21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and Safety of Vamorolone in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy : A 30-Month Nonrandomized Controlled Open-Label Extension Trial

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , MMed, BS 9 , , MBBS 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , PhD 14 , , MD, PhD 15 , , PhD 15 , , PhD 16 , 17 , , MS 18 , , MS 18 , , PhD 18 , , MD, PhD 18 , , MD 18 , , MD 18 , , PhD 19 , , MS 20 , , MD 16 , , PhD 14 , 21 , , PhD 21 , 22
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This nonrandomized controlled trial examines efficacy of vamorolone treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy among boys compared with glucocorticoid treatment.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is long-term treatment with vamorolone associated with sustained disease modification and decrease of glucocorticoid-associated adverse outcomes among patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)?

          Findings

          In this nonrandomized controlled trial of 46 boys with DMD, higher-dose vamorolone treatment for up to 30 months was not associated with a change in time to stand velocity. Vamorolone was associated with continued disease-modification and similar efficacy compared with glucocorticoid treatment from 2 historical control cohorts, and long-term vamorolone treatment was associated with decreased adverse outcomes compared with traditional glucocorticoid therapy.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that vamorolone may have potential as a standard of care disease-modifying treatment for boys with DMD.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Vamorolone is a synthetic steroidal drug with potent anti-inflammatory properties. Initial open-label, multiple ascending dose-finding studies of vamorolone among boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) found significant motor function improvement after 6 months treatment in higher-dose (ie, ≥2.0 mg/kg/d) groups.

          Objective

          To investigate outcomes after 30 months of open-label vamorolone treatment.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted by the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group at 11 US and non-US study sites. Participants were 46 boys ages 4.5 to 7.5 years with DMD who completed the 6-month dose-finding study. Data were analyzed from July 2020 through November 2021.

          Interventions

          Participants were enrolled in a 24-month, long-term extension (LTE) study with vamorolone dose escalated to 2.0 or 6.0 mg/kg/d.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Change in time-to-stand (TTSTAND) velocity from dose-finding baseline to end of LTE study was the primary outcome. Efficacy assessments included timed function tests, 6-minute walk test, and NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA). Participants with DMD treated with glucocorticoids from the Duchenne Natural History Study (DNHS) and NorthStar United Kingdom (NSUK) Network were matched and compared with participants in the LTE study receiving higher doses of vamorolone.

          Results

          Among 46 boys with DMD who completed the dose-finding study, 41 boys (mean [SD] age, 5.33 [0.96] years) completed the LTE study. Among 21 participants treated with higher-dose (ie, ≥2.0 mg/kg/d) vamorolone consistently throughout the 6-month dose-finding and 24-month LTE studies with data available at 30 months, there was a decrease in mean (SD) TTSTAND velocity from baseline to 30 months (0.206 [0.070] rises/s vs 0.189 (0.124) rises/s), which was not a statistically significant change (−0.011 rises/s; CI, −0.068 to 0.046 rises/s). There were no statistically significant differences between participants receiving higher-dose vamorolone and matched participants in the historical control groups receiving glucocorticoid treatment (75 patients in DNHS and 110 patients in NSUK) over a 2-year period in NSAA total score change (0.22 units vs NSUK; 95% CI, −4.48 to 4.04]; P = .92), body mass index z score change (0.002 vs DNHS SD/mo; 95% CI, −0.006 to 0.010; P = .58), or timed function test change. Vamorolone at doses up to 6.0 mg/kg/d was well tolerated, with 5 of 46 participants discontinuing prematurely and for reasons not associated with study drug. Participants in the DNHS treated with glucocorticoids had significant growth delay in comparison with participants treated with vamorolone who had stable height percentiles (0.37 percentile/mo; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.52 percentile/mo) over time.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This study found that vamorolone treatment was not associated with a change in TTSTAND velocity from baseline to 30 months among boys with DMD aged 4 to 7 years at enrollment. Vamorolone was associated with maintenance of muscle strength and function up to 30 months, similar to standard of care glucocorticoid therapy, and improved height velocity compared with growth deceleration associated with glucocorticoid treatment, suggesting that vamorolone may be an attractive candidate for treatment of DMD.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03038399

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus.

              The protein product of the human Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus (DMD) and its mouse homolog (mDMD) have been identified by using polyclonal antibodies directed against fusion proteins containing two distinct regions of the mDMD cDNA. The DMD protein is shown to be approximately 400 kd and to represent approximately 0.002% of total striated muscle protein. This protein is also detected in smooth muscle (stomach). Muscle tissue isolated from both DMD-affected boys and mdx mice contained no detectable DMD protein, suggesting that these genetic disorders are homologous. Since mdx mice present no obvious clinical abnormalities, the identification of the mdx mouse as an animal model for DMD has important implications with regard to the etiology of the lethal DMD phenotype. We have named the protein dystrophin because of its identification via the isolation of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                25 January 2022
                January 2022
                25 January 2022
                : 5
                : 1
                : e2144178
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
                [2 ]University of Pittsburgh and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [3 ]John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
                [5 ]Nemours Children’s Hospital, Orlando, Florida
                [6 ]St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
                [7 ]Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
                [8 ]Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikvah, Israel
                [9 ]Royal Children’s Hospital and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
                [10 ]The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
                [11 ]University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas
                [12 ]Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
                [13 ]University of California Davis, Sacramento
                [14 ]ReveraGen BioPharma, Rockville, Maryland
                [15 ]Camden Group, St Louis, Missouri
                [16 ]Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [17 ]University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
                [18 ]Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
                [19 ]Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
                [20 ]Santhera Pharmaceuticals, Pratteln, Switzerland
                [21 ]Binghamton University-State University of New York, Binghamton
                [22 ]Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: November 19, 2021.
                Published: January 25, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44178
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2022 Mah JK et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Jean K. Mah, MD, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3B 6A8 ( jean.mah@ 123456ahs.ca ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Dang had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Clemens, Guglieri, Finkel, McDonald, Schwartz, Mengle-Gaw, Leinonen, Hoffman, Dang.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Mah, McDonald, Leinonen, Hoffman, Dang.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mah, Clemens, Guglieri, Smith, Finkel, Tulinius, Nevo, Ryan, Webster, Castro, Kuntz, Damsker, Schwartz, Mengle-Gaw, Jackowski, Stimpson, Ridout, Ayyar-Gupta, Baranello, Manzur, Muntoni, Gordish-Dressman, Leinonen, Ward, Hoffman, Dang.
                Statistical analysis: Stimpson, Gordish-Dressman, Leinonen, Hoffman, Dang.
                Obtained funding: Clemens, Guglieri, Hoffman.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Mah, Clemens, Finkel, Ryan, McDonald, Damsker, Schwartz, Mengle-Gaw, Jackowski, Ayyar-Gupta, Manzur, Ward, Hoffman.
                Supervision: Mah, Clemens, Tulinius, Ryan, Castro, McDonald, Ridout, Baranello, Hoffman.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Mah reported receiving grants from ReveraGen BioPharma during the conduct of the study; grants from Pfizer, Italfarmaco, Sarepta, Catabasis, Roche, Biogen, Novartis, NS Pharma, PTC Therapeutics, and Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation; and personal fees from PTC Therapeutics, Biogen, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Clemens reported serving as a board member for Therapeutic Research in Neuromuscular Disorders Solutions (TRINDS); receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), NS Pharma, Amicus, Sanofi, Spark, and Muscular Dystrophy Association; receiving research support through a donation from the Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne to the University of Pittsburgh; and receiving personal fees from Epirium during the conduct of the study outside the submitted work. Dr Guglieri reported receiving data management support from North Star Network during the conduct of the study; grants from the NIH, European Committee H2020, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy UK, and Sarepta (funding through Translational Research in Europe: Assessment and Treatment of Neuromuscular Disorders); personal fees from Sarepta; and travel fees from Santhera outside the submitted work and serving as principal or chief investigator or clinical investigator for clinical trials sponsored by Pfizer, Italfarmaco, Summit, Santhera, Roche, and PTC Therapeutics. Dr Smith reported receiving grants for partial salary support from Reveragen BioPharma as principal investigator during the conduct of the study. Dr Finkel reported receiving grants from ReveraGen BioPharma during the conduct of the study and grants from Catabasis and Sarepta outside the submitted work. Dr Webster reported receiving research funding from ReveraGen BioPharma during the conduct of the study. Dr Kuntz reported receiving grants from Astellas Gene Therapies, Biogen, Genentech, Novartis, and Sarepta; personal fees from Biogen, Genentech, Novartis, and Sarepta; and data safety monitoring board services from Sarepta during the conduct of the study. Dr McDonald reported receiving grants from the NIH National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), US Department of Defense, National Institute on Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research, and Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy and personal fees from Astellas, BioMarin, Epirium Bio (formerly Capricor), Catabasis, Entrada Therapeutics, Avidity Therapeutics, Edgewise Therapeutics, FibroGen, Hoffmann La Roche, Marathon, Pfizer, Santhera Pharmaceuticals, Saraepta Therapeutics, and PTC Therapeutics outside the submitted work. Dr Damsker reported being an employee and shareholder of ReveraGen BioPharma. Dr Schwartz reported receiving personal fees from ReveraGen Biopharma during the conduct of the study and personal fees from RegenXBio and TRINDS outside the submitted work. Dr Mengle-Gaw reported receiving personal fees from ReveraGen BioPharma during the conduct of the study and personal fees from RegenXBio outside the submitted work. Dr Baranello reported receiving personal fees from Roche, serving as principal investigator in clinical trials for Pfizer and Reveragen, receiving grants from Sarepta via the Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, and serving as an investigator in a clinical trial for NS Pharma outside the submitted work. Dr Manzur reported receiving grants from NorthStar Clinical Network during the conduct of the study and serving as clinical lead for Northstar Clinical Network UK. Dr Muntoni reported receiving grants from Muscular Dystrophy UK North Star Consortium during the conduct of the study; grants from the NIH Research Great Ormond Street Hospital-ICH Biomedical Research Centre, Genethon, and Sarepta; and personal fees from Dyne Therapeutics, Pfizer, and Sarepta outside the submitted work. Dr Gordish-Dressman reported receiving personal fees from TRINDS during the conduct of the study and co-owning TRINDS outside the submitted work. Dr Ward reported receiving grants from ReveraGen BioPharma via the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute during the conduct of the study and grants from Amgen, Novartis, and PTC Therapeutics via the CHEO Research Institute outside the submitted work. Dr Hoffman reported receiving salary as chief executive officer and owning stock from ReveraGen BioPharma, serving as a board member for TRINDS, receiving grants from the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke during the conduct of the study; serving as vice president and owning stock for Agada BioSciences outside the submitted work; and owning a patent issued to ReveraGen BioPharma. Dr Dang reported receiving grants from the Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne and personal fees from ReveraGen BioPharma during the conduct of the study and grants from the NIH NIAMS outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was funded by grants R44NS095423 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to Drs Hoffman and Clemens, 5U54HD090254 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to Dr Hoffman, and U34AR068616 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases to Dr Clemens and grant agreement number 667078 from the European Commission Horizons 2020 to Dr Guglieri. Support for the vamorolone development program was provided by the Muscular Dystrophy Association, Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne UK (formed by Joining Jack and Duchenne Children’s Trust), Duchenne Research Fund, Save Our Sons, Michael’s Cause, Pietro’s Fight, Alex’s Wish, Ryan’s Quest, and Cure Duchenne. Vamorolone was developed through a partnership with the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Therapeutics for Rare and Neglected Diseases program, with support for drug production, formulation, and toxicology studies. The Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group Duchenne Natural History Study was supported by grants H133B031118 and H133B090001 from the US Department of Education National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, W81XWH-12-1-0417 from the US Department of Defense, and R01AR061875 from the NIH NIAMS and Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy. The UK NorthStar Clinical Network for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy is funded by Muscular Dystrophy UK.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Group Information: NorthStar UK Network and CINRG DNHS Investigators are listed in Supplement 3.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 4.
                Additional Contributions: We would like to thank all patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and their families for participating in the research studies, as well as the study coordinators, clinical evaluators, and Therapeutic Research in Neuromuscular Disorders Solutions staff for the vamorolone long-term extension trial.
                Article
                zoi211221
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44178
                8790668
                35076703
                245cf78f-45cd-42bf-850e-30cff7bc99d4
                Copyright 2022 Mah JK et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 3 September 2021
                : 19 November 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Neurology

                Comments

                Comment on this article