0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tailored support for preparing employees with cancer to return to work: Recognition and gaining new insights in an open atmosphere

      research-article
      a , a , b , c , d , e , f , c , a , b , *
      Work (Reading, Mass.)
      IOS Press
      Oncology, work participation, human-centered approach

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          A considerable number of cancer survivors face difficulties in returning to work (RTW). More insight is needed on how to support employees shortly after cancer treatment and help them make the transition back to work.

          OBJECTIVE:

          To gain an in-depth understanding of how and under what circumstances a Cancer & Work Support (CWS) program, which assists sick-listed employees with cancer in preparing their RTW, works.

          METHODS:

          A qualitative design was used, inspired by Grounded Theory and Realist Evaluation components. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with RTW professionals ( N = 8) and employees with cancer ( N = 14). Interview themes covered experiences with CWS, active elements, and impeding and facilitating factors. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed by multiple researchers for contextual factors, active mechanisms, and the outcomes experienced.

          RESULTS:

          Respondents experienced the support as human centered, identifying two characteristics: ‘Involvement’ (‘how’ the support was offered), and ‘Approach’ (‘what’ was offered). Four themes were perceived as important active elements: 1) open connection and communication, 2) recognition and attention, 3) guiding awareness and reflection, and 4) providing strategies for coping with the situation. Variation in the experiences and RTW outcomes, appeared to be related to the personal, medical and environmental context.

          CONCLUSION:

          Both professionals and employees really appreciated the CWS because it contributed to RTW after cancer. This research shows that not only ‘what’ RTW professionals do, but also ‘how’ they do it, is important for meaningful RTW support. A good relationship in an open and understanding atmosphere can contribute to the receptiveness (of employees) for cancer support.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

          R Ryan, E Deci (1999)
          Human beings can be proactive and engaged or, alternatively, passive and alienated, largely as a function of the social conditions in which they develop and function. Accordingly, research guided by self-determination theory has focused on the social-contextual conditions that facilitate versus forestall the natural processes of self-motivation and healthy psychological development. Specifically, factors have been examined that enhance versus undermine intrinsic motivation, self-regulation, and well-being. The findings have led to the postulate of three innate psychological needs--competence, autonomy, and relatedness--which when satisfied yield enhanced self-motivation and mental health and when thwarted lead to diminished motivation and well-being. Also considered is the significance of these psychological needs and processes within domains such as health care, education, work, sport, religion, and psychotherapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

            A Bandura (1977)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description.

              There are shortcomings in traditional theorizing about effective ways of coping with bereavement, most notably, with respect to the so-called "grief work hypothesis." Criticisms include imprecise definition, failure to represent dynamic processing that is characteristic of grieving, lack of empirical evidence and validation across cultures and historical periods, and a limited focus on intrapersonal processes and on health outcomes. Therefore, a revised model of coping with bereavement, the dual process model, is proposed. This model identifies two types of stressors, loss- and restoration-oriented, and a dynamic, regulatory coping process of oscillation, whereby the grieving individual at times confronts, at other times avoids, the different tasks of grieving. This model proposes that adaptive coping is composed of confrontation--avoidance of loss and restoration stressors. It also argues the need for dosage of grieving, that is, the need to take respite from dealing with either of these stressors, as an integral part of adaptive coping. Empirical research to support this conceptualization is discussed, and the model's relevance to the examination of complicated grief, analysis of subgroup phenomena, as well as interpersonal coping processes, is described.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Work
                Work
                WOR
                Work (Reading, Mass.)
                IOS Press (Nieuwe Hemweg 6B, 1013 BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands )
                1051-9815
                1875-9270
                23 June 2023
                15 December 2023
                2023
                : 76
                : 4
                : 1519-1533
                Affiliations
                [a ]Tranzo-Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University , Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Human Resource Studies, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University , Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [c ]TNO Innovation for Life, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [d ]Optentia Research Unit, North-West University , Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
                [e ]Arbo Unie, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
                [f ]Center for Human Resource Organization and Management Effectiveness, Nyenrode Business University , Breukelen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ]Address for correspondence: Margot C.W. Joosen, PhD. E-mail: m.c.w.Joosen@ 123456tilburguniversity.edu .
                Article
                WOR220566
                10.3233/WOR-220566
                10741312
                37355925
                226f44ad-6980-4c74-b1cb-3e8fcb3cf168
                © 2023 – The authors. Published by IOS Press

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License.

                History
                : 5 October 2022
                : 27 April 2023
                Categories
                Research Article

                oncology,work participation,human-centered approach
                oncology, work participation, human-centered approach

                Comments

                Comment on this article