105
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervous system

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Traditional theories of cognitive science have typically accounted for the organization of human behavior by detailing requisite computational/representational functions and identifying neurological mechanisms that might perform these functions. Put simply, such approaches hold that neural activity causes behavior. This same general framework has been extended to accounts of human social behavior via concepts such as “common-coding” and “co-representation” and much recent neurological research has been devoted to brain structures that might execute these social-cognitive functions. Although these neural processes are unquestionably involved in the organization and control of human social interactions, there is good reason to question whether they should be accorded explanatory primacy. Alternatively, we propose that a full appreciation of the role of neural processes in social interactions requires appropriately situating them in their context of embodied-embedded constraints. To this end, we introduce concepts from dynamical systems theory and review research demonstrating that the organization of human behavior, including social behavior, can be accounted for in terms of self-organizing processes and lawful dynamics of animal-environment systems. Ultimately, we hope that these alternative concepts can complement the recent advances in cognitive neuroscience and thereby provide opportunities to develop a complete and coherent account of human social interaction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references112

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Intelligence without representation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations.

            The parieto-frontal cortical circuit that is active during action observation is the circuit with mirror properties that has been most extensively studied. Yet, there remains controversy on its role in social cognition and its contribution to understanding the actions and intentions of other individuals. Recent studies in monkeys and humans have shed light on what the parieto-frontal cortical circuit encodes and its possible functional relevance for cognition. We conclude that, although there are several mechanisms through which one can understand the behaviour of other individuals, the parieto-frontal mechanism is the only one that allows an individual to understand the action of others 'from the inside' and gives the observer a first-person grasp of the motor goals and intentions of other individuals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system.

              Is it possible to understand the intentions of other people by simply observing their actions? Many believe that this ability is made possible by the brain's mirror neuron system through its direct link between action and observation. However, precisely how intentions can be inferred through action observation has provoked much debate. Here we suggest that the function of the mirror system can be understood within a predictive coding framework that appeals to the statistical approach known as empirical Bayes. Within this scheme the most likely cause of an observed action can be inferred by minimizing the prediction error at all levels of the cortical hierarchy that are engaged during action observation. This account identifies a precise role for the mirror system in our ability to infer intentions from actions and provides the outline of the underlying computational mechanisms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                07 June 2012
                2012
                : 6
                : 164
                Affiliations
                [1] 1simpleDepartment of Psychology, Perceptual-Motor Dynamics Laboratory, CAP Center for Cognition, Action, and Perception, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH, USA
                [2] 2simpleMovement to Health Laboratory, EuroMov, Montpellier-1 University Montpellier, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Chris Frith, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at University College London, UK

                Reviewed by: Harold Bekkering, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands; Scott Kelso, Florida Atlantic University, USA; Wolfgang Prinz, Max Planck Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany

                *Correspondence: Charles A. Coey, Department of Psychology, Perceptual-Motor Dynamics Laboratory, CAP Center for Cognition, Action and Perception, University of Cincinnati, ML 0376, 4150-B Edwards C1, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0376, USA. e-mail: coeyca@ 123456mail.uc.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2012.00164
                3369191
                22701413
                1c77b101-02a8-498a-89d1-069f799ad3ca
                Copyright © 2012 Coey, Varlet and Richardson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.

                History
                : 02 February 2012
                : 22 May 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 143, Pages: 12, Words: 11457
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review Article

                Neurosciences
                neuroscience,embodiment,joint action,rhythmic coordination,dynamics
                Neurosciences
                neuroscience, embodiment, joint action, rhythmic coordination, dynamics

                Comments

                Comment on this article