14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A focus on cytochrome P450, transporters, and acid suppression therapy : Pharmacokinetic interactions of TKIs

      1 , 1 , 1 , 2
      Hematological Oncology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references108

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Targeted cancer therapy.

          Disruption of the normal regulation of cell-cycle progression and division lies at the heart of the events leading to cancer. Complex networks of regulatory factors, the tumour microenvironment and stress signals, such as those resulting from damaged DNA, dictate whether cancer cells proliferate or die. Recent progress in understanding the molecular changes that underlie cancer development offer the prospect of specifically targeting malfunctioning molecules and pathways to achieve more effective and rational cancer therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Life Expectancy of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Approaches the Life Expectancy of the General Population.

            A dramatic improvement in the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) occurred after the introduction of imatinib mesylate, the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We assessed how these changes affected the life expectancy of patients with CML and life-years lost as a result of CML between 1973 and 2013 in Sweden.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

              No comprehensive systematic review has been published since 1998 about the frequency with which cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). MEDLINE, AMED, and Embase databases were searched for surveys published until January 2009. Surveys conducted in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, and the United States with at least 100 adult cancer patients were included. Detailed information on methods and results was independently extracted by 2 reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using a criteria list developed according to the STROBE guideline. Exploratory random effects metaanalysis and metaregression were applied. Studies from 18 countries (152; >65 000 cancer patients) were included. Heterogeneity of CAM use was high and to some extent explained by differences in survey methods. The combined prevalence for "current use" of CAM across all studies was 40%. The highest was in the United States and the lowest in Italy and the Netherlands. Metaanalysis suggested an increase in CAM use from an estimated 25% in the 1970s and 1980s to more than 32% in the 1990s and to 49% after 2000. The overall prevalence of CAM use found was lower than often claimed. However, there was some evidence that the use has increased considerably over the past years. Therefore, the health care systems ought to implement clear strategies of how to deal with this. To improve the validity and reporting of future surveys, the authors suggest criteria for methodological quality that should be fulfilled and reporting standards that should be required.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hematological Oncology
                Hematological Oncology
                Wiley
                02780232
                September 2017
                September 2017
                December 07 2016
                : 35
                : 3
                : 259-280
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pôle Pharmacie; Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Pharmacie; CHU de Rennes Rennes Cedex France
                [2 ]Laboratoire de Pharmacie Galénique, Biopharmacie et Pharmacie Clinique; IRSET U1085, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Rennes 1; Rennes Cedex France
                Article
                10.1002/hon.2335
                27925256
                1ff1e7c4-5ff2-49a7-9eac-9d61ff1c6251
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article