42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: Global perspective

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assessing the impact of oral health on the life quality of children: implications for research and practice.

          Traditionally, child oral health has been assessed using clinical parameters of disease and deformity. However, there is a growing interest in the psychosocial impact of oral health among children. This commentary outlines the value and need for assessing child oral health-related quality of life (COHQoL). COHQoL has implications for oral health needs assessment (at an individual and population level) and for evaluating outcomes from specific treatments, initiatives and dental services overall. In addition, it could prove to be a useful adjunct tool for evidence-based dentistry research and practice. Theoretical and practical considerations in assessing the complex psychosocial construct of oral health among children are discussed: the use of general versus oral health-specific measures, the development of tools for children, the use of generic versus condition-specific measures, and the measurement of 'positive' oral health. Recommendations for research and practice are presented.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Caries risk assessment. A systematic review.

            To assess the ability of multivariate models and single factors to correctly identify future caries development in pre-school children and schoolchildren/adolescents. A systematic literature search for relevant papers was conducted with pre-determined inclusion criteria. Abstracts and full-text articles were assessed independently by two reviewers. The quality of studies was graded according to the QUADAS tool. The quality of evidence of models and single predictors was assessed using the GRADE approach. Ninety original articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seven studies had high quality, 35 moderate and the rest poor quality. The accuracy of multivariate models was higher for pre-school children than for schoolchildren/adolescents. However, the models had seldom been validated in independent populations, making their accuracy uncertain. Of the single predictors, baseline caries experience had moderate/good accuracy in pre-school children and limited accuracy in schoolchildren/adolescents. The period of highest risk for caries incidence in permanent teeth was the first few years after tooth eruption. In general, the quality of evidence was limited. Multivariate models and baseline caries prevalence performed better in pre-school children than in schoolchildren/adolescents. Baseline caries prevalence was the most accurate single predictor in all age groups. The heterogeneity of populations, models, outcome criteria, measures and reporting hampered the synthesis of results. There is a great need to standardize study design, outcome measures and reporting of data in studies on caries risk assessment. The accuracy of prediction models should be validated in at least one independent population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How well do parents know their children? Implications for proxy reporting of child health-related quality of life.

              This study examined parental knowledge of their children's oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) (Objective 1), and the effects of different analytical techniques to manage 'Don't know' (DK) responses on the validity and reliability of the questionnaire (Objective 2) and the level of agreement between parental and child reports (Objective 3). The parental (PPQ) and child (CPQ11-14) components of the Child Oral Health Quality of Life Questionnaire were used. Objectives 1 and 2 were addressed in the study that involved 221 parents and Objective 3 in the study that involved 63 pairs of parents and children. Four methods for treating DK responses in the PPQ were tested: listwise deletion, item mean imputation, imputation of the value zero and adjustment of scores to account for items with DK responses. Respectively, 26 and 11% of the parents gave > or = 3 and 6 > or = DK responses to 33 items comprising the PPQ. DK responses were associated with child's age and clinical condition, and parental gender. The methods of managing DK responses did not have differing effects on the measurement properties of the PPQ and the level of agreement between parents and children. Some parents have limited knowledge concerning their children's OHRQoL. However, given that parental and child reports are measuring different realities, information provided by parents is useful even if it is incomplete.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
                Int J Paediatr Dent
                Wiley
                0960-7439
                1365-263X
                March 13 2019
                May 2019
                May 17 2019
                May 2019
                : 29
                : 3
                : 238-248
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry University of Maryland School of Dentistry Baltimore Maryland
                [2 ]Department of Comprehensive Dentistry School of Dentistry University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas
                [3 ]Department of Developmental Dentistry School of Dentistry University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas
                [4 ]Department of Pediatric Dentistry Lutheran University of Brazil School of Dentistry Canoas Brazil
                [5 ]Dental Public Health Faculty of Dentistry University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China
                [6 ]Faculty of Dentistry Thammasat University Patumthani Thailand
                [7 ]Faculty of Dentistry Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Dental Innovation and Impact, Kings College London London UK
                [8 ]School of Dentistry University of Queensland Herston Queensland Australia
                [9 ]Department of Paediatric Dental Medicine Faculty of Dental Medicine Medical University Sofia Bulgaria
                [10 ]Department of Family and Community Oral Health Institute of Dentistry Suranaree University of Technology Nakhon Ratchasima Thailand
                [11 ]Department of Odontology Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
                Article
                10.1111/ipd.12484
                31099128
                24437f38-89a1-4983-81c7-0446b24e5de3
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article