17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health policy and systems research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia: a collaborative approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is a multi-disciplinary approach of generating health system and policy-level evidence. Setting HPSR agendas is considered as an efficient strategy to map and identify policy and cost-effective research topics, but its practice in developing countries is limited. This paper aimed to conduct a collaborative health policy and system research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia.

          Method

          The WHO’s plan, implement, publish, and evaluate (PIPE) framework and the Delphi technique were used to conduct the priority-setting exercise. The PIPE model was used to lead the priority-setting process from planning to evaluation, while the Delphi technique was used to run the rating and ranking exercise with the aim of reaching a consensus. Two rounds of expert panel workshops supplemented with an online survey were used for the HPSR agenda setting, rating and ranking purposes. Groups were formed using the WHO health system building blocks as a base framework to identify and prioritize the HPSR topics.

          Result

          Under 8 themes, 32 sub-themes and 182 HPSR topics were identified. The identified research themes include leadership management and governance, health policy, health information system, healthcare financing, human resource for health, medical products and supply, service delivery and cross-cutting issues.

          Conclusions

          Priority HPSR topics focussing on national health priority issues were identified. The identified topics were shared with policymakers and academic and research institutions. Evidence generation on the identified priority topics will guide future research endeavours and improve evidence-informed decision-making practice, health system performance and national health goals and targets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review

          Objective Delphi technique is a structured process commonly used to developed healthcare quality indicators, but there is a little recommendation for researchers who wish to use it. This study aimed 1) to describe reporting of the Delphi method to develop quality indicators, 2) to discuss specific methodological skills for quality indicators selection 3) to give guidance about this practice. Methodology and Main Finding Three electronic data bases were searched over a 30 years period (1978–2009). All articles that used the Delphi method to select quality indicators were identified. A standardized data extraction form was developed. Four domains (questionnaire preparation, expert panel, progress of the survey and Delphi results) were assessed. Of 80 included studies, quality of reporting varied significantly between items (9% for year's number of experience of the experts to 98% for the type of Delphi used). Reporting of methodological aspects needed to evaluate the reliability of the survey was insufficient: only 39% (31/80) of studies reported response rates for all rounds, 60% (48/80) that feedback was given between rounds, 77% (62/80) the method used to achieve consensus and 57% (48/80) listed quality indicators selected at the end of the survey. A modified Delphi procedure was used in 49/78 (63%) with a physical meeting of the panel members, usually between Delphi rounds. Median number of panel members was 17(Q1:11; Q3:31). In 40/70 (57%) studies, the panel included multiple stakeholders, who were healthcare professionals in 95% (38/40) of cases. Among 75 studies describing criteria to select quality indicators, 28 (37%) used validity and 17(23%) feasibility. Conclusion The use and reporting of the Delphi method for quality indicators selection need to be improved. We provide some guidance to the investigators to improve the using and reporting of the method in future surveys.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Framing the Questions

              In the first of a series of articles addressing the current challenges and opportunities for the development of Health Policy & Systems Research (HPSR), Kabir Sheikh and colleagues lay out the main questions vexing the field.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                getasewa23@gmail.com
                Journal
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Research Policy and Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1478-4505
                14 August 2024
                14 August 2024
                2024
                : 22
                : 107
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, ( https://ror.org/0595gz585) Gondar, Ethiopia
                [2 ]Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, ( https://ror.org/0595gz585) Gondar, Ethiopia
                [3 ]Center for Digital Health and Implementation Science, University of Gondar, ( https://ror.org/0595gz585) Gondar, Ethiopia
                [4 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, ( https://ror.org/0595gz585) Gondar, Ethiopia
                [5 ]Universal Health Coverage Life Course Cluster, Health Systems Team, World Health Organization Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                [6 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Jimma University, ( https://ror.org/05eer8g02) Jimma, Ethiopia
                [7 ]Department of Health Policy and Global Health, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, ( https://ror.org/02ax94a12) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                [8 ]Health System and Reproductive Health Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, ( https://ror.org/00xytbp33) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-9754
                Article
                1198
                10.1186/s12961-024-01198-4
                11323615
                39143597
                20d7dcd9-4bdf-4201-ab6d-2a20e7be483a
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 October 2023
                : 29 July 2024
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Health & Social care
                health policy and system research (hpsr),priority setting,delphi technique

                Comments

                Comment on this article