The surface energy and surface chemistry of a crystal are of great importance when designing particles for a specific application, as these will impact both downstream manufacturing processes as well as final product quality. In this work, the surface properties of two different quercetin solvates (quercetin dihydrate and quercetin DMSO solvate) were studied using molecular (synthonic) modeling and experimental techniques, including inverse gas chromatography (IGC) and contact angle measurements, to establish a relationship between crystal structure and surface properties. The attachment energy model was used to predict morphologies and calculate surface properties through the study of their growth synthons. The modeling results confirmed the surface chemistry anisotropy for the two forms. For quercetin dihydrate, the {010} facets were found to grow mainly by nonpolar offset quercetin–quercetin stacking interactions, thus being hydrophobic, while the {100} facets were expected to be hydrophilic, growing by a polar quercetin–water hydrogen bond. For QDMSO, the dominant facet {002} grows by a strong polar quercetin–quercetin hydrogen bonding interaction, while the second most dominant facet {011} grows by nonpolar π–π stacking interactions. Water contact angle measurements and IGC confirmed a greater overall surface hydrophilicity for QDMSO compared to QDH and demonstrated surface energy heterogeneity for both structures. This work shows how synthonic modeling can help in the prediction of the surface nature of crystalline particles and guide the choice of parameters that will determine the optimal crystal form and final morphology for targeted surface properties, for example, the choice of crystallization conditions, choice of solvent, or presence of additives or impurities, which can direct the crystallization of a specific crystal form or crystal shape.
The surface properties of two different quercetin solvates were studied using molecular (synthonic) modeling and experimental techniques to establish a relationship between crystal structure and surface properties. For quercetin dihydrate, the dominant {010} facets grow mainly by nonpolar offset quercetin−quercetin stacking interactions, thus being hydrophobic, while for QDMSO, the dominant facet {002} grows by a strong polar quercetin−quercetin hydrogen bonding interaction, thus being more hydrophilic. Water contact angle measurements and IGC verified the modeling calculations and demonstrated surface energy heterogeneity for both structures.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.