4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cuspal Deflection and Temperature Rise of MOD Cavities Restored through the Bulk-Fill and Incremental Layering Techniques Using Flowable and Packable Bulk-Fill Composites

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The aim of this study was to investigate cuspal deflection caused by material shrinkage and temperature rise occurring in the pulp chamber during photopolymerization. The aim of this study was also to investigate the effect of flowable and packable bulk-fill composites on cuspal deflection occurring in mesio-occlusal–distal (MOD) cavities restored through the bulk-fill or through the incremental layering technique. Additionally, mechanical and thermal properties of bulk-fill composites were considered. Methods: Two bulk-fill composites (high-viscosity and low-viscosity), largely differing in material composition, were used. These composites were characterized through linear shrinkage and compressive test. Cuspal deformation during restoration of mesio-occlusal–distal cavities of human premolars was evaluated using both the bulk-fill and the incremental layering techniques. Temperature rise was measured through thermocouples placed 1 mm below the cavity floor. Results: Shrinkage of the flowable composite was significantly higher ( p < 0.05) than that of packable composite, while mechanical properties were significantly lower ( p < 0.05). For cusp distance variation, no significant difference was observed in cavities restored through both restorative techniques, while temperature rise values spanned from 8.2 °C to 11.9 °C. Conclusions: No significant difference in cusp deflection between the two composites was observed according to both the restorative techniques. This result can be ascribed to the Young’s modulus suggesting that the packable composite is stiffer, while the flowable composite is more compliant, thus balancing the cusp distance variation. The light curing modality of 1000 mW/cm 2 for 20 s can be considered thermally safe for the pulp chamber.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review.

          Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-composite materials may have a negative impact on the clinical performance of bonded restorations. The purpose of this systematic review is to discuss the primary factors involved with polymerization shrinkage stress development. According to the current literature, polymerization stress of resin composites is determined by their volumetric shrinkage, viscoelastic behavior and by restrictions imposed to polymerization shrinkage. Therefore, the material's composition, its degree of conversion and reaction kinetics become aspects of interest, together with the confinement and compliance of the cavity preparation. Information provided in this review was based on original scientific research published in Dental, Chemistry and Biomaterials journals. Textbooks on Chemistry and Dental Materials were also referenced for basic concepts. Shrinkage stress development must be considered a multi-factorial phenomenon. Therefore, accessing the specific contribution of volumetric shrinkage, viscoelastic behavior, reaction kinetics and local conditions on stress magnitude seems impractical. Some of the restorative techniques aiming at stress reduction have limited applicability, because their efficiency varies depending upon the materials employed. Due to an intense research activity over the years, the understanding of this matter has increased remarkably, leading to the development of new restorative techniques and materials that may help minimize this problem.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance.

            The study aimed to assess the mechanical performance of seven bulk-fill RBCs (Venus Bulk Fill, Heraeus Kulzer; SureFil SDR flow, Dentsply Caulk; x-tra base and x-tra fil, VOCO; Filtek Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE; SonicFill, Kerr; Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) by determining their flexural strength (σ), reliability (Weibull parameter, m), flexural modulus (Eflexural), indentation modulus (YHU), Vickers hardness (HV), and creep (Cr). The significant highest flexural strengths were measured for SonicFill, x-tra base, and x-tra fil, while x-tra base, SureFil SDR flow, and Venus Bulk Fill showed the best reliability. The differences among the materials became more evident in terms of Eflexural and YHU, with x-tra fil achieving the highest values, while Filtek Bulk Fill and Venus Bulk Fill achieved the lowest. The enlarged depth of cure in bulk-fill RBCs seems to have been realized by enhancing the materials' translucency through decreasing the filler amount and increasing the filler size. The manufacturer's recommendation to finish a bulk-fill RBC restoration by adding a capping layer made of regular RBCs is an imperative necessity, since the modulus of elasticity and hardness of certain materials (SureFil SDR flow, Venus Bulk Fill, and Filtek Bulk Fill) were considerably below the mean values measured in regular nanohybrid and microhybrid RBCs. The class of bulk-fill RBCs revealed similar flexural strength values as the class of nanohybrid and microhybrid RBCs, and significantly higher values when compared to flowable RBCs. The modulus of elasticity (Eflexural), the indentation modulus (YHU), and the Vickers hardness (HV) classify the bulk-fill RBCs as between the hybrid RBCs and the flowable RBCs; in terms of creep, bulk-fill and the flowable RBCs perform similarly, both showing a significantly lower creep resistance when compared to the nanohybrid and microhybrid RBCs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.

              Monomer development for a reduced shrinkage of composite materials still challenges the modern research. The purpose of this study was to analyse the shrinkage behavior of an innovative composite material for dental restorations based on a resin system that is claimed to control polymerization kinetics having incorporated a photoactive group within the resin. Shrinkage stress development within the first 300s after photoinitiation, gel point as well as micro-mechanical properties (Vickers hardness HV, modulus of elasticity E, creep Cr and elastic-plastic indentation work W(e)/W(tot)) were evaluated (n = 10). The experimental flowable resin-based composite (RBC) was measured in comparison to regular methacrylate-based micro- (Esthet X Flow) and nano-hybrid flowable RBCs (Filtek Supreme Plus Flow). Additionally, the high viscosity counterparts of the two regular flowable methacryate-based composites (Esthet X Plus and Filtek Supreme Plus) as well as a low shrinkage silorane-based micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Silorane) were considered. The curing time was 20s (LED unit Freelight2, 3M-ESPE, 1226 mW/cm(2)). The experimental material achieved the significantly lowest contraction stress (1.1 ± .01 MPa) followed by the silorane-based composite (3.6 ± .03 MPa), whereas the highest stress values were induced in the regular methacrylate-based flowable composites EsthetX Flow (5.3 ± .3 MPa) and Filtek Supreme Flow (6.5 ± .3 MPa). In view of gel point, the best values were obtained for the experimental flowable composite (3.1 ± .1s) and Filtek Silorane (3.2 ± .3s), which did not differ significant from each others, whereas EsthetX Plus and Filtek Supreme Plus did also not differ significantly, inducing the shortest gel point. The experimental flowable material achieved also the lowest shrinkage-rate (maximum at 0.1 MPa/s). For all analysed materials, no significant difference in the micro-mechanical properties between top and bottom were found when measured on 2mm thick increments 24h after polymerization. The categories of flowable materials performed in the measured micro-mechanical properties significantly inferior when compared to the hybrid-composites, showing lower HV and E and predominantly higher creep and plastic deformation. Within the flowable RBCs, the experimental material achieved the lowest Vickers hardness, the highest modulus of elasticity, the highest creep and showed the significantly lowest elastic deformation. The experimental flowable composite revealed the lowest shrinkage stress and shrinkage-rate values in comparison to regular methacrylate composites but intermediate micro-mechanical properties. Being at the same time more rigid (higher modulus of elasticity) and more plastic (low W(e)/W(tot) and high creep values) as the regular flowable materials, its effect on interfacial stress build-up cannot be easily predicted. Copyright © 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Materials (Basel)
                Materials (Basel)
                materials
                Materials
                MDPI
                1996-1944
                11 December 2020
                December 2020
                : 13
                : 24
                : 5664
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials—National Research Council of Italy, V.le J.F. Kennedy 54—Mostra d’Oltremare Pad. 20, 80125 Naples, Italy; rosantis@ 123456unina.it
                [2 ]Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University “Federico II” of Naples, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; vincenzo.lodato@ 123456unina.it (V.L.); d.prisco@ 123456unina.it (D.P.); riccitie@ 123456unina.it (F.R.); sanrengo@ 123456unina.it (S.R.)
                [3 ]Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; carlorengo@ 123456alice.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: vito.gallicchio@ 123456unina.it ; Tel.: +39-3337670760
                [†]

                These authors share co-first authorship.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4746-7735
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1127-0877
                Article
                materials-13-05664
                10.3390/ma13245664
                7763159
                33322480
                23d2d609-5e31-44e8-8685-373ebe968b99
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 October 2020
                : 09 December 2020
                Categories
                Article

                cuspal deflection,composite material shrinkage,bulk-fill composite,mechanical properties,dental materials,temperature rise

                Comments

                Comment on this article