1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sensory tuning in neuronal movement commands

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          The superior colliculus (SC) triggers rapid orienting gaze shifts, called saccades, via strong movement-locked “motor” bursts. We show that these bursts are strongly detached from direct motor control and are instead visual-feature tuned, changing in their properties for different eye-movement target images (despite similar movements). Such visual feature tuning of SC motor commands is not haphazard, being most prominent for coherent real-life object images as the eye movement targets, as opposed to featureless pictures, and also being strongest in the SC’s most motor neurons. Our results suggest that the SC can relay, via re-entrant projections to the visual system, an internal estimate of peripheral saccade target appearance exactly when retinal image signals are most unreliable due to rapid eyeball rotations.

          Abstract

          Movement control is critical for successful interaction with our environment. However, movement does not occur in complete isolation of sensation, and this is particularly true of eye movements. Here, we show that the neuronal eye movement commands emitted by the superior colliculus (SC), a structure classically associated with oculomotor control, encompass a robust visual sensory representation of eye movement targets. Thus, similar saccades toward different images are associated with different saccade-related “motor” bursts. Such sensory tuning in SC saccade motor commands appeared for all image manipulations that we tested, from simple visual features to real-life object images, and it was also strongest in the most motor neurons in the deeper collicular layers. Visual-feature discrimination performance in the motor commands was also stronger than in visual responses. Comparing SC motor command feature discrimination performance to that in the primary visual cortex during steady-state gaze fixation revealed that collicular motor bursts possess a reliable perisaccadic sensory representation of the peripheral saccade target’s visual appearance, exactly when retinal input is expected to be most uncertain. Our results demonstrate that SC neuronal movement commands likely serve a fundamentally sensory function.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

          1. An oculomotor delayed-response task was used to examine the spatial memory functions of neurons in primate prefrontal cortex. Monkeys were trained to fixate a central spot during a brief presentation (0.5 s) of a peripheral cue and throughout a subsequent delay period (1-6 s), and then, upon the extinction of the fixation target, to make a saccadic eye movement to where the cue had been presented. Cues were usually presented in one of eight different locations separated by 45 degrees. This task thus requires monkeys to direct their gaze to the location of a remembered visual cue, controls the retinal coordinates of the visual cues, controls the monkey's oculomotor behavior during the delay period, and also allows precise measurement of the timing and direction of the relevant behavioral responses. 2. Recordings were obtained from 288 neurons in the prefrontal cortex within and surrounding the principal sulcus (PS) while monkeys performed this task. An additional 31 neurons in the frontal eye fields (FEF) region within and near the anterior bank of the arcuate sulcus were also studied. 3. Of the 288 PS neurons, 170 exhibited task-related activity during at least one phase of this task and, of these, 87 showed significant excitation or inhibition of activity during the delay period relative to activity during the intertrial interval. 4. Delay period activity was classified as directional for 79% of these 87 neurons in that significant responses only occurred following cues located over a certain range of visual field directions and were weak or absent for other cue directions. The remaining 21% were omnidirectional, i.e., showed comparable delay period activity for all visual field locations tested. Directional preferences, or lack thereof, were maintained across different delay intervals (1-6 s). 5. For 50 of the 87 PS neurons, activity during the delay period was significantly elevated above the neuron's spontaneous rate for at least one cue location; for the remaining 37 neurons only inhibitory delay period activity was seen. Nearly all (92%) neurons with excitatory delay period activity were directional and few (8%) were omnidirectional. Most (62%) neurons with purely inhibitory delay period activity were directional, but a substantial minority (38%) was omnidirectional. 6. Fifteen of the neurons with excitatory directional delay period activity also had significant inhibitory delay period activity for other cue directions. These inhibitory responses were usually strongest for, or centered about, cue directions roughly opposite those optimal for excitatory responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

            The spatial interaction of visual attention and saccadic eye movements was investigated in a dual-task paradigm that required a target-directed saccade in combination with a letter discrimination task. Subjects had to saccade to locations within horizontal letter strings left and right of a central fixation cross. The performance in discriminating between the symbols "E" and "E", presented tachistoscopically before the saccade within the surrounding distractors was taken as a measure of visual attention. The data show that visual discrimination is best when discrimination stimulus and saccade target refer to the same object; discrimination at neighboring items is close to chance level. Also, it is not possible, in spite of prior knowledge of discrimination target position, to direct attention to the discrimination target while saccading to a spatially close saccade target. The data strongly argue for an obligatory and selective coupling of saccade programming and visual attention to one common target object. The results favor a model in which a single attentional mechanism selects objects for perceptual processing and recognition, and also provides the information necessary for motor action.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of attention in the programming of saccades.

              Accurate saccadic programming in natural visual scenes requires a signal designating which of the many potential targets is to be the goal of the saccade. Is this signal controlled by the allocation of perceptual attention, or do saccades have their own independent selective filter? We found evidence for the involvement of perceptual attention, namely: (1) summoning perceptual attention to a target also facilitated saccades; (2) perceptual identification was better at the saccadic goal than elsewhere; and (3) attempts to dissociate the locus of attention from the saccadic goal were unsuccessful, i.e. it was not possible to prepare to look quickly and accurately at one target while at the same time making highly accurate perceptual judgements about targets elsewhere. We also studied the trade-off between saccadic and perceptual performance by means of a novel application of the "attentional operating characteristic" (AOC) to oculomotor performance. This analysis revealed that some attention could be diverted from the saccadic goal with virtually no cost to either saccadic latency or accuracy, showing that there is a ceiling on the attentional demands of saccades. The links we discovered between saccades and attention can be explained by a model in which perceptual attention determines the endpoint of the saccade, while a separate trigger signal initiates the saccade in response to transient changes in the attentional locus. The model will be discussed in the context of current neurophysiological work on saccadic control.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                11 September 2023
                19 September 2023
                11 March 2024
                : 120
                : 38
                : e2305759120
                Affiliations
                [1] aPhysiology of Active Vision Laboratory, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tübingen University , Tübingen 72076, Germany
                [2] bHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen University , Tübingen 72076, Germany
                [3] cCentral Nervous Systems Diseases Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG , Biberach 88400, Germany
                Author notes
                2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: ziad.m.hafed@ 123456cin.uni-tuebingen.de .

                Edited by Stephen Lisberger, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; received April 10, 2023; accepted August 2, 2023

                1M.P.B. and A.R.B. contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-7313
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9968-119X
                Article
                202305759
                10.1073/pnas.2305759120
                10515157
                37695898
                22dda96c-fe94-4ec9-b319-c735865f3acd
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 10 April 2023
                : 02 August 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 12, Words: 9267
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), FundRef 501100001659;
                Award ID: BO5681/1-1
                Award Recipient : Matthias P. Baumann Award Recipient : Amarender R. Bogadhi Award Recipient : Anna F. Denninger Award Recipient : Ziad M. Hafed
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), FundRef 501100001659;
                Award ID: 276693517
                Award Recipient : Matthias P. Baumann Award Recipient : Amarender R. Bogadhi Award Recipient : Anna F. Denninger Award Recipient : Ziad M. Hafed
                Categories
                research-article, Research Article
                neuro, Neuroscience
                424
                Biological Sciences
                Neuroscience

                active vision,superior colliculus,saccades,perisaccadic perception,perceptual stability

                Comments

                Comment on this article