4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sphingolipids control dermal fibroblast heterogeneity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Human cells produce thousands of lipids that change during cell differentiation and can vary across individual cells of the same type. However, we are only starting to characterize the function of these cell-to-cell differences in lipid composition. Here, we measured the lipidomes and transcriptomes of individual human dermal fibroblasts by coupling high-resolution mass spectrometry imaging with single-cell transcriptomics. We found that the cell-to-cell variations of specific lipid metabolic pathways contribute to the establishment of cell states involved in the organization of skin architecture. Sphingolipid composition is shown to define fibroblast subpopulations, with sphingolipid metabolic rewiring driving cell-state transitions. Therefore, cell-to-cell lipid heterogeneity affects the determination of cell states, adding a new regulatory component to the self-organization of multicellular systems.

          Greasing the skin

          In multicellular organisms, cells are parts of communities in which an individual contributes to the collective phenotype of the community. Appreciating the “social” organization of these cell communities is instrumental to dissecting their physiology and the pathological consequences of their abnormalities. Capolupo et al . investigated the lipid metabolism and gene expression of individual human skin cells and found that specific lipid compositions drive cell specialization. Specifically, the authors found that sphingolipids determine the transcriptional programs of fibroblasts populating in different layers of the human skin. These results reveal an unexpected role for membrane lipids in the establishment of cell identity and tissue architecture. —LZ

          Abstract

          Single-cell lipidomics and transcriptomics define sphingolipid compositions important for human skin fibroblast subsets.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION

          External signals (e.g., hormones, cytokines, and growth factors) and cell-autonomous properties (e.g., the transcriptional and metabolic states of individual cells) concur to determine cell-fate decisions. Although the mode of action of external signals has been detailed extensively in decades of intense research, the molecular bases of cell-autonomous contribution to cell-fate decisions have been traditionally more elusive. Lipids are fundamental constituents of all living beings. They participate in energy metabolism, account for the assembly of biological membranes, act as signaling molecules, and interact with proteins to influence their function and intracellular distribution. Eukaryotic cells produce thousands of different lipids, each endowed with peculiar structural features and contributing to specific biological functions. With the development of lipidomics, we can now understand the lipid compositional complexity of cells and start making sense of lipidome dynamics. Lipidomes indeed vary among cell types and are reprogrammed in differentiation events. However, whether and how lipidome remodeling assists changes in cell identity is not understood.

          RATIONALE

          Human dermal fibroblasts are cell constituents of our skin that display cell-to-cell phenotypic heterogeneity as a result of their dynamic cell identity. Thus, individual dermal fibroblasts can adopt different cell specializations that are responsible for wound repair, fibrosis, or remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Whether lipid metabolism is differently shaped in fibroblasts with different phenotypes and if lipid composition participates in the establishment of fibroblast subtypes were unknown. Here, we addressed both the overall lipid composition and phenotypic states of hundreds of individual dermal fibroblasts looking for a possible role of lipids in the determination of dermal fibroblast identity.

          RESULTS

          We coupled high-resolution mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell mRNA sequencing to resolve both lipidomes and transcriptomes of individual dermal fibroblasts. We found that dermal fibroblasts exist in multiple lipid compositional states that correspond to transcriptional subpopulations in vitro and to fibroblasts populating different layers of the skin in vivo. We isolated the metabolic pathways that account for this correlation and found that sphingolipids are major markers of the different lipid compositional states that we named lipotypes. We also found that lipotype heterogeneity influences cell identity by diversifying the response of otherwise identical cells to extracellular stimuli and that manipulating sphingolipid composition is sufficient to reprogram cells toward different phenotypic states. We also found that lipid composition and signaling pathways are wired in self-sustained circuits that account for the metabolic and transcriptional fibroblast heterogeneity. Specifically, we observed that sphingolipids modulate fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) signaling, with globo-series sphingolipids acting as positive regulators and ganglio-series glycosphingolipids as negative regulators. In turn, FGF2 signaling counteracts ganglioside production by sustaining the alternative metabolic pathway leading to the production of globo-series sphingolipids.

          CONCLUSION

          By studying the lipid composition of individual cells, we found that lipids play a driving role in the determination of cell states. We indeed uncovered an unexpected relationship between lipidomes and transcriptomes in individual cells. In fact, our results indicate that the acquisition of specific lipotypes influenced the activity of signaling receptors and fostered alternative transcriptional states. Cell states are intermediates in the process of cell differentiation in which state switches precede terminal commitment. As a consequence, lipidome remodeling could work as an early driver in the establishment of cell identity, and following lipid metabolic trajectories of individual cells could have the potential to inform us about key mechanisms of cell fate decision. Thus, this study stimulates new questions about the role of lipids in cell-fate decisions and adds a new regulatory component to the self-organization of multicellular systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.

          Fiji is a distribution of the popular open-source software ImageJ focused on biological-image analysis. Fiji uses modern software engineering practices to combine powerful software libraries with a broad range of scripting languages to enable rapid prototyping of image-processing algorithms. Fiji facilitates the transformation of new algorithms into ImageJ plugins that can be shared with end users through an integrated update system. We propose Fiji as a platform for productive collaboration between computer science and biology research communities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data

            Single-cell transcriptomics has transformed our ability to characterize cell states, but deep biological understanding requires more than a taxonomic listing of clusters. As new methods arise to measure distinct cellular modalities, a key analytical challenge is to integrate these datasets to better understand cellular identity and function. Here, we develop a strategy to "anchor" diverse datasets together, enabling us to integrate single-cell measurements not only across scRNA-seq technologies, but also across different modalities. After demonstrating improvement over existing methods for integrating scRNA-seq data, we anchor scRNA-seq experiments with scATAC-seq to explore chromatin differences in closely related interneuron subsets and project protein expression measurements onto a bone marrow atlas to characterize lymphocyte populations. Lastly, we harmonize in situ gene expression and scRNA-seq datasets, allowing transcriptome-wide imputation of spatial gene expression patterns. Our work presents a strategy for the assembly of harmonized references and transfer of information across datasets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.

              Non-biological experimental variation or "batch effects" are commonly observed across multiple batches of microarray experiments, often rendering the task of combining data from these batches difficult. The ability to combine microarray data sets is advantageous to researchers to increase statistical power to detect biological phenomena from studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or in studies that require the sequential hybridization of arrays. In general, it is inappropriate to combine data sets without adjusting for batch effects. Methods have been proposed to filter batch effects from data, but these are often complicated and require large batch sizes ( > 25) to implement. Because the majority of microarray studies are conducted using much smaller sample sizes, existing methods are not sufficient. We propose parametric and non-parametric empirical Bayes frameworks for adjusting data for batch effects that is robust to outliers in small sample sizes and performs comparable to existing methods for large samples. We illustrate our methods using two example data sets and show that our methods are justifiable, easy to apply, and useful in practice. Software for our method is freely available at: http://biosun1.harvard.edu/complab/batch/.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                April 15 2022
                April 15 2022
                : 376
                : 6590
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Interfaculty Institute of Bioengineering and Global Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [2 ]Brain Mind Institute, Faculty of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [3 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
                [4 ]School of Life Sciences, Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [5 ]Institute of Biochemistry and Cellular Biology, National Research Council of Italy, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
                [6 ]Institute for Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
                [7 ]Maastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging Institute, Division of Imaging Mass Spectrometry, Maastricht University, 6629 ER Maastricht, Netherlands.
                [8 ]Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.
                [9 ]Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.
                [10 ]Faculté des Sciences de la Vie, Bioimaging and Optics Platform, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015 Vaud, Switzerland.
                [11 ]Institute of Hygiene, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany.
                [12 ]Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [13 ]Swiss Cancer Center Leman, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [14 ]The Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lausanne Branch, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
                [15 ]Département de Dermatologie et Vénéréologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [16 ]Personalized Cancer Prevention Research Unit, Head and Neck Surgery Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [17 ]Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/science.abh1623
                35420948
                23ebc535-5d6d-4aaa-88ad-9e9d3830072d
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article