Microblog language identification: overcoming the limitations of short, unedited and idiomatic text

Weerkamp, Wouter; Carter, Simon; Tsagkias, Manos

doi:10.1007/s10579-012-9195-y

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Microblog language identification: overcoming the limitations of short, unedited and idiomatic text

Author(s): Simon Carter , Wouter Weerkamp , Manos Tsagkias

Publication date (Print): June 2012

Journal: Language Resources and Evaluation

Publisher: Springer Nature

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Most cited references 9

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Book Chapter: not found

Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning

Thomas G Dietterich (2000)

0 comments Cited 656 times – based on 0 reviews

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Conference Proceedings: not found

Earthquake shakes Twitter users

Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, Yutaka Matsuo (2010)

0 comments Cited 306 times – based on 0 reviews

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Conference Proceedings: not found

Microblogging during two natural hazards events

Leysia Palen, Kate Starbird, Amanda L. Hughes … (2010)

0 comments Cited 114 times – based on 0 reviews

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Title: Language Resources and Evaluation

Abbreviated Title: Lang Resources & Evaluation

Publisher: Springer Nature

ISSN (Print): 1574-020X

ISSN (Electronic): 1574-0218

Publication date Created: March 2013

Publication date (Print): June 2012

Volume: 47

Issue: 1

Pages: 195-215

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10579-012-9195-y

SO-VID: 1eddfc51-4070-46ba-883e-955724b36de3

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.