1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sensitivity, Specificity, and Cutoff Identifying Optic Atrophy by Macular Ganglion Cell Layer Volume in Syndromic Craniosynostosis

      , , , , ,
      Ophthalmology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effectiveness of papilledema as an indicator of raised intracranial pressure in children with craniosynostosis.

          Craniosynostosis management partially depends on the detection and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Examination for papilledema is considered to be the most reliable screening method for identifying raised ICP, but its effectiveness has not been defined. One hundred and twenty-two children with craniosynostosis who underwent funduscopic examinations and then Camino ICP monitoring were studied. All eye examinations were performed by an ophthalmologist after pharmacological pupillary dilation. Fifteen patients (12%) had papilledema. Subsequent ICP monitoring showed that the median ICP was 12.7 mm Hg, with 41 patients (34%) having elevated ICPs (> 15 mm Hg). Those with papilledema had higher ICPs (17.5 +/- 3.2 versus 12.7 +/- 5.5 mm Hg), were older (5.9 +/- 4.7 versus 1.9 +/- 2.6 years), and were more likely to have craniofacial syndromes (73 versus 41%) than those without papilledema (P < 0.05). Patients with both elevated ICPs and papilledema were older (5.9 +/- 4.7 versus 1.6 +/- 1.4 years) and more likely to have multiple-suture synostosis (92 versus 61%) than those with elevated ICPs and no papilledema (P < 0.05). The presence of papilledema was a specific (98%) indicator of raised ICP, but its sensitivity was age-dependent. It was 100% sensitive in children older than 8 years, but it indicated elevated ICP in only 22% of younger patients. These results suggest that ICP monitoring to document elevated ICP is unnecessary in children older than 8 years who have detailed ophthalmological examinations. In the younger child, the presence of papilledema reliably indicates elevated ICP but its absence does not rule out elevated ICP; formal ICP measurement has a greater role in detecting elevated ICP in these patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Optical coherence tomography retinal ganglion cell complex analysis for the detection of early chiasmal compression

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer thickness and vision loss in young children with optic pathway gliomas.

              To determine if measures of macular ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness can discriminate between children with and without vision loss (visual acuity or field) from their optic pathway glioma (OPG) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Ophthalmology
                Ophthalmology
                Elsevier BV
                01616420
                March 2024
                March 2024
                : 131
                : 3
                : 341-348
                Article
                10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.09.022
                21a35d79-e291-4082-ad44-187c18dc0779
                © 2024

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article