Introduction
Mucin-producing urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate (MPUAP) is an exceedingly
rare neoplasm. To date, only 23 cases have been reported in the English literature.
1
MPUAP shows normal serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as it arises through
a process of glandular metaplasia of the prostatic urethra and subsequent in situ
adenocarcinoma.
1
Gleason score, the grading system used to determine the aggressiveness of prostate
cancer, should not be applied to MPUAP, as this neoplasm is not a usual acinar adenocarcinoma
of the prostate.
2
Immunohistochemically, MPUAP is reportedly negative for PSA and caudal-related homeobox
2 (CDX2) and, in most cases, positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7), CK20, high-molecular-weight
cytokeratin (clone 34βE12), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).
1
,
2
We report an autopsy-proven case of occult MPUAP presenting with lymph node and extensive
bone metastases.
Case presentation
An 81-year-old man was referred to our hospital for suspected hematological malignancy
or occult cancer after management and investigation of a high fever and low back pain
of unknown cause for 1 month in a previous hospital. His medical history was significant
for hypertension. There were no urinary symptoms including urinary obstruction. The
physical examination and urinalysis were unremarkable. Blood levels of white blood
cells (13,590/μL), lactate dehydrogenase (663 IU/L), and soluble interleukin-2 receptor
(2330 U/mL) were increased, whereas the hemoglobin (9.5 g/dL) level was decreased.
The serum CEA and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels were significantly increased
to 9849 ng/mL (normal, 0.7–4.2 ng/mL) and 1999 U/mL (normal, <37 U/mL), respectively,
whereas the serum PSA level of 0.55 ng/mL was within normal limits (normal, <4.0 ng/mL).
Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy did not reveal any lesions. Whole-body
computed tomography showed no evidence of malignancy. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose
positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) demonstrated abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in
multiple bones, including sternum, ribs, vertebrae, pelvis, humeri, and femora; mediastinal
lymph nodes; and prostate (Fig. 1a–c). Bone marrow biopsy from the pelvic bone revealed
poorly to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Fig. 2a). There was only a small
amount of extracellular mucin. On immunohistochemical examination, adenocarcinoma
cells were positive for CK20, 34βE12, CEA, and CA19-9 (Fig. 2b–e, respectively), and
negative for CDX2, CK7, and PSA (Fig. 2f).
Fig. 1
Findings of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET)
(a) Abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in multiple bones, including ribs, vertebrae, pelvis,
humeri, and femora was observed. (b) High 18F-FDG uptake in the mediastinal lymph
nodes (arrows) was seen. (c) There was an abnormal focus of 18F-FDG uptake (arrow)
in the prostate gland.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Histological and immunohistochemical images of the bone marrow biopsy
(a) Adenocarcinoma cells were seen. Hematoxylin and eosin staining. (b–f) Adenocarcinoma
cells were positive for cytokeratin 20 (b), high-molecular-weight cytokeratin (34βE12)
(c), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (d), and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 (e), and
negative for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (f). (b–f) Immunohistochemistry with
hematoxylin counterstaining.
Fig. 2
According to the 18F-FDG-PET findings, normal serum PSA levels, and immunohistochemical
panel, although extremely rare, occult MPUAP was suspected. The elderly patient with
advanced-stage occult cancer denied chemotherapy and was transferred to the palliative
care unit for pain management. Two weeks later, he died of respiratory failure with
severe pancytopenia.
Autopsy revealed macroscopically a grayish-white mucinous mass, 25 × 15 mm in size,
in a cross-section of the left transition and peripheral zone of the prostate (Fig.
3a). Microscopically, adenocarcinoma cells formed nests floating in extracellular
mucus lakes (Fig. 3b). The tumor cells showed relatively strong nuclear atypia with
cytoplasmic mucin. The mucus lakes were surrounded by fibrous stroma with scattered
adenocarcinoma cell nests. We also observed extracapsular extension as well as prominent
seminal vesicle, perineural, lymphatic vessel, and vascular invasion. The prostatic
urethral urothelium showed glandular metaplasia (Fig. 3c) and a transition between
adenomatous epithelium and adenocarcinoma (Fig. 3d). Accordingly, the tumor was diagnosed
as MPUAP. The immunohistochemical findings of adenocarcinoma cells in the prostate
were identical to those of the biopsy specimen. There were multiple bone and mediastinal
lymph node metastases, consistent with the 18F-FDG-PET findings. Extracellular mucus
lakes were occasionally seen in those metastatic lesions.
Fig. 3
Macroscopic and histological images of the prostate (a) Cross-section of the prostate
at the level of the verumontanum showed a grayish-white mucinous mass (arrows) in
the left transition and peripheral zone (scale bar: 3 cm). (b) Adenocarcinoma cell
nests floated in mucus lakes. (c) The prostatic urethral urothelium showed glandular
metaplasia. (d) Transition between adenomatous epithelium and adenocarcinoma (arrows)
was seen in the prostatic urethra. (b–d) Hematoxylin and eosin staining.
Fig. 3
Discussion
Although the Gleason score should not be applied to MPUAP, it has been reported to
be aggressive.
2
MPUAP is histologically identical to nonurachal adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder
and differ from mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
2
Thus, hormone therapy would be inappropriate. Among 23 previously reported cases,
metastatic disease developed in the lung in four cases, liver in three cases, pelvic
wall in two cases, testis in one case; bone metastases were seen in only one case.
1
Ten patients died of disease at an average of 44.3 months from presentation,
1
,
2
suggesting progression to death is more common in MPUAP than in usual adenocarcinoma
of the prostate. The difference in prognosis between MPUAP and usual adenocarcinoma
of the prostate emphasizes the importance of differentiating between them.
Our case is the first reported to show significantly increased serum levels of CEA
and CA 19-9 in MPUAP. To date, the clinical value of CEA and CA19-9 as tumor markers
for MPUAP has been unknown. In some cases, elevated serum levels of CEA and CA19-9
have been demonstrated in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper urinary
tract.
3
Hegele et al. reported that, in urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder, serum
CEA and CA19-9 levels correlated with tumor invasion and malignancy grade.
4
Thus, serum levels of CEA and CA19–9 may be associated with prognosis of MPUAP, as
it is thought to originate from the prostatic urethral urothelium. In fact, our case
showed extensive bone metastases, which were rare in previously reported cases, and
died only 2 months from presentation, far shorter than the average duration in previous
cases. This suggests that serum CEA and CA19-9 levels can be an important prognostic
factor in MPUAP.
18F-FDG-PET can be valuable for detecting MPUAP. It has often been stated that 18F-FDG-PET
is not useful in prostate cancer. However, a recent study reported that aggressive
primary prostate tumors with a Gleason score greater than 7 tended to show high FDG
uptake.
5
As mentioned, MPUAP has been reported to be aggressive. In fact, high 18F-FDG uptake
in the prostate shown using 18F-FDG-PET allowed us to consider occult MPUAP in the
differential diagnosis. Therefore, 18F-FDG-PET may be quite useful in localizing the
site of MPUAP.
Conclusion
MPUAP, originating from the prostatic urethral urothelium, is thought to be aggressive
compared with usual adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Our case is the first to show
significantly elevated serum levels of CEA and CA 19-9 and presented with prominent
seminal vesicle, perineural, lymphatic vessel, and vascular invasion, extensive bone
metastases, and far shorter duration of survival than average in previous cases. This
suggests serum CEA and CA19-9 levels can be an important prognostic factor in MPUAP.
Consent
Informed consent was obtained from his family for the publication of this report.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,
commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.