46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Microplastic ingestion ubiquitous in marine turtles

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite concerns regarding the environmental impacts of microplastics, knowledge of the incidence and levels of synthetic particles in large marine vertebrates is lacking. Here, we utilize an optimized enzymatic digestion methodology, previously developed for zooplankton, to explore whether synthetic particles could be isolated from marine turtle ingesta. We report the presence of synthetic particles in every turtle subjected to investigation ( n = 102) which included individuals from all seven species of marine turtle, sampled from three ocean basins (Atlantic [ATL]: n = 30, four species; Mediterranean (MED): n = 56, two species; Pacific (PAC): n = 16, five species). Most particles ( n = 811) were fibres (ATL: 77.1% MED: 85.3% PAC: 64.8%) with blue and black being the dominant colours. In lesser quantities were fragments (ATL: 22.9%: MED: 14.7% PAC: 20.2%) and microbeads (4.8%; PAC only; to our knowledge the first isolation of microbeads from marine megavertebrates). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT‐IR) of a subsample of particles ( n = 169) showed a range of synthetic materials such as elastomers (MED: 61.2%; PAC: 3.4%), thermoplastics (ATL: 36.8%: MED: 20.7% PAC: 27.7%) and synthetic regenerated cellulosic fibres (SRCF; ATL: 63.2%: MED: 5.8% PAC: 68.9%). Synthetic particles being isolated from species occupying different trophic levels suggest the possibility of multiple ingestion pathways. These include exposure from polluted seawater and sediments and/or additional trophic transfer from contaminated prey/forage items. We assess the likelihood that microplastic ingestion presents a significant conservation problem at current levels compared to other anthropogenic threats.

          Abstract

          Knowledge of the incidence and levels of synthetic particles in large marine vertebrates is lacking. Here, we explore whether synthetic particles could be isolated from marine turtle ingesta and report the presence in every turtle subjected to investigation including individuals from all the seven species of marine turtle, sampled from three ocean basins. Most particles were fibres in lesser quantities were fragments/microbeads and were a range of synthetic materials. Synthetic particles isolated from species occupying different trophic levels suggest the possibility of multiple ingestion pathways. We assess the likelihood this presents a significant conservation problem at current levels.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel.

          Microplastics are present in marine habitats worldwide and laboratory studies show this material can be ingested, yet data on abundance in natural populations is limited. This study documents microplastics in 10 species of fish from the English Channel. 504 Fish were examined and plastics found in the gastrointestinal tracts of 36.5%. All five pelagic species and all five demersal species had ingested plastic. Of the 184 fish that had ingested plastic the average number of pieces per fish was 1.90±0.10. A total of 351 pieces of plastic were identified using FT-IR Spectroscopy; polyamide (35.6%) and the semi-synthetic cellulosic material, rayon (57.8%) were most common. There was no significant difference between the abundance of plastic ingested by pelagic and demersal fish. Hence, microplastic ingestion appears to be common, in relatively small quantities, across a range of fish species irrespective of feeding habitat. Further work is needed to establish the potential consequences. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption

            The ubiquity of anthropogenic debris in hundreds of species of wildlife and the toxicity of chemicals associated with it has begun to raise concerns regarding the presence of anthropogenic debris in seafood. We assessed the presence of anthropogenic debris in fishes and shellfish on sale for human consumption. We sampled from markets in Makassar, Indonesia, and from California, USA. All fish and shellfish were identified to species where possible. Anthropogenic debris was extracted from the digestive tracts of fish and whole shellfish using a 10% KOH solution and quantified under a dissecting microscope. In Indonesia, anthropogenic debris was found in 28% of individual fish and in 55% of all species. Similarly, in the USA, anthropogenic debris was found in 25% of individual fish and in 67% of all species. Anthropogenic debris was also found in 33% of individual shellfish sampled. All of the anthropogenic debris recovered from fish in Indonesia was plastic, whereas anthropogenic debris recovered from fish in the USA was primarily fibers. Variations in debris types likely reflect different sources and waste management strategies between countries. We report some of the first findings of plastic debris in fishes directly sold for human consumption raising concerns regarding human health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill

              Microplastics (plastics <5 mm diameter) are at the forefront of current environmental pollution research, however, little is known about the degradation of microplastics through ingestion. Here, by exposing Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) to microplastics under acute static renewal conditions, we present evidence of physical size alteration of microplastics ingested by a planktonic crustacean. Ingested microplastics (31.5 µm) are fragmented into pieces less than 1 µm in diameter. Previous feeding studies have shown spherical microplastics either; pass unaffected through an organism and are excreted, or are sufficiently small for translocation to occur. We identify a new pathway; microplastics are fragmented into sizes small enough to cross physical barriers, or are egested as a mixture of triturated particles. These findings suggest that current laboratory-based feeding studies may be oversimplifying interactions between zooplankton and microplastics but also introduces a new role of Antarctic krill, and potentially other species, in the biogeochemical cycling and fate of plastic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                b.j.godley@exeter.ac.uk
                Journal
                Glob Chang Biol
                Glob Chang Biol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2486
                GCB
                Global Change Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                04 December 2018
                February 2019
                : 25
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/gcb.2019.25.issue-2 )
                : 744-752
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK
                [ 2 ] College of Life and Environmental Sciences: Biosciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
                [ 3 ] Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Plymouth Marine Laboratory Plymouth UK
                [ 4 ] Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Near East University Nicosia North Cyprus Turkey
                [ 5 ] Society for Protection of Turtles Kyrenia North Cyprus Turkey
                [ 6 ] North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Beaufort North Carolina
                [ 7 ] College of Science and Engineering James Cook University Townsville QLD Australia
                [ 8 ] Department of Environment and Science Threatened Species Unit Brisbane QLD Australia
                [ 9 ] School of Chemistry University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park Norwich UK
                [ 10 ] Greenpeace Research Laboratories, School of Biosciences, Innovation Centre Phase 2 University of Exeter Exeter UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Brendan J. Godley, Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.

                Email: b.j.godley@ 123456exeter.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9516-7097
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-0034
                Article
                GCB14519
                10.1111/gcb.14519
                6849705
                30513551
                24b8aa39-44f9-4305-b4e3-8c5b85a02667
                © 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 August 2018
                : 15 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Pages: 9, Words: 7508
                Funding
                Funded by: British High Commission in Cyprus
                Funded by: British Residents Society of North Cyprus
                Funded by: Erwin Warth Foundation
                Funded by: Kuzey Kıbrıs Turkcell
                Funded by: Karsiyaka Turtle Watch Turtle Watch
                Funded by: MAVA Foundation , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100013324;
                Funded by: Peoples Trust for Endangered Species
                Funded by: Tony and Angela Wadsworth
                Funded by: English School of Kyrenia
                Funded by: Turkish Cypriot Presidency
                Funded by: United States Agency for International Development , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000200;
                Funded by: University of Exeter & Roger de Freitas , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000737;
                Funded by: NERC Discovery Grant , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000270;
                Funded by: Sea Life Trust
                Funded by: EU Seventh Framework Programme , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100011102;
                Award ID: 308370
                Funded by: Darwin Initiative
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000270;
                Award ID: NE/L003988/1
                Award ID: NE/L007010/1
                Categories
                Primary Research Article
                Primary Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:12.11.2019

                anthropogenic debris,marine debris,marine plastic,marine turtle,microplastics,plastic pollution

                Comments

                Comment on this article