5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of GLP-1 agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors during pregnancy and lactation on offspring outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims/hypothesis

          Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are novel drugs which have recently seen rapid uptake in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. The paucity of data regarding their safety during pregnancy and lactation causes a dilemma for the physician. The aim of the present study was to systematically review all available data on the offspring effects of GLP-1 agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors during pregnancy and lactation.

          Methods

          We systematically searched PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, FDA and EMA product information on GLP-1 agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors in pregnancy and lactation from inception up to 19 April 2022 without language restrictions. We approached both the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb on January 17 th 2023 and the Teratology Information Service (TIS) of Switzerland on February 6 th 2023. Eligible studies investigating the safety (including congenital anomalies, fetal growth, perinatal demise) in animals or humans, or reporting the degree of transfer of these drugs to the fetus, breast milk or breastfed neonate. Two reviewers independently assessed and selected studies for inclusion and subsequently resolved discrepancies by discussion.

          Results

          We included 39 records (n=9 theoretical; based on drug properties, n=7 human; n=23 animal, including 76 human offspring, and an unknown number of animal offspring as these numbers could not be retrieved from the FDA and EMA product information). In animal studies, GLP1-agonists were associated with reduced fetal weight and/or growth, delayed ossification and skeletal variants, usually associated with a reduction in maternal weight gain and decreased food consumption. Exendin-4 (GLP1-agonist) was not transported across the maternal-fetal placental interface. In human studies, exenatide (GLP1-agonist) showed a fetal-to-maternal peptide concentration ratio of ≤ 0.017 in ex vivo human placental perfusion in a single placenta. Liraglutide (GLP1-agonist) showed no significant maternal to fetal transfer at least 3.5 hours after maternal exposure in a human study with one subject. In animal studies, GLP-1 agonists were excreted in breast milk; human data on excretion were not available. In animal studies, SGLT2 inhibitors were generally safe during the first trimester but exposure during postnatal day 21 to 90 in juvenile rats, a period coinciding with the late second and third trimester of human renal development, caused dilatation of the renal pelvis and tubules. Human data consisted of a pharmaceutical database of inadvertent pregnancies during SGLT2 inhibitor use, which found an increase in miscarriages and congenital malformations. In animal studies SGLT2 inhibitors were excreted in breast milk and affected neonatal growth, but human data are not available.

          Conclusion/interpretation

          We found evidence for adverse offspring effects of GLP-1 agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors also in human studies. Our findings broadly support the advice to discontinue GLP-1 agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors during pregnancy and lactation, and also support the ongoing registration of pregnancy outcomes in pharmacological databases since the amount of available data is scarce and mostly limited to animal studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.

          The effects of empagliflozin, an inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, in addition to standard care, on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk are not known.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

            The cardiovascular effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, when added to standard care in patients with type 2 diabetes, remains unknown.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies

              Background Systematic Reviews (SRs) of experimental animal studies are not yet common practice, but awareness of the merits of conducting such SRs is steadily increasing. As animal intervention studies differ from randomized clinical trials (RCT) in many aspects, the methodology for SRs of clinical trials needs to be adapted and optimized for animal intervention studies. The Cochrane Collaboration developed a Risk of Bias (RoB) tool to establish consistency and avoid discrepancies in assessing the methodological quality of RCTs. A similar initiative is warranted in the field of animal experimentation. Methods We provide an RoB tool for animal intervention studies (SYRCLE’s RoB tool). This tool is based on the Cochrane RoB tool and has been adjusted for aspects of bias that play a specific role in animal intervention studies. To enhance transparency and applicability, we formulated signalling questions to facilitate judgment. Results The resulting RoB tool for animal studies contains 10 entries. These entries are related to selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and other biases. Half these items are in agreement with the items in the Cochrane RoB tool. Most of the variations between the two tools are due to differences in design between RCTs and animal studies. Shortcomings in, or unfamiliarity with, specific aspects of experimental design of animal studies compared to clinical studies also play a role. Conclusions SYRCLE’s RoB tool is an adapted version of the Cochrane RoB tool. Widespread adoption and implementation of this tool will facilitate and improve critical appraisal of evidence from animal studies. This may subsequently enhance the efficiency of translating animal research into clinical practice and increase awareness of the necessity of improving the methodological quality of animal studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front. Endocrinol.
                Frontiers in Endocrinology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2392
                10 October 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1215356
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) Location University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [2] 2 Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [3] 3 Medical Library, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) Location University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [4] 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) Location University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [5] 5 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [6] 6 Amsterdam Reproduction and Development , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Bert B. Little, University of Louisville, United States

                Reviewed by: Oscar Lorenzo, Health Research Institute Foundation Jimenez Diaz (IIS-FJD), Spain; William J. Massey, Cleveland Clinic, United States; Gregory Westcott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, United States

                *Correspondence: Dion R. P. Muller, d.r.muller@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl
                Article
                10.3389/fendo.2023.1215356
                10597691
                37881498
                223957b2-3a20-4064-ba99-d91dd13cce49
                Copyright © 2023 Muller, Stenvers, Malekzadeh, Holleman, Painter and Siegelaar

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 May 2023
                : 25 September 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 9, Words: 4133
                Funding
                No external funding was received.
                Categories
                Endocrinology
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Clinical Diabetes

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                diabetes,pregnancy,systematic review,glp-1 agonist,sglt2 inhibitor,lactation
                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                diabetes, pregnancy, systematic review, glp-1 agonist, sglt2 inhibitor, lactation

                Comments

                Comment on this article