161
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of Toceranib/Piroxicam/Cyclophosphamide Maintenance Therapy on Outcome of Dogs with Appendicular Osteosarcoma following Amputation and Carboplatin Chemotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We hypothesized that the addition of toceranib to metronomic cyclophosphamide/piroxicam therapy would significantly improve disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma (OSA) following amputation and carboplatin chemotherapy.

          Methods and Findings

          This was a randomized, prospective clinical trial in which dogs with OSA free of gross metastatic disease (n = 126) received carboplatin chemotherapy (4 doses) following amputation. On study entry, dogs were randomized to receive piroxicam/cyclophosphamide with or without toceranib (n = 63 each) after completing chemotherapy. Patient demographics were not significantly different between both groups. During or immediately following carboplatin chemotherapy, 32 dogs (n = 13 toceranib; n = 19 control) developed metastatic disease, and 13 dogs left the study due to other medical conditions or owner preference. Following carboplatin chemotherapy, 81 dogs (n = 46 toceranib; n = 35 control) received the metronomic treatment; 35 dogs (n = 20 toceranib; n = 15 control) developed metastatic disease during the maintenance therapy, and 26 dogs left the study due to other medical conditions or owner preference. Nine toceranib-treated and 11 control dogs completed the study without evidence of metastatic disease 1-year following amputation. Toceranib-treated dogs experienced more episodes of diarrhea, neutropenia and weight loss than control dogs, although these toxicities were low-grade and typically resolved with supportive care. More toceranib-treated dogs (n = 8) were removed from the study for therapy-associated adverse events compared to control dogs (n = 1). The median DFI for control and toceranib treated dogs was 215 and 233 days, respectively (p = 0.274); the median OS for control and toceranib treated dogs was 242 and 318 days, respectively (p = 0.08). The one year survival rate for control dogs was 35% compared to 38% for dogs receiving toceranib.

          Conclusions

          The addition of toceranib to metronomic piroxicam/cyclophosphamide therapy following amputation and carboplatin chemotherapy did not improve median DFI, OS or the 1-year survival rate in dogs with OSA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis.

          Herein we report that the VEGFR/PDGFR kinase inhibitor sunitinib/SU11248 can accelerate metastatic tumor growth and decrease overall survival in mice receiving short-term therapy in various metastasis assays, including after intravenous injection of tumor cells or after removal of primary orthotopically grown tumors. Acceleration of metastasis was also observed in mice receiving sunitinib prior to intravenous implantation of tumor cells, suggesting possible "metastatic conditioning" in multiple organs. Similar findings with additional VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors implicate a class-specific effect for such agents. Importantly, these observations of metastatic acceleration were in contrast to the demonstrable antitumor benefits obtained when the same human breast cancer cells, as well as mouse or human melanoma cells, were grown orthotopically as primary tumors and subjected to identical sunitinib treatments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Metronomic cyclophosphamide regimen selectively depletes CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and restores T and NK effector functions in end stage cancer patients.

            CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are involved in the prevention of autoimmune diseases and in tumor-induced tolerance. We previously demonstrated in tumor-bearing rodents that one injection of cyclophosphamide could significantly decrease both numbers and suppressive functions of regulatory T cells, facilitating vaccine-induced tumor rejection. In humans, iterative low dosing of cyclophosphamide, referred to as "metronomic" therapy, has recently been used in patients with advanced chemotherapy resistant cancers with the aim of reducing tumor angiogenesis. Here we show that oral administration of metronomic cyclophosphamide in advanced cancer patients induces a profound and selective reduction of circulating regulatory T cells, associated with a suppression of their inhibitory functions on conventional T cells and NK cells leading to a restoration of peripheral T cell proliferation and innate killing activities. Therefore, metronomic regimen of cyclophosphamide does not only affect tumor angiogenesis but also strongly curtails immunosuppressive regulatory T cells, favoring a better control of tumor progression. Altogether these data support cyclophosphamide regimen as a valuable treatment for reducing tumor-induced immune tolerance before setting to work anticancer immunotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Antiangiogenic scheduling of chemotherapy improves efficacy against experimental drug-resistant cancer.

              To reveal the antiangiogenic capability of cancer chemotherapy, we developed an alternative antiangiogenic schedule for administration of cyclophosphamide. We show here that this antiangiogenic schedule avoided drug resistance and eradicated Lewis lung carcinoma and L1210 leukemia, an outcome not possible with the conventional schedule. When Lewis lung carcinoma and EMT-6 breast cancer were made drug resistant before therapy, the antiangiogenic schedule suppressed tumor growth 3-fold more effectively than the conventional schedule. When another angiogenesis inhibitor, TNP-470, was added to the antiangiogenic schedule of cyclophosphamide, drug-resistant Lewis lung carcinomas were eradicated. Each dose of the antiangiogenic schedule of cyclophosphamide induced the apoptosis of endothelial cells within tumors, and endothelial cell apoptosis preceded the apoptosis of drug-resistant tumor cells. This antiangiogenic effect was more pronounced in p53-null mice in which the apoptosis of p53-null endothelial cells induced by cyclophosphamide was so vigorous that drug-resistant tumors comprising 4.5% of body weight were eradicated. Thus, by using a dosing schedule of cyclophosphamide that provided more sustained apoptosis of endothelial cells within the vascular bed of a tumor, we show that a chemotherapeutic agent can more effectively control tumor growth in mice, regardless of whether the tumor cells are drug resistant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                29 April 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 4
                : e0124889
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departments of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Veterinary Medicine, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America
                [3 ]Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                [4 ]Hope Veterinary Specialists, Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                [5 ]Veterinary Cancer Group, Tustin, California, United States of America
                [6 ]Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
                [7 ]Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
                [8 ]New England Veterinary Oncology Group, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [9 ]Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America
                [10 ]Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
                [11 ]Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America
                [12 ]Oradell Animal Hospital, Paramus, New Jersey, United States of America
                [13 ]Southeast Veterinary Oncology and Medicine, Orange Park, Florida, United States of America
                [14 ]Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
                [15 ]Sage Centers for Veterinary Specialty and Emergency Care, Concord, California, United States of America
                [16 ]VCA Katonah Bedford Veterinary Center, Bedford Hill, New York, United States of America
                [17 ]Southwest Veterinary Oncology, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
                [18 ]Veterinary Specialty Hospital of the Carolinas, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America
                [19 ]Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America
                [20 ]Veterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
                [21 ]The Veterinary Cancer Center, Norwalk, Connecticut, United States of America
                Institut Albert Bonniot-INSERMU823, FRANCE
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: CL, CC, MR, DV, MK, DT received honoraria paid by Zoetis. Several of the authors are employed by private veterinary practices that participated in this clinical trial: Hope Veterinary Specialists, Veterinary Cancer Group, New England Veterinary Oncology Group, Oradell Animal Hospital, Southeast Veterinary Oncology and Medicine, Sage Centers for Veterinary Specialty and Emergency Care, VCA Katonah Bedford Veterinary Center, Southwest Veterinary Oncology, Veterinary Specialty Hospital of the Carolinas and Veterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego. There are no competing interests and no additional financial disclosures to report as a result of these affiliations. Therefore, this does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CAL. Performed the experiments: CAL HLG RP MLP CAC MPR DMV LEW KLC HW-R AB CJH DBB JL NCN MC-J VLG MKK DMR DHT BP GP. Analyzed the data: CAL HLG MLP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MLP. Wrote the paper: CAL HLG MLP. Organized and quality check on data entry: TM NS.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-43240
                10.1371/journal.pone.0124889
                4414350
                25923466
                1c2e496a-4bbc-44f6-9081-289428e904ae
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 6 October 2014
                : 18 March 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 17
                Funding
                This project was supported by the following grants: UL1TR001070 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and P30CA016058 from the National Cancer Institute to The Ohio State University. Funding for this clinical trial and the toceranib for treated dogs was provided by Zoetis. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article