10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ChatGPT and its variants that use generative artificial intelligence (AI) models have rapidly become a focal point in academic and media discussions about their potential benefits and drawbacks across various sectors of the economy, democracy, society, and environment. It remains unclear whether these technologies result in job displacement or creation, or if they merely shift human labour by generating new, potentially trivial or practically irrelevant, information and decisions. According to the CEO of ChatGPT, the potential impact of this new family of AI technology could be as big as “the printing press”, with significant implications for employment, stakeholder relationships, business models, and academic research, and its full consequences are largely undiscovered and uncertain. The introduction of more advanced and potent generative AI tools in the AI market, following the launch of ChatGPT, has ramped up the “AI arms race”, creating continuing uncertainty for workers, expanding their business applications, while heightening risks related to well‐being, bias, misinformation, context insensitivity, privacy issues, ethical dilemmas, and security. Given these developments, this perspectives editorial offers a collection of perspectives and research pathways to extend HRM scholarship in the realm of generative AI. In doing so, the discussion synthesizes the literature on AI and generative AI, connecting it to various aspects of HRM processes, practices, relationships, and outcomes, thereby contributing to shaping the future of HRM research.

          Key points

          What is currently known?

          • The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence models has swiftly prompted much academic and media discourse regarding their potential for disruption as well as their transformative power impacting multiple facets of the economy, society, and environment.

          • Software tools like ChatGPT and other comparable ones utilizing generative AI models can produce incredibly human‐like responses to queries, yet, they can also be profoundly erroneous, raising significant ethical and moral issues, and their adoption by HRM practitioners.

          What this perspectives editorial adds?

          • Provides a comprehensive summary of the advancements, constraints, and commercial applications of generative AI.

          • Offers 11 perspectives that advance scholarship in HRM and present a collection of unexplored research opportunities for HRM scholars.

          The implications for practitioners

          • Comprehending the possible strengths and weaknesses of implementing immersive technologies like ChatGPT and its variants in HRM strategy, practices, procedures, platforms, and productivity will aid organisations' leaders in critically evaluating its relevance, feasibility to implement, usefulness and potential impact to achieve organisationally valued outcomes.

          • The lack of regulations heightens the risks and ethical dilemmas associated with the usage of generative AI models, which presents significant threats for organisations, scholarly research, and society at large.

          Related collections

          Most cited references133

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

            Jay Barney (1991)
            Understanding sources of sustained competitive advantage has become a major area of research in strategic management. Building on the assumptions that strategic resources are heterogeneously distributed acrossfirms and that these differences are stable over time, this article examines the link betweenfirm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Four empirical indicators of the potential of firm resources to generate sustained competitive advantage-value, rareness, imitability, and substitutability-are discussed. The model is applied by analyzing the potential of severalfirm resourcesfor generating sustained competitive advantages. The article concludes by examining implications of this firm resource model of sustained competitive advantage for other business disciplines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Human Resource Management Journal
                Human Res Mgmt Journal
                Wiley
                0954-5395
                1748-8583
                July 2023
                July 10 2023
                July 2023
                : 33
                : 3
                : 606-659
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Aston University Birmingham UK
                [2 ] Information, Operations and Management Sciences Department TBS Business School Toulouse France
                [3 ] DAN Department of Management & Organizational Studies Western University London Ontario Canada
                [4 ] Cranfield University Bedford UK
                [5 ] University of Bath Claver Down UK
                [6 ] Trinity Business School Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
                [7 ] School of Business The George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
                [8 ] Monash Data Futures Institute Monash University Melbourne Australia
                [9 ] Department of Human Resources & Organizational Behavior School of Business Rutgers University‐Camden Camden New Jersey USA
                [10 ] Human Resource Studies Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands
                [11 ] Utrecht University School of Governance Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
                [12 ] Monash Business School Monash University Melbourne Australia
                [13 ] Department of Strategy & International Business Birmingham Business School University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [14 ] Tulane University A.B. Freeman School of Business New Orleans Los Angeles USA
                [15 ] Operations and Information Management Department Aston Business School College of Business and Social Science Aston University Birmingham UK
                [16 ] King's Business School King's College London London UK
                [17 ] Department of Organizational Science University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte North Carolina USA
                [18 ] College of Human and Social Futures Newcastle Business School The University of Newcastle (UON) Ourimbah NSW Australia
                [19 ] Newcastle University Business School Newcastle Upon Tyne UK
                [20 ] Henley Business School University of Reading Reading UK
                [21 ] NEOMA Business School Reims France
                [22 ] Queen's Business School Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK
                [23 ] Department of Management Birmingham Business School University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [24 ] Simon Fraser University Burnaby British Columbia Canada
                [25 ] Quinlan School of Business Loyola University Chicago Illinois USA
                Article
                10.1111/1748-8583.12524
                1d3cfc68-047b-477b-91e4-b4b33a093670
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article