320
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Using Pressurized Aerosol as an Alternative to Liquid Solution: First Evidence for Efficacy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is an unmet medical need. Despite recent improvements, systemic chemotherapy has limited efficacy. We report the first application of intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol in human patients.

          Methods

          Three end-stage patients with advanced PC from gastric, appendiceal, and ovarian origin were treated as a compassionate therapy. All patients had received previous systemic chemotherapy. A pressurized aerosol of CO 2 loaded with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m 2 and cisplatin 7.5 mg/m 2 (pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, PIPAC) was applied into the abdomen for 30 min at a pressure of 12 mmHg and a temperature of 37 °C.

          Results

          No side-effects >2 CTCAE were observed, and the procedures were well tolerated. Early hospital discharge was possible (days 2–5). Nuclear presence of doxorubicin was documented throughout the peritoneum, reaching high local concentration (≤4.1 μmol/g) and plasma concentration was low (4.0–6.2 ng/ml). PIPAC created no significant adhesions, could be repeated, and was applied 6×, 4×, and 2×. Two patients showed a complete and one a partial histological remission. Mean survival after the first PIPAC was 288 days. One patient is alive after 567 days.

          Conclusions

          PIPAC shows superior pharmacological properties with high local concentration and low systemic exposure. PIPAC can induce regression of PC in chemoresistant tumors, using 10 % of a usual systemic dose.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3213-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis treated with surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 523 patients from a multicentric French study.

          PURPOSE Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer traditionally is considered a terminal condition. Approaches that combine cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) have been developed recently. The purpose of this study was to assess early and long-term survival in patients treated with that strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective-cohort, multicentric study from French-speaking countries was performed. All consecutive patients with PC from colorectal cancer who were treated with CRS and PIC (with or without hyperthermia) were included. Patients with PC of appendiceal origin were excluded. Results The study included 523 patients from 23 centers in four French-speaking countries who underwent operation between 1990 and 2007. The median follow-up was 45 months. Mortality and grades 3 to 4 morbidity at 30 days were 3% and 31%, respectively. Overall median survival was 30.1 months. Five-year overall survival was 27%, and five-year disease-free survival was 10%. Complete CRS was performed in 84% of the patients, and median survival was 33 months. Positive independent prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analysis were complete CRS, PC that was limited in extent, no invaded lymph nodes, and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Neither the grade of disease nor the presence of liver metastases had a significant prognostic impact. CONCLUSION This combined treatment approach against PC achieved low postoperative morbidity and mortality, and it provided good long-term survival in patients with peritoneal scores lower than 20. These results should improve in the future, because the different teams involved will gain experience. This approach, when feasible, is now considered the gold standard in the French guidelines.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device.

            Two significant limitations of intraperitoneal drug therapy are limited drug distribution and poor penetration into peritoneal nodules. A possible solution is the application of the so-called "therapeutic pneumoperitoneum," taking advantage of the gaseous nature and the pressure of capnoperitoneum during laparoscopy. Our objective was to develop a device able to apply such therapeutic pneumoperitoneum. The technology presented here is a spraying device and can be introduced through a trocar. It is driven by mechanical pressure and consists of an injector, a line, and a nozzle. An in vivo experimental study was performed in five pigs. A transvaginal cholecystectomy was performed. At the end of the procedure, a standard dose of methylene blue was sprayed/infused into the abdominal cavity for 30 min (4 test animals w/therapeutic pneumoperitoneum (12 mmHg CO(2)) and 1 control animal w/conventional lavage (2 l intra-abdominal volume with extracorporeal circulation)). At the end of the procedure, all animals were autopsied and the peritoneum was analyzed. Outcome criteria were: (1) drug distribution (as assessed by the stained peritoneal surface at autopsy), and (2) diffusion into the peritoneum (presence or not of macroscopic staining of the outer aspect of the peritoneum immediately after surgery). Stained peritoneal surface was larger after aerosol application compared with peritoneal lavage, and staining more intense. Hidden peritoneal surfaces and the anterior abdominal wall were stained only in the aerosol group. In contrast to peritoneal lavage, the outer aspect of peritoneal membrane was immediately stained after pressurized spraying. This device and the related approach significantly improve both distribution and penetration of a test substance into the peritoneal cavity in a large animal model. This might be a significant progress in treating intraperitoneal disease, in particular peritoneal carcinomatosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacokinetic problems in peritoneal drug administration: tissue penetration and surface exposure.

              Both theory and clinical studies demonstrate that drug concentrations in the peritoneal cavity can greatly exceed concentrations in the plasma following intraperitoneal administration. This regional advantage has been associated with clinical activity, including surgically documented complete responses in ovarian cancer patients with persistent or recurrent disease following systemic therapy, and has produced a survival advantage in a recent phase III trial. Two pharmacokinetic problems appear to limit the effectiveness of intraperitoneal therapy: poor tumor penetration by the drug and incomplete irrigation of serosal surfaces by the drug-containing solution. We have examined these problems in the context of a very simple, spatially distributed model. If D is the diffusivity of the drug in a tissue adjacent to the peritoneal cavity and k is the rate constant for removal of the drug from the tissue by capillary blood, the model predicts that (for slowly reacting drugs) the characteristic penetration distance is (D/k)1/2 and the apparent permeability of the surface of a peritoneal structure is (Dk)1/2. The permeability-area product used in classical pharmacokinetic calculations for the peritoneal cavity as a whole is the sum of the products of the tissue-specific permeabilities and the relevant superficial surface areas. Since the model is mechanistic, it provides insight into the expected effect of procedures such as pharmacologic manipulation or physical mixing. We observe that large changes in tissue penetration may be difficult to achieve but that we have very little information on the transport characteristics within tumors in this setting or their response to vasoactive drugs. Enhanced mixing is likely to offer significant potential for improved therapy; however, procedures easily applicable to the clinical setting have not been adequately investigated and should be given high priority. Clinical studies indicate that an increase in irrigated area may be achieved in many patients by individualizing the dialysate volume and consideration of patient position.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marc.reymond@yahoo.de
                Journal
                Ann Surg Oncol
                Ann. Surg. Oncol
                Annals of Surgical Oncology
                Springer US (Boston )
                1068-9265
                1534-4681
                5 September 2013
                5 September 2013
                2014
                : 21
                : 553-559
                Affiliations
                [ ]Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [ ]Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
                [ ]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [ ]Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology and Hematology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [ ]Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                Article
                3213
                10.1245/s10434-013-3213-1
                3929768
                24006094
                21aaf1ea-398f-41da-8059-a06b750128b2
                © The Author(s) 2013

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 23 April 2013
                Categories
                Gastrointestinal Oncology
                Custom metadata
                © Society of Surgical Oncology 2014

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article