245
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    11
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has been used in an attempt to determine embryonic aneuploidy. Techniques that use new molecular methods to determine the karyotype of an embryo are expanding the scope of PGS.

          METHODS

          We introduce a new method for PGS, termed ‘parental support’, which leverages microarray measurements from parental DNA to ‘clean’ single-cell microarray measurements on embryonic cells and explicitly computes confidence in each copy number call. The method distinguishes mitotic and meiotic copy errors and determines parental source of aneuploidy.

          RESULTS

          Validation with 459 single cells of known karyotype indicated that per-cell false-positive and false-negative rates are roughly equivalent to the ‘gold standard’ metaphase karyotype. The majority of the cells were run in parallel with a clinical commercial PGS service. Computed confidences were conservative and roughly concordant with accuracy. To examine ploidy in human embryos, the method was then applied to 26 disaggregated, cryopreserved, cleavage-stage embryos for a total of 134 single blastomeres. Only 23.1% of the embryos were euploid, though 46.2% of embryos were mosaic euploid. Mosaicism affected 57.7% of the embryos. Counts of mitotic and meiotic errors were roughly equivalent. Maternal meiotic trisomy predominated over paternal trisomy, and maternal meiotic trisomies were negatively predictive of mosaic euploid embryos.

          CONCLUSIONS

          We have performed a major preclinical validation of a new method for PGS and found that the technology performs approximately as well as a metaphase karyotype. We also directly measured the mechanism of aneuploidy in cleavage-stage human embryos and found high rates and distinct patterns of mitotic and meiotic aneuploidy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

          Chromosome instability is a hallmark of tumorigenesis. This study establishes that chromosome instability is also common during early human embryogenesis. A new array-based method allowed screening of genome-wide copy number and loss of heterozygosity in single cells. This revealed not only mosaicism for whole-chromosome aneuploidies and uniparental disomies in most cleavage-stage embryos but also frequent segmental deletions, duplications and amplifications that were reciprocal in sister blastomeres, implying the occurrence of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. This explains the low human fecundity and identifies post-zygotic chromosome instability as a leading cause of constitutional chromosomal disorders.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes.

            The use of genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays for high resolution molecular cytogenetic analysis using a combination of quantitative and genotype analysis is well established. This study demonstrates that by Mendelian analysis of the SNP genotypes of the parents and a sibling or other appropriate family member to establish phase, it is possible to identify informative loci for each of the four parental haplotypes across each chromosome and map the inheritance of these haplotypes and the position of any crossovers in the proband. The resulting 'karyomap', unlike a karyotype, identifies the parental and grandparental origin of each chromosome and chromosome segment and is unique for every individual being defined by the independent segregation of parental chromosomes and the pattern of non-recombinant and recombinant chromosomes. Karyomapping, therefore, enables both genome wide linkage based analysis of inheritance and detection of chromosome imbalance where either both haplotypes from one parent are present (trisomy) or neither are present (monosomy/deletion). The study also demonstrates that karyomapping is possible at the single cell level following whole genome amplification and, without any prior patient or disease specific test development, provides a universal linkage based methodology for preimplantation genetic diagnosis readily available worldwide.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)'.

              Among the many educational materials produced by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) are guidelines. ESHRE guidelines may be developed for many reasons but their intent is always to promote best quality practices in reproductive medicine. In an era in which preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become a reality, we must strive to maintain its efficacy and credibility by offering the safest and most effective treatment available. The dominant motivators for the development of current comprehensive guidelines for best PGD practice were (i) the absence of guidelines and/or regulation for PGD in many countries and (ii) the observation that no consensus exists on many of the clinical and technical aspects of PGD. As a consequence, the ESHRE PGD Consortium undertook to draw up guidelines aimed at giving information, support and guidance to potential, fledgling and established PGD centres. The success of a PGD treatment cycle is the result of great attention to detail. We have strived to provide a similar level of detail in this document and hope that it will assist staff in achieving the best clinical outcome for their patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Reprod
                humrep
                humrep
                Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
                Oxford University Press
                0268-1161
                1460-2350
                April 2010
                24 January 2010
                24 January 2010
                : 25
                : 4
                : 1066-1075
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleGene Security Network, Inc. , 2686 Middlefield Road, Suite C, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
                [2 ]simpleGenome Technology Center, Stanford University , 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
                [3 ]simpleLa Jolla IVF , 9850 Genesee Avenue No. 610, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
                [4 ]simpleBoston IVF , 130 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
                [5 ]Huntington Reproductive Center, 23961 Calle de la Magdalena, Suite 503, Laguna Hills, CA 92653, USA
                [6 ]Obstetrics and Gynecology, simpleStanford University Medical Center , 900 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
                [7 ]simpleSchool of Engineering, Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305, USA
                Author notes
                [8 ]Correspondence address. E-mail: djohnson@ 123456genesecurity.net
                Article
                dep452
                10.1093/humrep/dep452
                2839907
                20100701
                1fd993b9-fa16-4581-9298-cb7d9124fcbd
                © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 August 2008
                : 19 November 2009
                : 23 November 2009
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Reproductive genetics

                Human biology
                segmental imbalance,aneuploidy,in vitro fertilization,preimplantation genetic screening,microarray

                Comments

                Comment on this article