3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression Predict Outcome After Programmed Death 1 Blockade in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells evade antitumor immunity by multiple means, including gains of 9p24.1/ CD274(PD-L1)/ PDCD1LG2(PD-L2) and perturbed antigen presentation. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor blockade is active in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) despite reported deficiencies of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I expression on HRS cells. Herein, we assess bases of sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL who were treated with nivolumab (anti–PD-1) in the CheckMate 205 trial.

          Methods

          HRS cells from archival tumor biopsies were evaluated for 9p24.1 alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization and for expression of PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the antigen presentation pathway components—β2-microglobulin, MHC class I, and MHC class II—by immunohistochemistry. These parameters were correlated with clinical responses and progression-free survival (PFS) after PD-1 blockade.

          Results

          Patients with higher-level 9p24.1 copy gain and increased PD-L1 expression on HRS cells had superior PFS. HRS cell expression of β2-microglobulin/MHC class I was not predictive for complete remission or PFS after nivolumab therapy. In contrast, HRS cell expression of MHC class II was predictive for complete remission. In patients with a > 12-month interval between myeloablative autologous stem-cell transplantation and nivolumab therapy, HRS cell expression of MHC class II was associated with prolonged PFS.

          Conclusion

          Genetically driven PD-L1 expression and MHC class II positivity on HRS cells are potential predictors of favorable outcome after PD-1 blockade. In cHL, clinical responses to nivolumab were not dependent on HRS cell expression of MHC class I.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Clin Oncol
          J. Clin. Oncol
          jco
          jco
          JCO
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          American Society of Clinical Oncology
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          1 April 2018
          2 February 2018
          1 April 2019
          : 36
          : 10
          : 942-950
          Affiliations
          [1]Margaretha G.M. Roemer, Robert A. Redd, Fathima Zumla Cader, Christine J. Pak, Sara Abdelrahman, Jing Ouyang, Philippe Armand, Donna S. Neuberg, and Margaret A. Shipp, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Geraldine S. Pinkus, Azra H. Ligon, and Scott J. Rodig, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Margaretha G.M. Roemer, VU University Medical Center; Jan Paul De Boer, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Lunenburg Phase I/II Consortium, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Stephanie Sasse, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Anas Younes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Fanale, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Armando Santoro, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan; Pier Luigi Zinzani, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; John Timmerman, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Graham P. Collins, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Radhakrishnan Ramchandren, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Jonathon B. Cohen, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John Kuruvilla, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Center for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Marek Trneny, Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Stephen Ansell, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Kazunobu Kato, Benedetto Farsaci, and Anne Sumbul, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Margaret A. Shipp, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Mayer 513, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: margaret_shipp@ 123456dfci.harvard.edu .

          S.J.R. and M.A.S. contributed equally to this article.

          Article
          PMC5877802 PMC5877802 5877802 773994
          10.1200/JCO.2017.77.3994
          5877802
          29394125
          1c2e0e01-653c-4885-af62-24dcbe458d82
          © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
          History
          Page count
          Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 12
          Categories
          HEMA16, Biology & Immunology
          HEMA17, Translational Oncology
          TO6, Immunology/Immunobiology
          TO19, Hematologic
          Rapid Communication
          Immunotherapy
          Custom metadata
          v1

          Comments

          Comment on this article