10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lynch syndrome cancer vaccines: A roadmap for the development of precision immunoprevention strategies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) account for 5~10% of all cancer diagnosis. Lynch syndrome (LS) is one of the most common HCS, caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Even with prospective cancer surveillance, LS is associated with up to 50% lifetime risk of colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. While significant progress has been made in the timely identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers and monitoring and early detection of precancerous lesions, cancer-risk reduction strategies are still centered around endoscopic or surgical removal of neoplastic lesions and susceptible organs. Safe and effective cancer prevention strategies are critically needed to improve the life quality and longevity of LS and other HCS carriers. The era of precision oncology driven by recent technological advances in tumor molecular profiling and a better understanding of genetic risk factors has transformed cancer prevention approaches for at-risk individuals, including LS carriers. MMR deficiency leads to the accumulation of insertion and deletion mutations in microsatellites (MS), which are particularly prone to DNA polymerase slippage during DNA replication. Mutations in coding MS give rise to frameshift peptides (FSP) that are recognized by the immune system as neoantigens. Due to clonal evolution, LS tumors share a set of recurrent and predictable FSP neoantigens in the same and in different LS patients. Cancer vaccines composed of commonly recurring FSP neoantigens selected through prediction algorithms have been clinically evaluated in LS carriers and proven safe and immunogenic. Preclinically analogous FSP vaccines have been shown to elicit FSP-directed immune responses and exert tumor-preventive efficacy in murine models of LS. While the immunopreventive efficacy of “off-the-shelf” vaccines consisting of commonly recurring FSP antigens is currently investigated in LS clinical trials, the feasibility and utility of personalized FSP vaccines with individual HLA-restricted epitopes are being explored for more precise targeting. Here, we discuss recent advances in precision cancer immunoprevention approaches, emerging enabling technologies, research gaps, and implementation barriers toward clinical translation of risk-tailored prevention strategies for LS carriers. We will also discuss the feasibility and practicality of next-generation cancer vaccines that are based on personalized immunogenic epitopes for precision cancer immunoprevention.

          Related collections

          Most cited references211

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

            Abstract Background Vaccines are needed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. The mRNA-1273 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle–encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19. Methods This phase 3 randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 99 centers across the United States. Persons at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or its complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo 28 days apart. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group). More than 96% of participants received both injections, and 2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline. Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001). Efficacy was similar across key secondary analyses, including assessment 14 days after the first dose, analyses that included participants who had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and analyses in participants 65 years of age or older. Severe Covid-19 occurred in 30 participants, with one fatality; all 30 were in the placebo group. Moderate, transient reactogenicity after vaccination occurred more frequently in the mRNA-1273 group. Serious adverse events were rare, and the incidence was similar in the two groups. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

              Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash a patient's own T cells to kill tumors, are revolutionizing cancer treatment. To unravel the genomic determinants of response to this therapy, we used whole-exome sequencing of non-small cell lung cancers treated with pembrolizumab, an antibody targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). In two independent cohorts, higher nonsynonymous mutation burden in tumors was associated with improved objective response, durable clinical benefit, and progression-free survival. Efficacy also correlated with the molecular smoking signature, higher neoantigen burden, and DNA repair pathway mutations; each factor was also associated with mutation burden. In one responder, neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses paralleled tumor regression, suggesting that anti-PD-1 therapy enhances neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity. Our results suggest that the genomic landscape of lung cancers shapes response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                22 March 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 1147590
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health , Rockville, MD, United States
                [2] 2 Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital , Heidelberg, Germany
                [3] 3 Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) , Heidelberg, Germany
                [4] 4 Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA, United States
                [5] 5 Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA, United States
                [6] 6 Broad Institute of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard , Cambridge, MA, United States
                [7] 7 Department of Computer Science, Metropolitan College, Boston University , Boston, MA, United States
                [8] 8 Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, United States
                [9] 9 Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark , Lyngby, Denmark
                [10] 10 Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College , New York, NY, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Inge Bernstein, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

                Reviewed by: Martyna Filipska, Fundació Institut Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Spain; Fiona Lalloo, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Shizuko Sei, seis@ 123456mail.nih.gov ; Steven M. Lipkin, stl2012@ 123456med.cornell.edu ; Matthias Kloor, Matthias.Kloor@ 123456med.uni-heidelberg.de

                This article was submitted to Cancer Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2023.1147590
                10073468
                37035178
                2171293e-bdce-4b4e-b473-e06ca296063d
                Copyright © 2023 Sei, Ahadova, Keskin, Bohaumilitzky, Gebert, von Knebel Doeberitz, Lipkin and Kloor

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 January 2023
                : 09 March 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 212, Pages: 17, Words: 8704
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health , doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: U54 CA 272688 , U01 CA233056
                Funded by: Deutsche Krebshilfe , doi 10.13039/501100005972;
                Award ID: 70113455
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft , doi 10.13039/501100001659;
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health , doi 10.13039/100000002;
                This work was supported by NIH grants U54 CA 272688 (DK, JG, MKD, SL, MK), U01 CA233056 (JG, MKD, SL, MK), and R01 HL157174 (DK), grants from German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, 70113455, 70113890), German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, GE 592-9/1), and Donations against Cancer, NCT Heidelberg, and contracts from NCI PREVENT program (HHSN2612015000391).
                Categories
                Oncology
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                lynch syndrome,dna mismatch repair deficiency,microsatellite instability,frameshift mutations,tumor neoantigens,cancer vaccines,immunoprevention,precision cancer prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article