There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Sir,
This clinical report describes the prosthetic rehabilitation of an edentulous patient,who
was dissatisfied from her 8-year-old denture. To give her a better fit, we opted Biofunctional
Prosthetic System (BPS) for the new prosthesis. BPS is the system designed to work
with the body in a biologically harmonious way, maximizing function, and giving comfort
and natural appearance to the patient. The functional impression technique and simulation
of the jaw movements by the Stratos 200 articulator in BPS ensure that BPS denture
meets most exacting requirements.[1]
BPS denture meets the esthetic demand of patients with its unique Ivoclear teeth,
which replicate anatomy of the natural tooth Ivoclear teeth are made up of 3 layers
of cross-linked acrylic resins that contribute to a life-like appearance and resistance
to wearing. BPS system uses a controlled heat/pressure polymerization procedure during
which time the exact amount of material flows into the flask to compensate for shrinkage,
which ensures a perfect fit. This pressure also optimizes the physical properties
of the denture.
[2]
A 60-year-old edentulous woman with a chief complaint of compromised function and
esthetics was treated in the clinic. Intraoral examination showed resorbed ridges
and masticatory dysfunction [Figure 1]. An extraoral examination revealed flattened
mandibular plane. She was wearing dentures with attrited teeth and worn out denture
base. A significant loss of vertical dimension affected the temporomandibular joint.
Hence, a BPS denture was planned to give her a better fitted prosthesis.
Figure 1
Resorbed ridges
The BPS recommends impression making similar in principle to the mucostatic method
that minimally compresses tissues, using a combination of irreversible hydrocolloids
of varying densities together in the same impression.[3] Low-density impression material
(syringe Acc Gel) was syringed into the vestibular area and the occlusal centric tray
was loaded with high-density hydrocolloid and inserted into the patient’s mouth to
get the initial vertical dimension [Figure 2]. This vertical dimension was used for
mounting the casts obtained from initial impressions, taken with Accu-trays (different
from conventional denture trays) with an extra flange to cover the vestibular areas
and extended distal part to cover the retromandibular pad area more efficiently [Figure
3]. Custom trays were made on the primary casts. The Gnathometer M tracing device
was attached to the casts, which facilitates the clinical procedures of secondary
impression making, face-bow record and jaw registration [Figure 4].
Figure 2
Occlussal centric tray loaded with impression for recording initial vertical dimension
Figure 3
Biofunctional prosthetic system impression trays
Figure 4
Bite registration through Gnathometer M
The secondary impression was taken with zinc oxide eugenol impression paste [Figure
5]. Casts were poured and a wax-up denture was made for the trial [Figure 6]. After
checking the fit and occlussal relations, the denture was sent to the laboratory.
Dentures were cured with injection molding technique [Figure 7] using Ivocap high-impact
plus denture base material.[4] Necessary adjustments were done and the dentures were
delivered to the patient.
Figure 5
Secondary impression-making with zinc oxide eugenol paste
Figure 6
Wax-up trial for the patient
Figure 7
Acrylized denture
The patient was recalled after 6 months and examined. There was no occlusal disharmony
or sore spots. The patient was very much satisfied with her new prosthesis and she
showed her gratification for the comfortable prosthesis and a younger look.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.