1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Implications for Electronic Surveys in Inpatient Settings Based on Patient Survey Response Patterns: Cross-Sectional Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

           Surveys of hospitalized patients are important for research and learning about unobservable medical issues (eg, mental health, quality of life, and symptoms), but there has been little work examining survey data quality in this population whose capacity to respond to survey items may differ from the general population.

          Objective

           The aim of this study is to determine what factors drive response rates, survey drop-offs, and missing data in surveys of hospitalized patients.

          Methods

           Cross-sectional surveys were distributed on an inpatient tablet to patients in a large, midwestern US hospital. Three versions were tested: 1 with 174 items and 2 with 111 items; one 111-item version had missing item reminders that prompted participants when they did not answer items. Response rate, drop-off rate (abandoning survey before completion), and item missingness (skipping items) were examined to investigate data quality. Chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meyer survival curves, and distribution charts were used to compare data quality among survey versions. Response duration was computed for each version.

          Results

          Overall, 2981 patients responded. Response rate did not differ between the 174- and 111-item versions (81.7% vs 83%, P=.53). Drop-off was significantly reduced when the survey was shortened (65.7% vs 20.2% of participants dropped off, P<.001). Approximately one-quarter of participants dropped off by item 120, with over half dropping off by item 158. The percentage of participants with missing data decreased substantially when missing item reminders were added (77.2% vs 31.7% of participants, P<.001). The mean percentage of items with missing data was reduced in the shorter survey (40.7% vs 20.3% of items missing); with missing item reminders, the percentage of items with missing data was further reduced (20.3% vs 11.7% of items missing). Across versions, for the median participant, each item added 24.6 seconds to a survey’s duration.

          Conclusions

           Hospitalized patients may have a higher tolerance for longer surveys than the general population, but surveys given to hospitalized patients should have a maximum of 120 items to ensure high rates of completion. Missing item prompts should be used to reduce missing data. Future research should examine generalizability to nonhospitalized individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment.

              To study the effects of several survey features on response rates in a general population health survey.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                2023
                1 November 2023
                : 25
                : e48236
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Biomedical Informatics College of Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus, OH United States
                [2 ] The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking in Health Services and Implementation Science Research (CATALYST) College of Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus, OH United States
                [3 ] Department of Family and Community Medicine College of Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus, OH United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Ann Scheck McAlearney Ann.McAlearney@ 123456osumc.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-6886
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-3808
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-3564
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-5419
                Article
                v25i1e48236
                10.2196/48236
                10652193
                37910163
                1f6cad35-b493-459d-b30f-6e6c18bb9380
                ©Megan E Gregory, Lindsey N Sova, Timothy R Huerta, Ann Scheck McAlearney. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 01.11.2023.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 16 April 2023
                : 18 July 2023
                : 24 August 2023
                : 31 August 2023
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                Medicine
                surveys,patient satisfaction,patient experience,patient surveys,electronic survey,cross-sectional study,quality of life,mental health,symptoms,data quality,hospitalization

                Comments

                Comment on this article