There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Objective
To illustrate the radiological features of noncalcified DCIS (NC-DCIS) on mammography,
ultrasound and MRI. To highlight the role of MRI in determining extent of disease.
Introduction
DCIS accounts for 20% screen-detected cancers and 5% of symptomatic cancers. Eighty
to 90% present mammographically as microcalcifications, but 10 to 20% are noncalcified
and can be mammographically occult. With reported re-excision rates as high as 65%
for breast-conserving surgery in DCIS, accurately determining disease extent on preoperative
imaging is important.
Methods
Imaging of 117 patients with pure DCIS from 2007 to 2011 was reviewed retrospectively.
Fifteen patients with NC-DCIS were identified. Imaging findings were compared with
disease extent on postoperative histology.
Results
NC-DCIS appeared as follows. Mammography: occult 33%, diffuse increased breast density
33%, focal architectural distortion 13%, well-circumscribed lesion 13%, tubular ductal
density 7%. Ultrasound: occult 7%, intraductal lesion 13%, microcystic lesion 13%,
solid lesion 53%, ill-defined echo poor focus 13%. MRI: nonmass-like nodular enhancement
in a ductal, segmental or regional distribution 83%, amorphous nonmass-like enhancement
17%. MRI best depicted the true extent of disease.
Conclusion
Recognition of these imaging features is important for accurate surgical planning.
MRI has an important role in accurately delineating disease extent and should be considered
in treatment planning for NC-DCIS.
The purpose of this article is to describe and illustrate the variety of common morphologic features, enhancement patterns, and kinetics of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast, using the American College of Radiology BI-RADS lexicon. Breast MRI plays an important role in the detection of DCIS, which most often appears as nonmass clumped enhancement, in a ductal or segmental distribution, with variable enhancement kinetics.
To present the sonographic findings of mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with histopathologic correlation. The mammographic and ultrasonographic presentations of 47 radiographically non-calcified DCIS lesions in 35 patients were retrospectively analysed. Histological characteristics (architectural appearance, nuclear grade, percent of involved lobules, and presence of necrosis) were reviewed. Seventeen lesions were not mammographically visible (17/47, 36%). Ultrasonographically, these lesions showed an irregular shape (28/47, 60%), microlobulated margins (34/47, 72%) and abrupt interfaces (42/47, 90%). Only 11% (5/47) displayed posterior shadowing. The echotexture of these lesions was most frequently complex (29/47, 62%); therefore, they were divided into two types: type I (24 cases), which were predominantly solid with cystic components, and type II (five cases), which were predominantly cystic with a solid intra-cystic component. A trend to have greater than 50% DCIS cells in cancerous lobules was observed in masses displaying type I echotexture (difference=36%, 95% confidence interval 10.6-62.5) and microlobulated margins (difference=32%, 95% confidence interval 5.1-58.7). Ultrasonographically detected radiographically non-calcified DCIS commonly displays an irregular shape, microlobulated margins, and complex echotexture, giving a "pseudomicrocystic" appearance. Microlobulated margins and "pseudomicrocystic" echotexture seem to be associated with a cancerization of the lobules.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
Conference name:
British Society of Breast Radiology Annual Scientific Meeting 2012
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.