2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of therapeutic ultrasound in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Therapeutic ultrasound (US) is a treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but its efficacy and safety are unclear. The objective of this study is to quantify the effect of US on pain relief and function recovery in KOA, and to analyze the US treatment duration and parameters on treatment outcome.

          Methods

          We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to April 7, 2023. RCTs that compared the efficacy of therapeutic US with the control in KOA were included in the study, and the methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

          Results

          Twenty-one RCTs (1315 patients) were included. US had a positive effect on visual analog scale (VAS) (SMD = −0.64, 95 % CI [-0.88, −0.40], I 2  = 71 %) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) total scale (SMD = −0.45, 95 % CI [-0.69, −0.20]; I 2  = 67 %). Pulsed US with an intensity ≤2.5 W/cm 2 reduced visual analog scale (VAS), and differed in sessions (24 sessions (SMD = −0.80, 95 % CI [-1.07, −0.53], I 2 = 0 %) vs 10 sessions (SMD = −0.71, 95 % CI [-1.09, −0.33], I 2 = 68 %)). For pulsed US, a duration of treatment of 4–8 weeks (SMD = −0.69, 95 % CI [-1.13, −0.25], I 2 = 73 %) appeared to be superior to ≤4 weeks (SMD = −0.77, 95 % CI [-1.04, −0.49], I 2 = 0 %) for reducing visual analog scale (VAS). No US treatment-related adverse events were reported.

          Conclusion

          Therapeutic US may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with KOA. The mode, intensity, frequency, and duration of US may affect the effectiveness of pain relief. Pulsed US with an intensity ≤2.5 W/cm 2, 24 sessions, and a treatment duration of ≤4 weeks appears to have better pain relief.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

          Within the context of a double blind randomized controlled parallel trial of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, we validated WOMAC, a new multidimensional, self-administered health status instrument for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The pain, stiffness and physical function subscales fulfil conventional criteria for face, content and construct validity, reliability, responsiveness and relative efficiency. WOMAC is a disease-specific purpose built high performance instrument for evaluative research in osteoarthritis clinical trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies

            Background Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of disability in the elderly, however, there are few studies to estimate the global prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of knee OA. Methods For this study, we searched PUBMED, EMBASE and SCOPUS from inception to April 4, 2020, without language restriction. We identified eligible studies with information on the prevalence or incidence of knee OA in population-based observational studies and extracted data from published reports. We did random-effects meta-analysis to generate estimates. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181035). Findings Out of 9570 records identified, 88 studies with 10,081,952 participants were eligible for this study. The pooled global prevalence of knee OA was 16⋅0% (95% CI, 14⋅3%-17⋅8%) in individuals aged 15 and over and was 22⋅9% (95% CI, 19⋅8%-26⋅1%) in individuals aged 40 and over. Correspondingly, there are around 654⋅1 (95% CI, 565⋅6–745⋅6) million individuals (40 years and older) with knee OA in 2020 worldwide. The pooled global incidence of knee OA was 203 per 10,000 person-years (95% CI, 106–331) in individuals aged 20 and over. Correspondingly, there are around annual 86⋅7 (95% CI, 45⋅3–141⋅3) million individuals (20 years and older) with incident knee OA in 2020 worldwide. The prevalence and incidence varied substantially between individual countries and increased with age. The ratios of prevalence and incidence in females and males were 1⋅69 (95% CI, 1⋅59–1⋅80, p<0⋅00) and 1⋅39 (95% CI, 1⋅24–1⋅56, p<0⋅00), respectively. Interpretation Our study provides the global prevalence (16⋅0% [95% CI, 14⋅3%-17⋅8%]) and incidence (203 per 10,000 person-years [95% CI, 106–331]) of knee OA. These findings can be used to better assess the global health burden of knee OA. Further prospective cohort studies are warranted to identify modifiable risk factors for providing effectively preventive strategies in the early stages of the disease. Funding This work was supported by grants from the 10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81772384 and 81572174).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              MEASUREMENT OF PAIN

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                08 May 2024
                30 May 2024
                08 May 2024
                : 10
                : 10
                : e30874
                Affiliations
                [a ]Clinical Medicine Eight-Year Program, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
                [b ]CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                [c ]Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran
                [d ]Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
                [e ]National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, WenZhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
                [f ]Department of Precision Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
                [g ]African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya
                [h ]National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
                [i ]Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
                [j ]Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Dr. Antoni Pujadas, 42, Sant Boi de Llobregat, 08830, Barcelona, Spain
                [k ]Centre for Health, Performance, and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
                [l ]Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [m ]Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. Masoud.rahmati.mas@ 123456univ-amu.fr
                [** ]Corresponding author. Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, 23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea. yonkkang@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2405-8440(24)06905-6 e30874
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30874
                11128881
                38803857
                1e0cafa8-27bc-49d9-ae9a-6a285b83d897
                © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 8 January 2024
                : 2 April 2024
                : 7 May 2024
                Categories
                Research Article

                ultrasonic therapy,knee osteoarthritis,systematic review,meta-analysis,physical therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article