9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Glossary of terms used in ecotoxicology (IUPAC Recommendations 2009)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The objective of the "Glossary of Terms Used in Ecotoxicology" is to give clear definitions for those who contribute to studies relevant to ecotoxicology but are not themselves ecotoxicologists. This applies especially to chemists who need to understand the ecotoxicological literature without recourse to a multiplicity of dictionaries. The Glossary includes terms related to chemical speciation in the environment, sampling, monitoring and environmental analysis, as well as to adverse ecological effects of chemicals, ecological biomarkers, and the environmental distribution of chemicals. The dictionary consists of about 1139 terms. The authors hope that among the groups who will find this glossary helpful, in addition to chemists, are pharmacologists, toxicologists, ecotoxicologists, risk assessors, regulators, medical practitioners, and regulatory authorities. In particular, the glossary should facilitate the use of chemistry in relation to environmental risk assessment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The operated Markov´s chains in economy (discrete chains of Markov with the income)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Studies for Students: The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Practical causal inference for ecoepidemiologists.

              G Fox (1991)
              Environmental scientists and managers must determine whether a relationship between an environmental factor and an observed effect is causal and respond accordingly. Epidemiologists have, over the past 150 yr, developed a systematic approach to evaluating these relationships. Their criteria for objectively evaluating the relationship between a suspect cause and a chronic disease are (1) probability, (2) time order, (3) strength of association, (4) specificity, (5) consistency on replication, (6) predictive performance, and (7) coherence. These criteria can be used, with little modification, to evaluate associations in relation to diseases in fish and wildlife suspected to be caused by exposure to chemical pollutants. Some populations of fish and wildlife are members of the same guilds as subpopulations of humans. Investigations of chemically induced disease in these sentinel populations of fish and wildlife may identify the potential risks posed to these human subpopulations. Evidence evaluated using the epidemiologic criteria may assist environmental managers to determine whether a substantive case can be made to initiate preventative or remedial action. By applying the null hypothesis, scientists are forced to consider how much information must be ignored to conclude that a causal relationship does not exist.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pure and Applied Chemistry
                International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)
                1365-3075
                0033-4545
                April 20 2009
                April 20 2009
                : 81
                : 5
                : 829-970
                Affiliations
                [1 ]1Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology , University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [3 ]3Rockilde University Centre, Roskilde, Denmark
                [4 ]4The Edinburgh Centre for Toxicology, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
                Article
                10.1351/PAC-REC-08-07-09
                1df2c278-40f0-4248-87e8-c89fd9a10d76
                © 2009
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article