1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      RealPic: Picture norms of real-world common items

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A circumplex model of affect.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?

            We propose that aesthetic pleasure is a function of the perceiver's processing dynamics: The more fluently perceivers can process an object, the more positive their aesthetic response. We review variables known to influence aesthetic judgments, such as figural goodness, figure-ground contrast, stimulus repetition, symmetry, and prototypicality, and trace their effects to changes in processing fluency. Other variables that influence processing fluency, like visual or semantic priming, similarly increase judgments of aesthetic pleasure. Our proposal provides an integrative framework for the study of aesthetic pleasure and sheds light on the interplay between early preferences versus cultural influences on taste, preferences for both prototypical and abstracted forms, and the relation between beauty and truth. In contrast to theories that trace aesthetic pleasure to objective stimulus features per se, we propose that beauty is grounded in the processing experiences of the perceiver, which are in part a function of stimulus properties.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

              One of the major lessons of memory research has been that human memory is fallible, imprecise, and subject to interference. Thus, although observers can remember thousands of images, it is widely assumed that these memories lack detail. Contrary to this assumption, here we show that long-term memory is capable of storing a massive number of objects with details from the image. Participants viewed pictures of 2,500 objects over the course of 5.5 h. Afterward, they were shown pairs of images and indicated which of the two they had seen. The previously viewed item could be paired with either an object from a novel category, an object of the same basic-level category, or the same object in a different state or pose. Performance in each of these conditions was remarkably high (92%, 88%, and 87%, respectively), suggesting that participants successfully maintained detailed representations of thousands of images. These results have implications for cognitive models, in which capacity limitations impose a primary computational constraint (e.g., models of object recognition), and pose a challenge to neural models of memory storage and retrieval, which must be able to account for such a large and detailed storage capacity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Behavior Research Methods
                Behav Res
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1554-3528
                August 2021
                February 10 2021
                August 2021
                : 53
                : 4
                : 1746-1761
                Article
                10.3758/s13428-020-01523-z
                33569710
                2387d868-81f4-49d1-81ce-dbcdb1838922
                © 2021

                Free to read

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article