17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Integration of Mobile Health Into Sickle Cell Disease Care to Increase Hydroxyurea Utilization: Protocol for an Efficacy and Implementation Study

      research-article
      , MD, MS 1 , , , MD 2 , , PhD, MPH 3 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 4 , , PhD 5 , , MD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 5 , , PhD 8 , , MS, APRN 9 , , MD 10 , , PhD 11 , , MD 12 , , PhD 12 , , PhD 13 , , PhD 12 , , PhD 2 , Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium 14
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Research Protocols
      JMIR Publications
      sickle cell anemia, digital medicine, adherence, hydroxycarbamide, RE-AIM, implementation science, health innovation, mobile phone

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Hydroxyurea prevents disease complications among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Although its efficacy has been endorsed by the National Health Lung and Blood Institute evidence-based guidelines, its adoption is low, both by patients with SCD and providers. Mobile health (mHealth) apps provide benefits in improving medication adherence and self-efficacy among patients with chronic diseases and have facilitated prescription among medical providers. However, mHealth has not been systematically tested as a tool to increase hydroxyurea adherence nor has the combination of mHealth been assessed at both patient and provider levels to increase hydroxyurea utilization.

          Objective

          This study aims to increase hydroxyurea utilization through a combined two-level mHealth intervention for both patients with SCD and their providers with the goals of increasing adherence to hydroxyurea among patients and improve hydroxyurea prescribing behavior among providers.

          Methods

          We will test the efficacy of 2 mHealth interventions to increase both patient and provider utilization and knowledge of hydroxyurea in 8 clinical sites of the NHLBI-funded Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC). The patient mHealth intervention, InCharge Health, includes multiple components that address memory, motivation, and knowledge barriers to hydroxyurea use. The provider mHealth intervention, Hydroxyurea Toolbox ( HU Toolbox), addresses the clinical knowledge barriers in prescribing and monitoring hydroxyurea. The primary hypothesis is that among adolescents and adults with SCD, adherence to hydroxyurea, as measured by the proportion of days covered (the ratio of the number of days the patient is covered by the medication to the number of days in the treatment period), will increase by at least 20% after 24 weeks of receiving the InCharge Health app, compared with their adherence at baseline. As secondary objectives, we will (1) examine the change in health-related quality of life, acute disease complications, perceived health literacy, and perceived self-efficacy in taking hydroxyurea among patients who use InCharge Health and (2) examine potential increases in the awareness of hydroxyurea benefits and risks, appropriate prescribing, and perceived self-efficacy to correctly administer hydroxyurea therapy among SCD providers between baseline and 9 months of using the HU Toolbox app. We will measure the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of both the InCharge Health and the HU Toolbox apps using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework and qualitatively evaluate the implementation of both mHealth interventions.

          Results

          The study is currently enrolling study participants. Recruitment is anticipated to be completed by mid-2021.

          Conclusions

          If this two-level intervention, that is, the combined use of InCharge Health and HU Toolbox apps, demonstrates efficacy in increasing adherence to hydroxyurea and prescribing behavior in patients with SCD and their providers, respectively, both apps will be offered to other institutions outside the SCDIC through a future large-scale implementation-effectiveness study.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04080167; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04080167

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          DERR1-10.2196/16319

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review

          The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand “how” and “why” results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples

            Evidence-informed health intervention planning that incorporates theoretical and empirical evidence and engages key stakeholders and community members or patients in the planning process results in interventions that are more effective. Nevertheless, exactly how and when to use evidence, theory, and community-based participation during planning represents a challenge. In this Perspective, we describe Intervention Mapping (IM), a framework for theory- and evidence-based health promotion program planning that addresses this challenge by providing a systematic and stepwise approach to planning interventions. IM has been used to develop health promotion interventions and implementation strategies in community and clinical settings globally, with over 1000 published articles employing the framework. In this Perspective, we also highlight recent and innovative applications of IM described in the articles of the Frontiers in Public Health Special Topic on IM. We conclude by discussing new directions in the application of IM including novel methods for identifying determinants of behavior and environmental conditions, the application of IM for planning implementation strategies, and IM for adaptation of evidence-based programs in new settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effect of prolonged administration of hydroxyurea on morbidity and mortality in adult patients with sickle cell syndromes: results of a 17-year, single-center trial (LaSHS).

              The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of hydroxyurea (HU) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Thirty-four patients with sickle cell anemia (hemoglobin S [HbS]/HbS), 131 with HbS/beta(0)-thal, and 165 with HbS/beta(+)-thal participated in this trial. HU was administered to 131 patients, whereas 199 patients were conventionally treated. The median follow-up period was 8 years for HU patients and 5 years for non-HU patients. HU produced a dramatic reduction in the frequency of severe painful crises, transfusion requirements, hospital admissions, and incidence of acute chest syndrome. The probability of 10-year survival was 86% and 65% for HU and non-HU patients, respectively (P = .001), although HU patients had more severe forms of SCD. The 10-year probability of survival for HbS/HbS, HbS/beta (0)-thal, and HbS/IVSI-110 patients was 100%, 87%, and 82%, respectively, for HU patients and 10%, 54%, and 66%, for non-HU patients. The multivariate analysis showed that fetal hemoglobin values at baseline and percentage change of lactate dehydrogenase between baseline and 6 months were independently predicted for survival in the HU group. These results highlight the beneficial effect of HU, which seems to modify the natural history of SCD and raise the issue of expanding its use in all SCD patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                On behalf of : Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC)
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                July 2020
                14 July 2020
                : 9
                : 7
                : e16319
                Affiliations
                [1 ] St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital Memphis, TN United States
                [2 ] Department of Medicine Duke University Durham, NC United States
                [3 ] Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park, NC United States
                [4 ] University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health Houston, TX United States
                [5 ] Center for Blood Disorders Medical College of Georgia Augusta University Augusta, GA United States
                [6 ] Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, IL United States
                [7 ] Division of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine University of Florida Gainsville, FL United States
                [8 ] Department of Public Health Sciences College of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC United States
                [9 ] Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY United States
                [10 ] Division of Hematology Oncology UC Davis School of Medicine Davis, CA United States
                [11 ] University of California San Francisco Benioff Children Hospital Oakland Oakland, CA United States
                [12 ] Division of Hematology Oncology Department of Pediatrics Washington University St. Louis, MO United States
                [13 ] University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco, CA United States
                [14 ] Bethesda, MA United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Jane S Hankins jane.hankins@ 123456stjude.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-7321
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7506-0935
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1616-7406
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7276-4689
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-7379
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1075-4303
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-7295
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-1138
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-8087
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-5631
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-7862
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6383-7172
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-1846
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-1532
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-0147
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9930-392X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6237-4743
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-9825
                Article
                v9i7e16319
                10.2196/16319
                7388044
                32442144
                1cf2ae72-a9db-4cd0-a8ee-7b54e5c5bd9e
                ©Jane S Hankins, Nirmish Shah, Lisa DiMartino, Donald Brambilla, Maria E Fernandez, Robert W Gibson, Victor R Gordeuk, Richard Lottenberg, Abdullah Kutlar, Cathy Melvin, Jena Simon, Ted Wun, Marsha Treadwell, Cecelia Calhoun, Ana Baumann, Michael B Potter, Lisa Klesges, Hayden Bosworth, Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 14.07.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 24 September 2019
                : 24 March 2020
                : 1 April 2020
                : 7 April 2020
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                sickle cell anemia,digital medicine,adherence,hydroxycarbamide,re-aim,implementation science,health innovation,mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article