16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Preeclampsia and Severe Maternal Morbidity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Significant changes to the delivery obstetrical care that occurred with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic may be associated with higher risks of adverse maternal outcomes. We evaluated preeclampsia/HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome and composite severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among pregnant people who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared these data with those of people who gave birth before the pandemic in Ontario, Canada.

          Methods

          This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data sets from ICES. Data on pregnant people at ≥20 weeks gestation who gave birth between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2021, were compared with those of pregnant people who gave birth within the same date range for the years 2015–2019. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the effect of the pandemic period on the odds of preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome and composite SMM, adjusting for maternal baseline characteristics and comorbidities.

          Results

          There were no differences between the study periods in the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome among primiparous (aOR 1.00; 95% CI 0.91–1.11) and multiparous (aOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.81–1.09) patients and no differences for composite SMM (primiparous, aOR 1.00; 95% CI 0.95–1.05; multiparous, aOR 1.01; 95% CI 0.95–1.08).

          Conclusion

          Adverse maternal outcomes were not higher among pregnant people who gave birth during the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada, when compared with those who gave birth before the pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement

          Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on health-care systems and potentially on pregnancy outcomes, but no systematic synthesis of evidence of this effect has been undertaken. We aimed to assess the collective evidence on the effects on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes of the pandemic. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the effects of the pandemic on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. We searched MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, from Jan 1, 2020, to Jan 8, 2021, for case-control studies, cohort studies, and brief reports comparing maternal and perinatal mortality, maternal morbidity, pregnancy complications, and intrapartum and neonatal outcomes before and during the pandemic. We also planned to record any additional maternal and offspring outcomes identified. Studies of solely SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant individuals, as well as case reports, studies without comparison groups, narrative or systematic literature reviews, preprints, and studies reporting on overlapping populations were excluded. Quantitative meta-analysis was done for an outcome when more than one study presented relevant data. Random-effects estimate of the pooled odds ratio (OR) of each outcome were generated with use of the Mantel-Haenszel method. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020211753). Findings The search identified 3592 citations, of which 40 studies were included. We identified significant increases in stillbirth (pooled OR 1·28 [95% CI 1·07–1·54]; I 2=63%; 12 studies, 168 295 pregnancies during and 198 993 before the pandemic) and maternal death (1·37 [1·22–1·53; I 2=0%, two studies [both from low-income and middle-income countries], 1 237 018 and 2 224 859 pregnancies) during versus before the pandemic. Preterm births before 37 weeks' gestation were not significantly changed overall (0·94 [0·87–1·02]; I 2=75%; 15 studies, 170 640 and 656 423 pregnancies) but were decreased in high-income countries (0·91 [0·84–0·99]; I 2=63%; 12 studies, 159 987 and 635 118 pregnancies), where spontaneous preterm birth was also decreased (0·81 [0·67–0·97]; two studies, 4204 and 6818 pregnancies). Mean Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores were higher, indicating poorer mental health, during versus before the pandemic (pooled mean difference 0·42 [95% CI 0·02–0·81; three studies, 2330 and 6517 pregnancies). Surgically managed ectopic pregnancies were increased during the pandemic (OR 5·81 [2·16–15·6]; I 2=26%; three studies, 37 and 272 pregnancies). No overall significant effects were identified for other outcomes included in the quantitative analysis: maternal gestational diabetes; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; preterm birth before 34 weeks', 32 weeks', or 28 weeks' gestation; iatrogenic preterm birth; labour induction; modes of delivery (spontaneous vaginal delivery, caesarean section, or instrumental delivery); post-partum haemorrhage; neonatal death; low birthweight (<2500 g); neonatal intensive care unit admission; or Apgar score less than 7 at 5 min. Interpretation Global maternal and fetal outcomes have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an increase in maternal deaths, stillbirth, ruptured ectopic pregnancies, and maternal depression. Some outcomes show considerable disparity between high-resource and low-resource settings. There is an urgent need to prioritise safe, accessible, and equitable maternity care within the strategic response to this pandemic and in future health crises. Funding None.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 and the impact of social determinants of health

              The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), originated in Wuhan, China, and has now spread internationally with over 4·3 million individuals infected and over 297 000 deaths as of May 14, 2020, according to the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. While COVID-19 has been termed a great equaliser, necessitating physical distancing measures across the globe, it is increasingly demonstrable that social inequalities in health are profoundly, and unevenly, impacting COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Many social determinants of health—including poverty, physical environment (eg, smoke exposure, homelessness), and race or ethnicity—can have a considerable effect on COVID-19 outcomes. Homeless families are at higher risk of viral transmission because of crowded living spaces and scarce access to COVID-19 screening and testing facilities. 1 In a Boston study of 408 individuals residing in a shelter, 147 (36%) had a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. 2 Smoke exposure and smoking has been linked to adverse outcomes in COVID-19. 3 A systematic review found that current or former smokers were more likely to have severe COVID-19 symptoms than non-smokers (relative risk [RR] 1·4 [95% CI 0·98–2·00]) as well as an increased risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, or COVID-19-related mortality (RR 2·4, 1·43–4·04). 3 In the USA, the COVID-19 infection rate is three times higher in predominantly black counties than in predominantly white counties, and the mortality rate is six times higher. 4 In Chicago alone, over 50% of COVID-19 cases and almost 70% of COVID-19 fatalities are disproportionately within the black population, who make up only 30% of the overall Chicago population. 4 It is also poignant that physical distancing measures, which are necessary to prevent the spread of COVID-19, are substantially more difficult for those with adverse social determinants and might contribute to both short-term and long-term morbidity. School closures increase food insecurity for children living in poverty who participate in school lunch programmes. Malnutrition causes substantial risk to both the physical and mental health of these children, including lowering immune response, which has the potential to increase the risk of infectious disease transmission. 5 People or families who are homeless are at higher risk of infection during physical lockdowns especially if public spaces are closed, resulting in physical crowding that is thought to increase viral transmission and reduce access to care. 1 Being able to physically distance has been dubbed an issue of privilege that is simply not accessible in some communities. 4 The association of social inequalities and COVID-19 morbidity is further compounded in the context of underlying chronic respiratory conditions, such as asthma, where there is a possible additive, or even multiplicative, effect on COVID-19 morbidity. Several adverse social determinants that impact the risk of COVID-19 morbidity also increase asthma morbidity, including poverty, smoke exposure, and race or ethnicity. 6 Consistent associations have been noted between poverty, smoke exposure, and non-Hispanic black race and measures of asthma morbidity, including poorer asthma control and increased emergency department visits for asthma. 6 The interplay of social determinants, asthma, and COVID-19 might help explain the risk of COVID-19 morbidity imposed by asthma, such as the disproportionate hospitalisations for COVID-19 among adults with asthma living in the USA. 7 The CDC note asthma to be a risk factor for COVID-19 morbidity. 8 Data released from the CDC on hospitalisations in the USA in the month of March, 2020, notes that 12 (27%) of 44 patients aged 18–49 years who were hospitalised with COVID-19 had a history of asthma, 8 in those aged 50–64 years, asthma was present in 7 (13%) of 53 cases, and in those 65 years or older asthma was present in 8 (13%) of 62 cases. 8 The effect of social determinants of health and COVID-19 morbidity is perhaps underappreciated. 6 Yet, the great public health lesson is that for centuries pandemics disproportionately affect the poor and disadvantaged. 9 Additionally, mitigating social determinants—such as improved housing, reduced overcrowding, and improved nutrition—reduces the effect of infectious diseases, such as tuberculosis, even before the advent of effective medications. 10 It is projected that recurrent wintertime outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 will likely occur after this initial wave, necessitating ongoing planning over the next few years. Studies are required to measure the effect of COVID-19 on individuals with adverse social determinants and innovative approaches to management are required, and might be different from those of the broader population. The effect of physical distancing measures, particularly among individuals with chronic conditions facing adverse social circumstances, needs to be studied because adverse determinants and physical distancing measures could compound issues, such as asthma medication access and broader access to care. The long-term effect of school closures, among those facing adverse social circumstances, is also in need of study. Moving forward, as the lessons of COVID-19 are considered, social determinants of health must be included as part of pandemic research priorities, public health goals, and policy implementation. While the relationships between these variables needs elucidating, measures that affect adverse determinants, such as reducing smoke exposure, regular income support to low-income households, access to testing and shelter among the homeless, and improving health-care access in low-income neighbourhoods have the potential to dramatically reduce future pandemic morbidity and mortality, perhaps even more so among individuals with respiratory conditions such as asthma. 7 More broadly, the effects of COVID-19 have shed light on the broad disparities within our society and provides an opportunity to address those disparities moving forward. 6 © 2020 Jim West/Science Photo Library 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Obstet Gynaecol Can
                J Obstet Gynaecol Can
                Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
                The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc.
                1701-2163
                1701-2163
                5 April 2022
                5 April 2022
                Affiliations
                [1]Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3-914, 700 University Ave, Toronto ON, M5G 1Z5
                [2]Obstetrics & Gynaecology, St. Michael’s Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 507-55 Queen St E, Toronto ON M5C 1R6
                [3]Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada, ICES, G1-06 2075 Bayview Ave,Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5
                [4]ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada, ICES, G1 06 2075 Bayview Ave Toronto, ON M4N 3M5
                [5]Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada, ICES, G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue Toronto, ON M4N 3M5
                [6]Melbourne School of Population & Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville,Victoria, 3010, Australia
                Article
                S1701-2163(22)00243-2
                10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.008
                8979839
                35395419
                226e8a5c-23f3-479a-a1d7-d2675cdb1528
                © 2022 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 21 January 2022
                : 4 March 2022
                : 7 March 2022
                Categories
                Obstetrics / Obstétrique

                pregnancy,covid-19,pre-eclampsia,hellp syndrome,pregnancy complications,severe maternal morbidity,cohort study,ontario

                Comments

                Comment on this article