1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correlation of Language Assessment Batteries of Toddlers With Developmental Language Delay

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To analyze the correlation between standardized language assessment batteries of toddlers and developmental language delays.

          Methods

          A total of 319 children with suspected language developmental delays were enrolled in this study retrospectively. They underwent the Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test (REVT) for vocabulary development assessment and at least one of two language assessment batteries: The Sequenced Language Scale for Infants (SELSI) or the Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale (PRES) for language development assessment. The correlation of the results for receptive and expressive language between the scales were analyzed.

          Results

          The participants were divided into two groups: SELSI and REVT (n=45) and PRES and REVT (n=273). When the children’s results were classified into groups (average, mild delay, and delay), receptive and expressive scores were significantly correlated with each other in both SELSI-REVT and PRES-REVT groups. In addition, the correlation of mean developmental age between tests are analyzed. In the SELSI-REVT group, there was weak correlation of mean developmental age between tests for receptive and expressive language. In the PRES-REVT group, there was a strong positive correlation of mean developmental age for receptive and expressive language in children aged >36 months. Attention deficits during the test was found to be the statistically significant factor affecting the differences between the tests. The odds ratios for receptive and expressive language were 2.60 (95% confidence interval,1.15–5.84) and 1.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.15–3.27), respectively.

          Conclusion

          This study examined the correlations and influencing factors between language development evaluation tools for toddlers. An integrated interpretation of comprehensive language and vocabulary evaluation tools may be possible in children older than 3 years of language developmental age.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder.

            It is thought that approximately 6% of children have speech and language difficulties of which the majority will not have any other significant developmental difficulties. Whilst most children's difficulties resolve, children whose difficulties persist into primary school may have long-term problems concerning literacy, socialisation, behaviour and school attainment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Language-impaired preschoolers: a follow-up into adolescence.

              This paper reports a longitudinal follow-up of 71 adolescents with a preschool history of speech-language impairment, originally studied by Bishop and Edmundson (1987). These children had been subdivided at 4 years into those with nonverbal IQ 2 SD below the mean (General Delay group), and those with normal nonverbal intelligence (SLI group). At age 5;6 the SLI group was subdivided into those whose language problems had resolved, and those with persistent SLI. The General Delay group was also followed up. At age 15-16 years, these children were compared with age-matched normal-language controls on a battery of tests of spoken language and literacy skills. Children whose language problems had resolved did not differ from controls on tests of vocabulary and language comprehension skills. However, they performed significantly less well on tests of phonological processing and literacy skill. Children who still had significant language difficulties at 5;6 had significant impairments in all aspects of spoken and written language functioning, as did children classified as having a general delay. These children fell further and further behind their peer group in vocabulary growth over time.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Rehabil Med
                Ann Rehabil Med
                Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
                Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
                2234-0645
                2234-0653
                October 2022
                31 October 2022
                : 46
                : 5
                : 256-262
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine–Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine–Research Institute of Convergence for Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Yong Beom Shin, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine–Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49241, Korea. Tel: +82–51-240-7485, Fax: +82–51-247-7484, E-mail: yi0314@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-0559
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0156-576X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-6212
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-3891
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6557-3801
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4056-800X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5026-1696
                Article
                arm-22045
                10.5535/arm.22045
                9650371
                36353838
                2267536f-7cc5-4462-aafe-490ba7b3e6ea
                Copyright © 2022 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 April 2022
                : 16 August 2022
                : 22 August 2022
                Categories
                Original Article

                Medicine
                child language,developmental language disorders,language tests
                Medicine
                child language, developmental language disorders, language tests

                Comments

                Comment on this article