7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of additional lead shielding to protect staff from scattering radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often complex and involves long fluoroscopic times, with significant radiation exposure to medical staff. We investigated protective effects of an additional attached lead shielding device. The lead shielding device covered with the X-ray tube table (0.125 mm lead equivalent) during ERCP procedures. Fluoroscopy scatter radiation, with or without the lead shielding device, was measured using an acrylic phantom and a radiation survey meter. Measurements (25 points) were made at 50 cm intervals, at both 90 and 150 cm above the floor. We created radiation maps, with and without the additional lead shielding device. Moreover, we monitored annual staff exposure to radiation, before and after inclusion of the shielding device. Without additional shielding, exposure doses at the physician’s position, 90 and 150 cm above the floor, were 1940 and 4040 (μSv/h) respectively. In contrast, with the shielding device, corresponding exposures were 270 and 450 (μSv/h) at 90 and 150 cm, respectively. Scattered radiation was decreased by 86.1% at 90 cm or 88.9% at 150 cm. However, with additional lead shielding in the middle, rather than hung over the operating table, scattered radiation was decreased by only ~10%. The staff’s annual dose equivalents (DEs) were 12.2–29.8 mSv/year without and 3.8–8.4 mSv/year with lead shielding. With lead shielding, dose equivalent values for the staff were decreased by 41.0–76.5%. Thus, with additional lead shielding, properly used, scattered radiation would be decreased by ~90%, thus decreasing exposure doses to medical staff during ERCPs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Occupational dose in interventional radiology procedures.

          Interventional radiology tends to involve long procedures (i.e., long fluoroscopic times). Therefore, radiation protection for interventional radiology staff is an important issue. This study describes the occupational radiation dose for interventional radiology staff, especially nurses, to clarify the present annual dose level for interventional radiology nurses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Occupational eye dose in interventional cardiology procedures

            It is important to measure the radiation dose [3-mm dose equivalent, Hp(3)] in the eye. This study was to determine the current occupational radiation eye dose of staff conducting interventional cardiology procedures, using a novel direct eye dosimeter. We measured the occupational eye dose [Hp(3)] in physicians and nurses in a catheterization laboratory for 6-months. The eye doses [Hp(3)] of 12 physicians (9 with Pb glasses, 3 without), and 11 nurses were recorded using a novel direct eye dosimeter, the DOSIRISTM. We placed dosimeters above and under the glasses. We also estimated the eye dose [0.07-mm dose equivalent] using a neck personal dosimeter. The eye doses among interventional staff ranked in the following order: physicians without Pb glasses > physicians with Pb glasses > nurses. The shielding effect of the glasses (0.07-mm Pb) in a clinical setting was approximately 60%. In physicians who do not wear Pb glasses, the eye dose may exceed the new regulatory limit for IR staff. We found good correlations between the neck dosimeter dose and eye dosimeter dose (inside or outside glasses, R2 = 0.93 and R2 = 0.86, respectively) in physicians. We recommend that interventional physicians use an eye dosimeter for correct evaluation of the lens dose.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radiation protection in digestive endoscopy: European Society of Digestive Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline.

              This article expresses the current view of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) about radiation protection for endoscopic procedures, in particular endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Particular cases, including pregnant women and pediatric patients, are also discussed. This Guideline was developed by a group of endoscopists and medical physicists to ensure that all aspects of radiation protection are adequately dealt with. A two-page executive summary of evidence statements and recommendations is provided. The target readership for this Guideline mostly includes endoscopists, anesthesiologists, and endoscopy assistants who may be exposed to X-rays during endoscopic procedures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Radiat Res
                J. Radiat. Res
                jrr
                Journal of Radiation Research
                Oxford University Press
                0449-3060
                1349-9157
                March 2018
                02 February 2018
                02 February 2018
                : 59
                : 2
                : 225-232
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, 1-12-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai 983-8512, Japan
                [2 ]Department of Radiological Technology, Tohoku University School of Health Sciences, 2-1 Seiryo Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan
                [3 ]Gastroenterology Center, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, 1-12-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai 983-8512, Japan
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Tel: +81-22-259-1221; Fax: +81-22-259-1232; Email: morishima@ 123456med.tohoku.ac.jp
                Article
                rrx039
                10.1093/jrr/rrx039
                5951079
                29409055
                246764b1-d257-4ed7-9670-79b26dff53c3
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 28 March 2017
                : 06 June 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: JSPS KAKENHI
                Award ID: JP15K01387
                Categories
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,additional lead shielding devices,scattered radiation,physician’s dose,radiation map

                Comments

                Comment on this article