CO 2 and CH 4 from glacierized environments in the Tibetan Plateau (TP) were only recently recognized. Here, the first direct measurement of CO 2 and CH 4 emission fluxes and isotopic composition during the spring of 2022 in 13 glacial lakes of the TP revealed that glacial lakes were the previously overlooked CO 2 sinks due to chemical weathering in glacierized regions. The daily average CO 2 flux was −5.1 ± 4.4 mmol m −2 d −1, and the CO 2 consumption could reach 38.9 Gg C-CO 2 yr −1 by all glacial lakes in the TP. This consumption might be larger during summer when glaciers experience intensive melting, highlighting the importance of CO 2 uptake by glacial lakes on the global carbon cycle. However, the studied glacial lakes were CH 4 sources with total emission flux ranging from 4.4 ± 3.3 to 4082.5 ± 795.6 μmol m −2 d −1. The large CH 4 range was attributed to ebullition found in three of the glacial lakes. Low dissolved organic carbon concentrations and CH 4 oxidation might be responsible for the low CH 4 diffusive fluxes of glacial lakes without ebullition. In addition, groundwater input could alter CO 2 and CH 4 emissions from glacial lakes. CH 4 in glacial lakes probably had a thermogenic source; whereas CO 2 was influenced mainly by atmospheric input, as well as organic matter remineralization and CH 4 oxidation. Overall, glacial lakes in the TP play an important role in the global carbon cycle and budget, and more detailed isotopic and microbial studies are needed to constrain the contributions of different pathways to CO 2 and CH 4 production, consumption and emissions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Different glacier status with atmospheric circulations in Tibetan Plateau and surroundings

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation—Isotope evidence

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales.

              Understanding the dynamics of methane (CH4 ) emissions is of paramount importance because CH4 has 25 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) and is currently the second most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas. Wetlands are the single largest natural CH4 source with median emissions from published studies of 164 Tg yr(-1) , which is about a third of total global emissions. We provide a perspective on important new frontiers in obtaining a better understanding of CH4 dynamics in natural systems, with a focus on wetlands. One of the most exciting recent developments in this field is the attempt to integrate the different methodologies and spatial scales of biogeochemistry, molecular microbiology, and modeling, and thus this is a major focus of this review. Our specific objectives are to provide an up-to-date synthesis of estimates of global CH4 emissions from wetlands and other freshwater aquatic ecosystems, briefly summarize major biogeophysical controls over CH4 emissions from wetlands, suggest new frontiers in CH4 biogeochemistry, examine relationships between methanogen community structure and CH4 dynamics in situ, and to review the current generation of CH4 models. We highlight throughout some of the most pressing issues concerning global change and feedbacks on CH4 emissions from natural ecosystems. Major uncertainties in estimating current and future CH4 emissions from natural ecosystems include the following: (i) A number of important controls over CH4 production, consumption, and transport have not been, or are inadequately, incorporated into existing CH4 biogeochemistry models. (ii) Significant errors in regional and global emission estimates are derived from large spatial-scale extrapolations from highly heterogeneous and often poorly mapped wetland complexes. (iii) The limited number of observations of CH4 fluxes and their associated environmental variables loosely constrains the parameterization of process-based biogeochemistry models. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Environmental Research Letters
                Environ. Res. Lett.
                IOP Publishing
                1748-9326
                August 18 2023
                September 01 2023
                August 18 2023
                September 01 2023
                : 18
                : 9
                : 094025
                Article
                10.1088/1748-9326/aceb7b
                258699ed-f282-4901-845d-4cedc73a46a8
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article