0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Autologous stem cell transplantation for progressive systemic sclerosis: a prospective non-interventional study from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Autoimmune Disease Working Party

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Three randomized controlled trials in early severe systemic sclerosis demonstrated that autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was superior to standard cyclophosphamide therapy. This European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study was designed to further decipher efficacy and safety of this procedure for severe systemic sclerosis patients in real-life practice and to search for prognostic factors. All consecutive adult patients with systemic sclerosis undergoing a first autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant between December 2012 and February 2016 were prospectively included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, non-relapse mortality, response and incidence of progression. Eighty patients with systemic sclerosis were included. The median duration of the follow-up was 24 (range, 6-57) months after stem cell transplantation using cyclophosphamide plus antithymocyte globulin conditioning for all, with CD34+ selection in 35 patients. At 2 years, the progression- free survival rate was 81.8%, the overall survival rate was 90%, the response rate was 88.7% and the incidence of progression was 11.9%. The 100-day non-relapse mortality rate was 6.25% (n=5) with four deaths from cardiac events, including three due to cyclophosphamide toxicity. Modified Rodnan skin score and forced vital capacity improved with time ( P<0.001). By multivariate analysis, baseline skin score >24 and older age at transplantation were associated with lower progression-free survival (hazard ratios 3.32 and 1.77, respectively). CD34+-cell selection was associated with better response (hazard ratio 0.46). This study confirms the efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation, using nonmyeloablative conditioning, in real-life practice for severe systemic sclerosis. Careful cardio-pulmonary assessment to identify organ involvement at the time of the patient’s referral, reduced cyclophosphamide doses and CD34+-cell selection may improve outcomes. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02516124.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Systemic sclerosis.

          Systemic sclerosis, also called scleroderma, is an immune-mediated rheumatic disease that is characterised by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs and vasculopathy. Although systemic sclerosis is uncommon, it has a high morbidity and mortality. Improved understanding of systemic sclerosis has allowed better management of the disease, including improved classification and more systematic assessment and follow-up. Additionally, treatments for specific complications have emerged and a growing evidence base supports the use of immune suppression for the treatment of skin and lung fibrosis. Some manifestations of the disease, such as scleroderma renal crisis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, digital ulceration, and gastro-oesophageal reflux, are now treatable. However, the burden of non-lethal complications associated with systemic sclerosis is substantial and is likely to become more of a challenge. Here, we review the clinical features of systemic sclerosis and describe the best practice approaches for its management. Furthermore, we identify future areas for development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database.

            To determine the causes and predictors of mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Patients with SSc (n=5860) fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria and prospectively followed in the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) cohort were analysed. EUSTAR centres completed a structured questionnaire on cause of death and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse survival in SSc subgroups and to identify predictors of mortality. Questionnaires were obtained on 234 of 284 fatalities. 55% of deaths were attributed directly to SSc and 41% to non-SSc causes; in 4% the cause of death was not assigned. Of the SSc-related deaths, 35% were attributed to pulmonary fibrosis, 26% to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and 26% to cardiac causes (mainly heart failure and arrhythmias). Among the non-SSc-related causes, infections (33%) and malignancies (31%) were followed by cardiovascular causes (29%). Of the non-SSc-related fatalities, 25% died of causes in which SSc-related complications may have participated (pneumonia, sepsis and gastrointestinal haemorrhage). Independent risk factors for mortality and their HR were: proteinuria (HR 3.34), the presence of PAH based on echocardiography (HR 2.02), pulmonary restriction (forced vital capacity below 80% of normal, HR 1.64), dyspnoea above New York Heart Association class II (HR 1.61), diffusing capacity of the lung (HR 1.20 per 10% decrease), patient age at onset of Raynaud's phenomenon (HR 1.30 per 10 years) and the modified Rodnan skin score (HR 1.20 per 10 score points). Disease-related causes, in particular pulmonary fibrosis, PAH and cardiac causes, accounted for the majority of deaths in SSc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis

              The aim was to update the 2009 European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc), with attention to new therapeutic questions. Update of the previous treatment recommendations was performed according to EULAR standard operating procedures. The task force consisted of 32 SSc clinical experts from Europe and the USA, 2 patients nominated by the pan-European patient association for SSc (Federation of European Scleroderma Associations (FESCA)), a clinical epidemiologist and 2 research fellows. All centres from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group were invited to submit and select clinical questions concerning SSc treatment using a Delphi approach. Accordingly, 46 clinical questions addressing 26 different interventions were selected for systematic literature review. The new recommendations were based on the available evidence and developed in a consensus meeting with clinical experts and patients. The procedure resulted in 16 recommendations being developed (instead of 14 in 2009) that address treatment of several SSc-related organ complications: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DUs), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), skin and lung disease, scleroderma renal crisis and gastrointestinal involvement. Compared with the 2009 recommendations, the 2016 recommendations include phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for the treatment of SSc-related RP and DUs, riociguat, new aspects for endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues and PDE-5 inhibitors for SSc-related PAH. New recommendations regarding the use of fluoxetine for SSc-related RP and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for selected patients with rapidly progressive SSc were also added. In addition, several comments regarding other treatments addressed in clinical questions and suggestions for the SSc research agenda were formulated. These updated data-derived and consensus-derived recommendations will help rheumatologists to manage patients with SSc in an evidence-based way. These recommendations also give directions for future clinical research in SSc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: for the NISSC1 members
                Journal
                Haematologica
                Haematologica
                HAEMA
                Haematologica
                Fondazione Ferrata Storti
                0390-6078
                1592-8721
                16 January 2020
                01 February 2021
                : 106
                : 2
                : 375-383
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Interdisciplinary Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology and Auto-inflammatory Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology and Rheumatology), University Hospital , Tubingen, Germany
                [2 ]Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo , Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
                [3 ]EBMT Paris Study Office, Saint Antoine Hospital, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie , INSERM UMR 938, Department of Haematology, Paris, France
                [4 ]EBMT Paris Study Office, Hopital St Antoine , INSERM UMR 938, Paris, France
                [5 ]Leiden University Medical Center , Department of Rheumatology, Leiden, the Netherlands
                [6 ]Scleroderma Clinic , Ospedale Pini, Department of Rheumatology, Milan, Italy
                [7 ]University and University Hospital of Basel , Department of Rheumatology, Basel, Switzerland
                [8 ]University Hospital of Wurzburg , Department of Rheumatology/Immunology, Wurzburg, Germany
                [9 ]Universitats Klinik of Bochum, Med. Klinik , Bochum, Germany
                [10 ]Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Medecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, Centre de Reference des Maladies Auto-Immunes Systemiques Rares Est-Sud-Ouest (RESO) , Strasbourg, France
                [11 ]CHU de Toulouse, Hopital Purpan, Service de Medecine Interne , Toulouse, France
                [12 ]Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo , Division of Hematology, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
                [13 ]Hopital Saint Louis & Universite Paris 7, Denis Diderot, Department of Hematology , Paris, France
                [14 ]Leiden University Medical Center , Department of Hematology, Leiden, the Netherlands
                [15 ]Strasbourg University Hospital , Department of Hematology, Strasbourg, France
                [16 ]CHU de Clermont Ferrand , Department of Hematology, Clermont Ferrand, France
                [17 ]Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield, UK
                [18 ]Hospital Clinic of Barcelona , Department of Hematology, Barcelona, Spain
                [19 ]UCT Oncopole, Department of Hematology , Toulouse, France
                [20 ]Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan , Milan, Italy
                [21 ]University Hospital Tubingen , Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology, Haematology, Immunology and Rheumatology), Tubingen, Germany
                [22 ]Saint Antoine Hospital , Department of Hematology, Paris, France
                [23 ]Hopital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris , Centre de Reference des Maladies Auto- Immunes Systemiques Rares d’Ile-de-France, Filiere ‘FAI2R’, Unite de Medecine Interne: Maladies Auto-immunes et Pathologie Vasculaire (UF 04), Universite de Paris , EA 3518, Paris, France
                [24 ]Department of Medicine, McGill University , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                Author notes

                Disclosures

                No conflicts of interests to diclose.

                Contributions

                JH, DF, MB, JS and ML: conception, study design, analyses and interpretation of data. MO, HUS, NDP, TD, MS, RS, TM, GP, BS, DM, EM, BL, JOB, MS, AH, FO, LK and ZM: acquisition of data.

                Article
                10.3324/haematol.2019.230128
                7849556
                31949011
                23b6f35a-0d69-4ee0-9d3c-5645cddc4fa1
                Copyright© 2021 Ferrata Storti Foundation

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 June 2019
                : 09 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 34, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article