7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Redesigning surgical decision making for high-risk patients.

      1 , ,
      The New England journal of medicine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992.

          Despite more than three decades of research on iatrogenesis, surgical adverse events have not been subjected to detailed study to identify their characteristics. This information could be invaluable, however, for guiding quality assurance and research efforts aimed at reducing the occurrence of surgical adverse events. Thus we conducted a retrospective chart review of 15,000 randomly selected admissions to Colorado and Utah hospitals during 1992 to identify and analyze these events. We selected a representative sample of hospitals from Utah and Colorado and then randomly sampled 15,000 nonpsychiatric discharges from 1992. With use of a 2-stage record-review process modeled on previous adverse event studies, we estimated the incidence, morbidity, and preventability of surgical adverse events that caused death, disability at the time of discharge, or prolonged hospital stay. We characterized their distribution by type of injury and by physician specialty and determined incidence rates by procedure. Adverse events were no more likely in surgical care than in nonsurgical care. Nonetheless, 66% of all adverse events were surgical, and the annual incidence among hospitalized patients who underwent an operation or child delivery was 3.0% (confidence interval 2.7% to 3.4%). Among surgical adverse events 54% (confidence interval 48.9% to 58.9%) were preventable. We identified 12 common operations with significantly elevated adverse event incidence rates that ranged from 4.4% for hysterectomy (confidence interval 2.9% to 6.8%) to 18.9% for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (confidence interval 8.3% to 37.5%). Eight operations also carried a significantly higher risk of a preventable adverse event: lower extremity bypass graft (11.0%), abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (8.1%), colon resection (5.9%), coronary artery bypass graft/cardiac valve surgery (4.7%), transurethral resection of the prostate or of a bladder tumor (3.9%), cholecystectomy (3.0%), hysterectomy (2.8%), and appendectomy (1.5%). Among all surgical adverse events, 5.6% (confidence interval 3.7% to 8.3%) resulted in death, accounting for 12.2% (confidence interval 6.9% to 21.4%) of all hospital deaths in Utah and Colorado. Technique-related complications, wound infections, and postoperative bleeding produced nearly half of all surgical adverse events. These findings provide direction for research to identify the causes of surgical adverse events and for targeted quality improvement efforts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The intensity and variation of surgical care at the end of life: a retrospective cohort study.

            Although the extent of hospital and intensive-care use at the end of life is well known, patterns of surgical care during this period are poorly understood. We examined national patterns of surgical care in the USA among elderly fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in their last year of life. We did a retrospective cohort study of elderly beneficiaries of fee-for-service Medicare in the USA, aged 65 years or older, who died in 2008. We identified claims for inpatient surgical procedures in the year before death and examined the relation between receipt of an inpatient procedure and both age and geographical region. We calculated an end-of-life surgical intensity (EOLSI) score for each hospital referral region defined as proportion of decedents who underwent a surgical procedure during the year before their death, adjusted for age, sex, race, and income. We compared patient characteristics with Rao-Scott χ(2) tests, resource use with generalised estimating equations, regional differences with generalised estimating equations Wald tests, and end-of-life surgical intensity scores with Spearman's partial-rank-order correlation coefficients. Of 1,802,029 elderly beneficiaries of fee-for-service Medicare who died in 2008, 31·9% (95% CI 31·9-32·0; 575,596 of 1,802,029) underwent an inpatient surgical procedure during the year before death, 18·3% (18·2-18·4; 329,771 of 1,802,029) underwent a procedure in their last month of life, and 8·0% (8·0-8·1; 144,162 of 1,802,029) underwent a procedure during their last week of life. Between the ages of 80 and 90 years, the percentage of decedents undergoing a surgical procedure in the last year of life decreased by 33% (35·3% [95% CI 34·7-35·9; 8858 of 25,094] to 23·6% [22·9-24·3; 3340 of 14,152]). EOLSI score in the highest intensity region (Munster, IN) was 34·4 (95% CI 33·7-35·1) and in the lowest intensity region (Honolulu, HI) was 11·5 (11·3-11·7). Regions with a high number of hospital beds per head had high end-of-life surgical intensity (r=0·37, 95% CI 0·27-0·46; p<0·0001), as did regions with high total Medicare spending (r=0·50, 0·41-0·58; p<0·0001). Many elderly people in the USA undergo surgery in the year before their death. The rate at which they undergo surgery varies substantially with age and region and might suggest discretion in health-care providers' decisions to intervene surgically at the end of life. None. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional status after colon cancer surgery in elderly nursing home residents.

              To determine functional status and mortality rates after colon cancer surgery in older nursing home residents. Retrospective cohort study. Nursing homes in the United States. Six thousand eight hundred twenty-two nursing home residents aged 65 and older who underwent surgery for colon cancer in the United States between 1999 and 2005. Changes in functional status were assessed before and after surgery using the Minimum Data Set Activity of Daily Living (MDS-ADL) summary scale, a 28-point scale in which score increases as functional dependence increases. Regression techniques were used to identify patient characteristics associated with mortality and functional decline 1 year after surgery. On average, residents who underwent colectomy had a 3.9-point worsening in MDS-ADL score at 1 year. One year after surgery, rates of mortality and sustained functional decline were 53% and 24%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, older age (≥ 80 vs 65-69, adjusted relative risk (ARR) = 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-2.04, P < .001), readmission after surgical hospitalization (ARR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03-1.29, P = .02), surgical complications (ARR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.21, P = .01), and functional decline before surgery (ARR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.11-1.32, P < .001) were associated with functional decline at 1 year. Mortality and sustained functional decline are common after colon cancer surgery in nursing home residents. Initiatives aimed at improving surgical outcomes are needed in this vulnerable population. © 2012, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2012, The American Geriatrics Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                N. Engl. J. Med.
                The New England journal of medicine
                1533-4406
                0028-4793
                Apr 10 2014
                : 370
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ] From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY (L.G.G.); the Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical College, Burlington (T.M.O.); and the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (M.D.N.).
                Article
                NIHMS666070
                10.1056/NEJMp1315538
                24716679
                1b8082d5-3c7c-48fc-81ea-6e3606dc7151
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article