4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Effectiveness of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in People with Cystic Fibrosis: A Clinical Trial

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 1 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 7 , 17 , 18 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 17 , 18 , 19
      American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
      American Thoracic Society
      cystic fibrosis, clinical trial, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, PROMISE, modulators

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale

          The cystic fibrosis (CF) modulator drug, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), proved highly effective in controlled clinical trials for individuals with at least one F508del allele, which occurs in at least 85% of people with CF.

          Objectives

          PROMISE is a postapproval study to understand the broad effects of ETI through 30 months’ clinical use in a more diverse U.S. patient population with planned analyses after 6 months.

          Methods

          Prospective, observational study in 487 people with CF age 12 years or older with at least one F508del allele starting ETI for the first time. Assessments occurred before and 1, 3, and 6 months into ETI therapy. Outcomes included change in percent predicted FEV 1 (ppFEV 1), sweat chloride concentration, body mass index (BMI), and self-reported respiratory symptoms.

          Measurements and Main Results

          Average age was 25.1 years, and 44.1% entered the study using tezacaftor/ivacaftor or lumacaftor/ivacaftor, whereas 6.7% were using ivacaftor, consistent with F508del homozygosity and G551D allele, respectively. At 6 months into ETI therapy, ppFEV 1 improved 9.76 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.76 to 10.76) from baseline, cystic fibrosis questionnaire–revised respiratory domain score improved 20.4 points (95% CI, 18.3 to 22.5), and sweat chloride decreased −41.7 mmol/L (95% CI, −43.8 to −39.6). BMI also significantly increased. Changes were larger in those naive to modulators but substantial in all groups, including those treated with ivacaftor at baseline.

          Conclusions

          ETI by clinical prescription provided large improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, and BMI in a diverse population naive to modulator drug therapy, using existing two-drug combinations, or using ivacaftor alone. Each group also experienced significant reductions in sweat chloride concentration, which correlated with improved ppFEV 1 in the overall study population.

          Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT NCT04038047).

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations.

            The aim of the Task Force was to derive continuous prediction equations and their lower limits of normal for spirometric indices, which are applicable globally. Over 160,000 data points from 72 centres in 33 countries were shared with the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Function Initiative. Eliminating data that could not be used (mostly missing ethnic group, some outliers) left 97,759 records of healthy nonsmokers (55.3% females) aged 2.5-95 yrs. Lung function data were collated and prediction equations derived using the LMS method, which allows simultaneous modelling of the mean (mu), the coefficient of variation (sigma) and skewness (lambda) of a distribution family. After discarding 23,572 records, mostly because they could not be combined with other ethnic or geographic groups, reference equations were derived for healthy individuals aged 3-95 yrs for Caucasians (n=57,395), African-Americans (n=3,545), and North (n=4,992) and South East Asians (n=8,255). Forced expiratory value in 1 s (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between ethnic groups differed proportionally from that in Caucasians, such that FEV(1)/FVC remained virtually independent of ethnic group. For individuals not represented by these four groups, or of mixed ethnic origins, a composite equation taken as the average of the above equations is provided to facilitate interpretation until a more appropriate solution is developed. Spirometric prediction equations for the 3-95-age range are now available that include appropriate age-dependent lower limits of normal. They can be applied globally to different ethnic groups. Additional data from the Indian subcontinent and Arabic, Polynesian and Latin American countries, as well as Africa will further improve these equations in the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement

              Background: Spirometry is the most common pulmonary function test. It is widely used in the assessment of lung function to provide objective information used in the diagnosis of lung diseases and monitoring lung health. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society jointly adopted technical standards for conducting spirometry. Improvements in instrumentation and computational capabilities, together with new research studies and enhanced quality assurance approaches, have led to the need to update the 2005 technical standards for spirometry to take full advantage of current technical capabilities. Methods: This spirometry technical standards document was developed by an international joint task force, appointed by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, with expertise in conducting and analyzing pulmonary function tests, laboratory quality assurance, and developing international standards. A comprehensive review of published evidence was performed. A patient survey was developed to capture patients’ experiences. Results: Revisions to the 2005 technical standards for spirometry were made, including the addition of factors that were not previously considered. Evidence to support the revisions was cited when applicable. The experience and expertise of task force members were used to develop recommended best practices. Conclusions: Standards and consensus recommendations are presented for manufacturers, clinicians, operators, and researchers with the aims of increasing the accuracy, precision, and quality of spirometric measurements and improving the patient experience. A comprehensive guide to aid in the implementation of these standards was developed as an online supplement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                On behalf of : for the PROMISE Study Group
                Journal
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                ajrccm
                American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
                American Thoracic Society
                1073-449X
                1535-4970
                16 November 2021
                1 March 2022
                16 November 2021
                : 205
                : 5
                : 529-539
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Pediatrics, and
                [ 7 ]Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;
                [ 2 ]Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics Development Network Coordinating Center, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington;
                [ 3 ]Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
                [ 4 ]Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York;
                [ 5 ]Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
                [ 6 ]Western New York Pediatric Gastroenterology, Buffalo, New York;
                [ 8 ]Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
                [ 9 ]Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
                [ 10 ]Digestive Health Institute, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado;
                [ 11 ]Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado;
                [ 12 ]Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
                [ 13 ]Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Translational Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
                [ 14 ]Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;
                [ 15 ]Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado;
                [ 16 ]Department of Pediatrics, Masonic Children’s Hospital, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota;
                [ 17 ]Department of Medicine,
                [ 18 ]The Gregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama;
                [ 19 ]Department of Pediatrics; and
                [ 20 ]The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland
                Author notes
                Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to David P. Nichols, M.D., 1920 Terry Avenue, Building Cure Room 4-209, Seattle, WA 98101. E-mail: David.Nichols@ 123456seattlechildrens.org .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8611-7960
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6172-4465
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-0133
                Article
                202108-1986OC
                10.1164/rccm.202108-1986OC
                8906485
                34784492
                1f27c13c-beaf-49ce-a4a3-667c8271e3ee
                Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society

                This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0. For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern ( dgern@ 123456thoracic.org ).

                History
                : 27 August 2021
                : 16 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, References: 49, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, doi 10.13039/100000897;
                Funded by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, doi 10.13039/100000062;
                Award ID: P30DK072482
                Award ID: P30DK089507
                Funded by: NHLBI, doi 10.13039/100000050;
                Award ID: R35HL135816
                Award ID: UL1TR003096
                Award ID: UL1 TR002535
                Award ID: K24HL14166
                Award ID: K08HL138153
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Cystic Fibrosis

                cystic fibrosis,clinical trial,elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor,promise,modulators

                Comments

                Comment on this article