2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Artificial intelligence and the orthopaedic surgeon: A review of the literature and potential applications for future practice: Current concepts

      , , , , , ,
      Journal of ISAKOS
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data

          To allow fast and high-quality reconstruction of clinical accelerated multi-coil MR data by learning a variational network that combines the mathematical structure of variational models with deep learning.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Artificial Intelligence in Surgery

            The aim of this review was to summarize major topics in artificial intelligence (AI), including their applications and limitations in surgery. This paper reviews the key capabilities of AI to help surgeons understand and critically evaluate new AI applications and to contribute to new developments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment.

              To develop and validate a tool that screens for back pain prognostic indicators relevant to initial decision making in primary care. The setting was UK primary care adults with nonspecific back pain. Constructs that were independent prognostic indicators for persistence were identified from secondary analysis of 2 existing cohorts and published literature. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified single screening questions for relevant constructs. Psychometric properties of the tool, including concurrent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and repeatability, were assessed within a new development sample (n = 131) and tool score cutoffs were established to enable allocation to 3 subgroups (low, medium, and high risk). Predictive and external validity were evaluated within an independent external sample (n = 500). The tool included 9 items: referred leg pain, comorbid pain, disability (2 items), bothersomeness, catastrophizing, fear, anxiety, and depression. The latter 5 items were identified as a psychosocial subscale. The tool demonstrated good reliability and validity and was acceptable to patients and clinicians. Patients scoring 0-3 were classified as low risk, and those scoring 4 or 5 on a psychosocial subscale were classified as high risk. The remainder were classified as medium risk. We validated a brief screening tool, which is a promising instrument for identifying subgroups of patients to guide the provision of early secondary prevention in primary care. Further work will establish whether allocation to treatment subgroups using the tool, linked with targeting treatment appropriately, improves patient outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of ISAKOS
                Journal of ISAKOS
                Elsevier BV
                20597754
                April 2024
                April 2024
                : 9
                : 2
                : 227-233
                Article
                10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.015
                1e0aa0a6-0f7a-4836-832c-2f24c9e13fcd
                © 2024

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article