0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Plasma metabolites distinguish dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional metabolomic analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In multifactorial diseases, alterations in the concentration of metabolites can identify novel pathological mechanisms at the intersection between genetic and environmental influences. This study aimed to profile the plasma metabolome of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), two neurodegenerative disorders for which our understanding of the pathophysiology is incomplete. In the clinical setting, DLB is often mistaken for AD, highlighting a need for accurate diagnostic biomarkers. We therefore also aimed to determine the overlapping and differentiating metabolite patterns associated with each and establish whether identification of these patterns could be leveraged as biomarkers to support clinical diagnosis.

          Methods

          A panel of 630 metabolites (Biocrates MxP Quant 500) and a further 232 metabolism indicators (biologically informative sums and ratios calculated from measured metabolites, each indicative for a specific pathway or synthesis; MetaboINDICATOR) were analyzed in plasma from patients with probable DLB ( n = 15; age 77.6 ± 8.2 years), probable AD ( n = 15; 76.1 ± 6.4 years), and age-matched cognitively healthy controls (HC; n = 15; 75.2 ± 6.9 years). Metabolites were quantified using a reversed-phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography column and triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, or by using flow injection analysis in MRM mode. Data underwent multivariate (PCA analysis), univariate and receiving operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Metabolite data were also correlated (Spearman r) with the collected clinical neuroimaging and protein biomarker data.

          Results

          The PCA plot separated DLB, AD and HC groups (R2 = 0.518, Q2 = 0.348). Significant alterations in 17 detected metabolite parameters were identified ( q ≤ 0.05), including neurotransmitters, amino acids and glycerophospholipids. Glutamine (Glu; q = 0.045) concentrations and indicators of sphingomyelin hydroxylation ( q = 0.039) distinguished AD and DLB, and these significantly correlated with semi-quantitative measurement of cardiac sympathetic denervation. The most promising biomarker differentiating AD from DLB was Glu:lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC a 24:0) ratio (AUC = 0.92; 95%CI 0.809–0.996; sensitivity = 0.90; specificity = 0.90).

          Discussion

          Several plasma metabolomic aberrations are shared by both DLB and AD, but a rise in plasma glutamine was specific to DLB. When measured against plasma lysoPC a C24:0, glutamine could differentiate DLB from AD, and the reproducibility of this biomarker should be investigated in larger cohorts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

          The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of revising the 1984 criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. The workgroup sought to ensure that the revised criteria would be flexible enough to be used by both general healthcare providers without access to neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, and specialized investigators involved in research or in clinical trial studies who would have these tools available. We present criteria for all-cause dementia and for AD dementia. We retained the general framework of probable AD dementia from the 1984 criteria. On the basis of the past 27 years of experience, we made several changes in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis. We also retained the term possible AD dementia, but redefined it in a manner more focused than before. Biomarker evidence was also integrated into the diagnostic formulations for probable and possible AD dementia for use in research settings. The core clinical criteria for AD dementia will continue to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in clinical practice, but biomarker evidence is expected to enhance the pathophysiological specificity of the diagnosis of AD dementia. Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of AD dementia. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            “Mini-mental state”

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/519581/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1052141/overviewRole: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1255252/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/22853/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/462606/overviewRole: Role:
                Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/498336/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2273297/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Aging Neurosci
                Front Aging Neurosci
                Front. Aging Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-4365
                04 January 2024
                2023
                : 15
                : 1326780
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast , Belfast, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [4] 4Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology , London, United Kingdom
                [5] 5Dementia Research Institute, UCL , London, United Kingdom
                [6] 6Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg, Sweden
                [7] 7Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Mölndal, Sweden
                [8] 8Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases , Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
                [9] 9Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI, United States
                [10] 10Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast , Belfast, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Omar M. El-Agnaf, Hamad bin Khalifa University, Qatar

                Reviewed by: Yutaka Oji, Juntendo University, Japan; Matteo Cotta Ramusino, Neurological Institute Foundation Casimiro Mondino (IRCCS), Italy

                *Correspondence: Joseph P. M. Kane, joseph.kane@ 123456qub.ac.uk

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fnagi.2023.1326780
                10794326
                38239488
                1f2de3df-bdf0-4b96-89cd-d72137bc3918
                Copyright © 2024 Pan, Donaghy, Roberts, Chouliaras, O’Brien, Thomas, Heslegrave, Zetterberg, McGuinness, Passmore, Green and Kane.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 October 2023
                : 11 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 67, Pages: 13, Words: 8766
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council, doi 10.13039/501100000265;
                Award ID: W000229
                Funded by: Alzheimer’s Research UK, doi 10.13039/501100002283;
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research, doi 10.13039/501100000272;
                Funded by: Swedish Research Council, doi 10.13039/501100004359;
                Funded by: Alzheimer’s Association
                Funded by: Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor, doi 10.13039/100010815;
                Funded by: European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
                Funded by: Marie Skłodowska-Curie
                Funded by: University College London, doi 10.13039/501100000765;
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by an Alzheimer’s Research UK Northern Ireland Network grant and supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre. PD is supported by the Medical Research Council [grant number MR/W000229/1]. HZ is a Wallenberg Scholar supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2022–01018 and #2019–02397), the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101053962, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-71320), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA (#201809–2016862), the AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer’s Association (#ADSF-21-831376-C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, and #ADSF-21-831377-C), the Bluefield Project, the Olav Thon Foundation, the Erling-Persson Family Foundation, Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor, Hjärnfonden, Sweden (#FO2022-0270), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 860197 (MIRIADE), the European Union Joint Program – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND2021-00694), the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, and the UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (UKDRI-1003).
                Categories
                Aging Neuroscience
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

                Neurosciences
                dementia,lewy body dementia,alzheimer’s disease,metabolomic analyses,biomarkers
                Neurosciences
                dementia, lewy body dementia, alzheimer’s disease, metabolomic analyses, biomarkers

                Comments

                Comment on this article