Is workplace health promotion research in the Nordic countries really on the right track?

This paper starts by briefly reviewing the history, theory and practice of the settings approach to promoting public health--highlighting its ecological perspective, its understanding of settings as dynamic open systems and its primary focus on whole system organization development and change. It goes on to outline perceived benefits and consider why, almost 20 years after the Ottawa Charter advocated the approach, there remains a relatively poorly developed evidence base of effectiveness. Identifying three key challenges--relating to the construction of the evidence base for health promotion, the diversity of conceptual understandings and real-life practice and the complexity of evaluating ecological whole system approaches--it suggests that these have resulted in an ongoing tendency to evaluate only discrete projects in settings, thus failing to capture the 'added value' of whole system working. It concludes by exploring the potential value of theory-based evaluation and identifying key issues that will need to be addressed in moving forward--funding evaluation within and across settings; ensuring links between evidence, policy and practice; and clarifying and articulating the theories that underpin the settings approach generically and inform the approach as applied within particular settings. Show more

Taking a settings approach to health promotion means addressing the contexts within which people live, work, and play and making these the object of inquiry and intervention as well as the needs and capacities of people to be found in different settings. This approach can increase the likelihood of success because it offers opportunities to situate practice in its context. Members of the setting can optimize interventions for specific contextual contingencies, target crucial factors in the organizational context influencing behavior, and render settings themselves more health promoting. A number of attempts have been made to systematize evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions in different types of settings (e.g., school-based health promotion, community development). Few, if any, attempts have been made to systematically develop a template or framework for analyzing those features of settings that should influence intervention design and delivery. This article lays out the core elements of such a framework in the form of a nested series of questions to guide analysis. Furthermore, it offers advice on additional considerations that should be taken into account when operationalizing a settings approach in the field. Show more