15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae: systematic review and meta-analysis

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine associations between Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, spontaneous abortion, premature rupture of membranes, perinatal mortality, low birth weight and ophthalmia neonatorum.

          Data sources

          We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature for studies published between 1948 and 14 January 2020.

          Methods

          Studies were included if they reported testing for NG during pregnancy and compared pregnancy, perinatal and/or neonatal outcomes between women with and without NG. Two reviewers independently assessed papers for inclusion and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using established checklists for each study design. Summary ORs with 95% CIs were generated using random effects models for both crude and, where available, adjusted associations.

          Results

          We identified 2593 records and included 30 in meta-analyses. Women with NG were more likely to experience preterm birth (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.99, n=18 studies); premature rupture of membranes (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.92, n=9); perinatal mortality (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.46, n=9); low birth weight (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.48, n=8) and ophthalmia neonatorum (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.36 to 13.04, n=6). Summary adjusted ORs were, for preterm birth 1.90 (95% CI 1.14 to 3.19, n=5) and for low birth weight 1.48 (95% CI 0.79 to 2.77, n=4). In studies with a multivariable analysis, age was the variable most commonly adjusted for. NG was more strongly associated with preterm birth in low-income and middle-income countries (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.48, n=7) than in high-income countries (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.83, n=11).

          Conclusions

          NG is associated with a number of adverse pregnancy and newborn outcomes. Further research should be done to determine the role of NG in different perinatal mortality outcomes because interventions that reduce mortality will have the greatest impact on reducing the burden of disease in low-income and middle-income countries.

          PROSPERO registration number

          CRD42016050962.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

            Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sex Transm Infect
                Sex Transm Infect
                sextrans
                sti
                Sexually Transmitted Infections
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                1368-4973
                1472-3263
                March 2021
                12 January 2021
                : 97
                : 2
                : 104-111
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentPublic Health Interventions Research Group , Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [2 ] departmentInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM) , University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [3 ] departmentBiostatistics and Databases program , Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [4 ] Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research , Goroka, Papua New Guinea
                [5 ] departmentMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program , Burnet Institute , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [6 ] departmentSurveillance and Evaluation Research , Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [7 ] departmentPublic Health Division , Central Australian Aboriginal Congress , Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia
                [8 ] Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [9 ] departmentSexual and Reproductive Health Unit , Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research , Goroka, Papua New Guinea
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Lisa M Vallely, Kirby Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; lvallely@ 123456kirby.unsw.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-7683
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-0475
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-0475
                Article
                sextrans-2020-054653
                10.1136/sextrans-2020-054653
                7892372
                33436505
                24cce5f5-725e-4f87-a84e-eb6707148067
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 June 2020
                : 28 October 2020
                : 28 November 2020
                Categories
                Review
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Sexual medicine
                neisseria gonorrhoeae,premature birth,meta-analysis,pregnancy,systematic review
                Sexual medicine
                neisseria gonorrhoeae, premature birth, meta-analysis, pregnancy, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article