4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Species Profiles and Antimicrobial Resistance of Non- aureus Staphylococci Isolated from Healthy Broilers, Farm Environments, and Farm Workers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Non- aureus staphylococci (NAS), particularly antimicrobial-resistant NAS, have a substantial impact on human and animal health. In the current study, we investigated (1) the species profiles of NAS isolates collected from healthy broilers, farm environments, and farm workers in Korea, (2) the occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant NAS isolates, especially methicillin resistance, and (3) the genetic factors involved in the methicillin and fluoroquinolone resistance. In total, 216 NAS isolates of 16 different species were collected from healthy broilers (n=178), broiler farm environments (n=18), and farm workers (n=20) of 20 different broiler farms. The two most dominant broiler-associated NAS species were Staphylococcus agnetis (23.6%) and Staphylococcus xylosus (22.9%). Six NAS isolates were mecA-positive carrying staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCC mec) II (n=1), SCC mec IV (n=1), SCC mec V (n=2), or non-typeable SCC mec element (n=2). While two mecA-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from farm workers had SCC mec II and IV, a mecA-positive S. epidermidis isolate from broiler and a Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolate farm environment carried SCC mec V. The occurrence of multidrug resistance was observed in 48.1% (104/216 isolates) of NAS isolates with high resistance rates to β-lactams (>40%) and fusidic acid (59.7%). Fluoroquinolone resistance was confirmed in 59 NAS isolates (27.3%), and diverse mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE were identified. These findings suggest that NAS in broiler farms may have a potential role in the acquisition, amplification, and transmission of antimicrobial resistance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The sociobiology of biofilms.

          Biofilms are densely packed communities of microbial cells that grow on surfaces and surround themselves with secreted polymers. Many bacterial species form biofilms, and their study has revealed them to be complex and diverse. The structural and physiological complexity of biofilms has led to the idea that they are coordinated and cooperative groups, analogous to multicellular organisms. We evaluate this idea by addressing the findings of microbiologists from the perspective of sociobiology, including theories of collective behavior (self-organization) and social evolution. This yields two main conclusions. First, the appearance of organization in biofilms can emerge without active coordination. That is, biofilm properties such as phenotypic differentiation, species stratification and channel formation do not necessarily require that cells communicate with one another using specialized signaling molecules. Second, while local cooperation among bacteria may often occur, the evolution of cooperation among all cells is unlikely for most biofilms. Strong conflict can arise among multiple species and strains in a biofilm, and spontaneous mutation can generate conflict even within biofilms initiated by genetically identical cells. Biofilms will typically result from a balance between competition and cooperation, and we argue that understanding this balance is central to building a complete and predictive model of biofilm formation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Staphylococcal Biofilm Development: Structure, Regulation, and Treatment Strategies

            In many natural and clinical settings, bacteria are associated with some type of biotic or abiotic surface that enables them to form biofilms, a multicellular lifestyle with bacteria embedded in an extracellular matrix. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis , the most frequent causes of biofilm-associated infections on indwelling medical devices, can switch between an existence as single free-floating cells and multicellular biofilms. During biofilm formation, cells first attach to a surface and then multiply to form microcolonies. They subsequently produce the extracellular matrix, a hallmark of biofilm formation, which consists of polysaccharides, proteins, and extracellular DNA. After biofilm maturation into three-dimensional structures, the biofilm community undergoes a disassembly process that leads to the dissemination of staphylococcal cells. As biofilms are dynamic and complex biological systems, staphylococci have evolved a vast network of regulatory mechanisms to modify and fine-tune biofilm development upon changes in environmental conditions. Thus, biofilm formation is used as a strategy for survival and persistence in the human host and can serve as a reservoir for spreading to new infection sites. Moreover, staphylococcal biofilms provide enhanced resilience toward antibiotics and the immune response and impose remarkable therapeutic challenges in clinics worldwide. This review provides an overview and an updated perspective on staphylococcal biofilms, describing the characteristic features of biofilm formation, the structural and functional properties of the biofilm matrix, and the most important mechanisms involved in the regulation of staphylococcal biofilm formation. Finally, we highlight promising strategies and technologies, including multitargeted or combinational therapies, to eradicate staphylococcal biofilms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Presence and dissemination of the multiresistance gene cfr in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

              The emergence of the multiresistance gene cfr in staphylococci is of global concern. In addition to conferring resistance to phenicols, lincosamides, pleuromutilins, streptogramin A antibiotics and selected 16-membered macrolides, the cfr gene also confers resistance to the oxazolidinone linezolid. Linezolid is a last-resort antimicrobial agent for the treatment of serious infections in humans caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria. The cfr gene is often located on plasmids and several cfr-carrying plasmids have been described, which differ in their structure, their size and the presence of additional resistance genes. These plasmids are important vehicles that promote the spread of the cfr gene not only among bacteria of the same species, but also among those of different species and genera. Moreover, the cfr gene has been identified in close proximity to different insertion sequences, which most probably also play an important role in its dissemination. This review summarizes current knowledge on the genetic environment of the multiresistance gene cfr with particular reference to mobile genetic elements and co-located resistance genes that may support its emergence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Food Sci Anim Resour
                Food Sci Anim Resour
                Food Sci Anim Resour
                Food Sci Anim Resour
                kosfa
                Food Science of Animal Resources
                Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
                2636-0772
                2636-0780
                September 2023
                01 September 2023
                : 43
                : 5
                : 792-804
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University , Seoul 08826, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University , Anseong 17546, Korea
                [3 ]Department of Biotechnology, Inje University , Gimhae 50834, Korea
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author: Soo-Jin Yang, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, Tel: +82-2-880-1185, Fax: +82-2-873-1213, E-mail: soojinjj@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5843-785X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-0065
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6069-5076
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-1104
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-0373
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-8190
                Article
                kosfa-43-5-792
                10.5851/kosfa.2023.e36
                10493561
                37701746
                1e9d4098-7800-40dd-a1e4-073d05cd98d0
                © Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources

                This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 May 2023
                : 04 July 2023
                : 10 July 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: CrossRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003669, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
                Award ID: 2017NER54060
                Award ID: 2021ER220100
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                2023-09-30

                non-aureus staphylococci,broiler,species profiles,antimicrobial resistance

                Comments

                Comment on this article