1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Association of CHADS-P2A2RC Risk Score With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Taking P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After 3 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Author's summary

          It is unclear whether ischemic risk guides the selection of antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, the CHADS-P2A2RC was developed as an ischemic risk prediction model. There was a stepwise increase in the rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events and all-cause death according to increased CHADS-P2A2RC in the study population. No significant interactions were observed between the strata of the CHADS-P2A2RC and the antiplatelet strategies for ischemic and bleeding outcomes; the benefits of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy were similar even in patients with high ischemic risk. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate the utility of ischemic risk stratification to guide antiplatelet therapy selection after PCI.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives

          Concerns remain that early aspirin cessation may be associated with potential harm in subsets at high risk of ischemic events. This study aimed to assess the effects of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. prolonged DAPT (12-month or longer) based on the ischemic risk stratification, the CHADS-P2A2RC, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

          Methods

          This was a sub-study of the SMART-CHOICE trial. The effect of the randomized antiplatelet strategies was assessed across 3 CHADS-P2A2RC risk score categories. The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

          Results

          Up to 3 years, the high CHADS-P2A2RC risk score group had the highest incidence of MACCE (105 [12.1%], adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.927; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.358–6.309; p=0.006) followed by moderate-risk (40 [1.4%], adjusted HR, 1.786; 95% CI, 0.868–3.674; p=0.115) and low-risk (9 [0.5%], reference). In secondary analyses, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduced the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding without increasing the risk of MACCE as compared with prolonged DAPT across the 3 CHADS-P2A2RC risk strata without significant interaction term (interaction p for MACCE=0.705 and interaction p for BARC types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding=0.055).

          Conclusions

          The CHADS-P2A2RC risk score is valuable in discriminating high-ischemic-risk patients. Even in such patients with a high risk of ischemic events, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a lower incidence of bleeding without increased risk of ischemic events compared with prolonged DAPT.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02079194

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

            2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

              The executive summary of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions coronary artery revascularization guideline provides the top 10 items readers should know about the guideline. In the full guideline, the recommendations replace the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery guideline and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines. This summary offers a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization, as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use. A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered. Recommendations from the earlier percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery guidelines have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians in caring for patients undergoing coronary revascularization. This summary includes recommendations, tables, and figures from the full guideline that relate to the top 10 take-home messages. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, supportive text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in the development of this guideline.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean Circ J
                Korean Circ J
                KCJ
                Korean Circulation Journal
                The Korean Society of Cardiology
                1738-5520
                1738-5555
                April 2024
                11 March 2024
                : 54
                : 4
                : 189-200
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
                [2 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                [3 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                [4 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
                [5 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Young Bin Song, MD, PhD. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Korea. youngbin.song@ 123456gmail.com
                Correspondence to Jin-Ok Jeong, MD, PhD. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, 282, Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea. jojeong@ 123456cnu.ac.kr

                *Pil Sang Song and Seok-Woo Seong contributed equally to this manuscript as the first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6427-3911
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8066-1823
                https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0173-1968
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-1700
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0117-4873
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9635-8362
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-9101
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0763-4754
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-1367
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-377X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4902-5634
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-308X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0563-7014
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-9804
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-8041
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-9152
                Article
                10.4070/kcj.2023.0268
                11040264
                1e8c0aae-55f9-4f8b-8462-146d67499398
                Copyright © 2024. The Korean Society of Cardiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 September 2023
                : 28 December 2023
                : 23 January 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Chungnam National University, CrossRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002462;
                Categories
                Original Research

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                coronary artery disease,angioplasty,dual anti-platelet therapy,prognosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article