24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of initial and tertiary centre second opinion reads of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate prior to repeat biopsy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To investigate the value of second-opinion evaluation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by subspecialised uroradiologists at a tertiary centre for the detection of significant cancer in transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.

          Methods

          Evaluation of prospectively acquired initial and second-opinion radiology reports of 158 patients who underwent MRI at regional hospitals prior to transperineal MR/untrasound fusion biopsy at a tertiary referral centre over a 3-year period. Gleason score (GS) 7-10 cancer, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value (±95 % confidence intervals) were calculated and compared by Fisher’s exact test.

          Results

          Disagreement between initial and tertiary centre second-opinion reports was observed in 54 % of cases (86/158). MRIs had a higher NPV for GS 7-10 in tertiary centre reads compared to initial reports (0.89 ± 0.08 vs 0.72 ± 0.16; p = 0.04), and a higher PPV in the target area for all cancer (0.61 ± 0.12 vs 0.28 ± 0.10; p = 0.01) and GS 7-10 cancer (0.43 ± 0.12 vs 0.2 3 ± 0.09; p = 0.02). For equivocal suspicion, the PPV for GS 7-10 was 0.12 ± 0.11 for tertiary centre and 0.11 ± 0.09 for initial reads; p = 1.00.

          Conclusions

          Second readings of prostate MRI by subspecialised uroradiologists at a tertiary centre significantly improved both NPV and PPV. Reporter experience may help to reduce overcalling and avoid overtargeting of lesions.

          Key Points

          Multiparametric MRIs were more often called negative in subspecialist reads (41 % vs 20 %) .

          Second readings of prostate mpMRIs by subspecialist uroradiologists significantly improved NPV and PPV .

          Reporter experience may reduce overcalling and avoid overtargeting of lesions.

          Greater education and training of radiologists in prostate MRI interpretation is advised.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4635-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.

            Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) is increasingly used in prostate cancer (CaP). Understanding the limitations of tumor detection, particularly in multifocal disease, is important in its clinical application.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy?

              The use of MRI in prostate cancer management is controversial and current guidelines underplay its role. Technological advances over the past 5 years, however, demand a re-evaluation of this position. In this article, we propose an increased use of MRI, not only in those with a diagnosis of prostate cancer but also for men before a prostate biopsy. The use of MRI before a biopsy can serve as a triage test in men with raised serum prostate-specific antigen levels, in order to select those for biopsy with significant cancer that requires treatment. This strategy could avoid biopsy, and hence unnecessary treatment, in those with no disease or insignificant cancer. In addition, avoidance of postbiopsy artifact caused by hemorrhage will lead to better local staging accuracy, while determining more accurately the disease burden. This approach could improve risk stratification by selecting those who require adjuvant therapy or dose escalation. Furthermore, MRI evaluation of cancer burden could be important in active surveillance regimens to select those needing intervention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                01223 336895 , Tristan.barrett@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
                Journal
                Eur Radiol
                Eur Radiol
                European Radiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0938-7994
                1432-1084
                24 October 2016
                24 October 2016
                2017
                : 27
                : 6
                : 2259-2266
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8653 1507, GRID grid.412301.5, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, , University Hospital RWTH Aachen, ; Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, CamPARI Clinic, , Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, ; Hills Road, CB2 0QQ Cambridge, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, Department of Radiology, , Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, ; Hills Road, CB2 0QQ Cambridge, UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0622 5016, GRID grid.120073.7, Department of Pathology, , Addenbrooke’s Hospital, ; Hills Road, CB2 0QQ Cambridge, UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0622 5016, GRID grid.120073.7, Department of Urology, , Addenbrooke’s Hospital, ; Hills Road, CB2 0QQ Cambridge, UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, Department of Radiology, , University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, ; Box 218, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK
                Article
                4635
                10.1007/s00330-016-4635-5
                5408042
                27778089
                1b9c6d08-2f15-414b-b9ea-c10f30171ba7
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 19 August 2016
                : 18 September 2016
                : 3 October 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007210, RWTH Aachen University;
                Award ID: Medical Rotation Program
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Urogenital
                Custom metadata
                © European Society of Radiology 2017

                Radiology & Imaging
                magnetic resonance imaging,second read,prostate cancer,transperineal prostate biopsy,mr/ultrasound fusion biopsy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content69

                Cited by27

                Most referenced authors436