8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tumor development and metastasis are facilitated by the complex interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment, which comprises stromal cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, among other factors. Stromal cells can adopt new phenotypes to promote tumor cell invasion. A deep understanding of the signaling pathways involved in cell‐to‐cell and cell‐to‐ECM interactions is needed to design effective intervention strategies that might interrupt these interactions. In this review, we describe the tumor microenvironment (TME) components and associated therapeutics. We discuss the clinical advances in the prevalent and newly discovered signaling pathways in the TME, the immune checkpoints and immunosuppressive chemokines, and currently used inhibitors targeting these pathways. These include both intrinsic and non‐autonomous tumor cell signaling pathways in the TME: protein kinase C (PKC) signaling, Notch, and transforming growth factor (TGF‐β) signaling, Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress response, lactate signaling, Metabolic reprogramming, cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS)–stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and Siglec signaling pathways. We also discuss the recent advances in Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD‐1), Cytotoxic T‐Lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA4), T‐cell immunoglobulin mucin‐3 (TIM‐3) and Lymphocyte Activating Gene 3 (LAG3) immune checkpoint inhibitors along with the C‐C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)‐ C‐C class chemokines 22 (CCL22)/ and 17 (CCL17), C‐C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2)‐ chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), C‐C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5)‐ chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 3 (CCL3) chemokine signaling axis in the TME. In addition, this review provides a holistic understanding of the TME as we discuss the three‐dimensional and microfluidic models of the TME, which are believed to recapitulate the original characteristics of the patient tumor and hence may be used as a platform to study new mechanisms and screen for various anti‐cancer therapies. We further discuss the systemic influences of gut microbiota in TME reprogramming and treatment response. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the diverse and most critical signaling pathways in the TME, highlighting the associated newest and critical preclinical and clinical studies along with their underlying biology. We highlight the importance of the most recent technologies of microfluidics and lab‐on‐chip models for TME research and also present an overview of extrinsic factors, such as the inhabitant human microbiome, which have the potential to modulate TME biology and drug responses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references438

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation

          The hallmarks of cancer comprise six biological capabilities acquired during the multistep development of human tumors. The hallmarks constitute an organizing principle for rationalizing the complexities of neoplastic disease. They include sustaining proliferative signaling, evading growth suppressors, resisting cell death, enabling replicative immortality, inducing angiogenesis, and activating invasion and metastasis. Underlying these hallmarks are genome instability, which generates the genetic diversity that expedites their acquisition, and inflammation, which fosters multiple hallmark functions. Conceptual progress in the last decade has added two emerging hallmarks of potential generality to this list-reprogramming of energy metabolism and evading immune destruction. In addition to cancer cells, tumors exhibit another dimension of complexity: they contain a repertoire of recruited, ostensibly normal cells that contribute to the acquisition of hallmark traits by creating the "tumor microenvironment." Recognition of the widespread applicability of these concepts will increasingly affect the development of new means to treat human cancer. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade

            The release of negative regulators of immune activation (immune checkpoints) that limit antitumor responses has resulted in unprecedented rates of long-lasting tumor responses in patients with a variety of cancers. This can be achieved by antibodies blocking the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway, either alone or in combination. The main premise for inducing an immune response is the pre-existence of antitumor T cells that were limited by specific immune checkpoints. Most patients who have tumor responses maintain long lasting disease control, yet one third of patients relapse. Mechanisms of acquired resistance are currently poorly understood, but evidence points to alterations that converge on the antigen presentation and interferon gamma signaling pathways. New generation combinatorial therapies may overcome resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice

              The T lymphocyte, especially its capacity for antigen-directed cytotoxicity, has become a central focus for engaging the immune system in the fight against cancer. Basic science discoveries elucidating the molecular and cellular biology of the T cell have led to new strategies in this fight, including checkpoint blockade, adoptive cellular therapy and cancer vaccinology. This area of immunological research has been highly active for the past 50 years and is now enjoying unprecedented bench-to-bedside clinical success. Here, we provide a comprehensive historical and biological perspective regarding the advent and clinical implementation of cancer immunotherapeutics, with an emphasis on the fundamental importance of T lymphocyte regulation. We highlight clinical trials that demonstrate therapeutic efficacy and toxicities associated with each class of drug. Finally, we summarize emerging therapies and emphasize the yet to be elucidated questions and future promise within the field of cancer immunotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anshika.goenka@northwestern.edu
                prakashg@knu.ac.kr
                abc2000@knu.ac.kr
                Journal
                Cancer Commun (Lond)
                Cancer Commun (Lond)
                10.1002/(ISSN)2523-3548
                CAC2
                Cancer Communications
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2523-3548
                02 April 2023
                May 2023
                : 43
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/cac2.v43.5 )
                : 525-561
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] The Ken & Ruth Davee Department of Neurology The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, 60611 IL USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Neurological Surgery Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago, 60611 IL USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Ophthalmology Schepens Eye Research Institute Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Harvard Medical School Boston, 02114 MA USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Neurology MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Charlestown, 02129 MA USA
                [ 5 ] Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California San Francisco San Francisco, 94143 CA USA
                [ 6 ] BK21 FOUR KNU Convergence Educational Program of Biomedical Sciences for Creative Future Talents Department of Biomedical Science, School of Medicine Kyungpook National University Daegu, 41944 South Korea
                [ 7 ] Department of Nuclear Medicine School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital Daegu, 41944 South Korea
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Anshika Goenka, The Ken & Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago 60611, IL, The United States of America.

                Email: anshika.goenka@ 123456northwestern.edu

                Prakash Gangadaran and Byeong‐Cheol Ahn, BK21 FOUR KNU Convergence Educational Program of Biomedical Sciences for Creative Future Talents, Department of Biomedical Science, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea.

                Email: prakashg@ 123456knu.ac.kr ; abc2000@ 123456knu.ac.kr

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-0339
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-3929
                Article
                CAC212416
                10.1002/cac2.12416
                10174093
                37005490
                1f1953e2-2b45-4837-b783-eb696a51b571
                © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. on behalf of Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 22 February 2023
                : 24 October 2022
                : 20 March 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Pages: 37, Words: 25735
                Funding
                Funded by: National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT)
                Award ID: NRF‐2022R1A2C2005057
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.8 mode:remove_FC converted:11.05.2023

                3d‐model,cancer therapy,gut microbiota,immune signaling,metabolism,signaling,tumor microenvironment

                Comments

                Comment on this article