4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CRPS Is Not Associated with Altered Sensorimotor Cortex GABA or Glutamate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating chronic pain disorder typically in the upper or lower limbs. While CRPS usually develops from a peripheral event, it is likely maintained by CNS changes. Indeed, CRPS is reported to be associated with sensorimotor cortex changes, or functional “reorganization,” as well as deficits such as poor tactile acuity. While the mechanisms underpinning cortical reorganization in CRPS are unknown, some have hypothesized that it involves disinhibition (i.e., a reduction in GABA activity). In this study, we addressed this hypothesis by using edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy to determine sensorimotor GABA and glutamate concentrations in 16 humans with CRPS and 30 matched control subjects and the relationship of these concentrations with tactile acuity. We found that individuals with upper limb CRPS displayed reduced tactile acuity in the painful hand, compared with the nonpainful hand and pain-free control subjects. Despite this acuity deficit, CRPS was not associated with altered GABA or glutamate concentrations within the sensorimotor cortex on either the side that represents the affected or unaffected hand. Furthermore, there was no significant relationship between sensorimotor GABA or glutamate concentrations and tactile acuity in CRPS subjects or control subjects. Although our sample was small, these data suggest that CRPS is not associated with altered total sensorimotor GABA or glutamate concentrations. While these results are at odds with the sensorimotor cortex disinhibition hypothesis, it is possible that GABAergic mechanisms other than total GABA concentration may contribute to such disinhibition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          TMS and drugs revisited 2014.

          The combination of pharmacology and transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the effects of drugs on TMS-evoked EMG responses (pharmaco-TMS-EMG) has considerably improved our understanding of the effects of TMS on the human brain. Ten years have elapsed since an influential review on this topic has been published in this journal (Ziemann, 2004). Since then, several major developments have taken place: TMS has been combined with EEG to measure TMS evoked responses directly from brain activity rather than by motor evoked potentials in a muscle, and pharmacological characterization of the TMS-evoked EEG potentials, although still in its infancy, has started (pharmaco-TMS-EEG). Furthermore, the knowledge from pharmaco-TMS-EMG that has been primarily obtained in healthy subjects is now applied to clinical settings, for instance, to monitor or even predict clinical drug responses in neurological or psychiatric patients. Finally, pharmaco-TMS-EMG has been applied to understand the effects of CNS active drugs on non-invasive brain stimulation induced long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity. This is a new field that may help to develop rationales of pharmacological treatment for enhancement of recovery and re-learning after CNS lesions. This up-dated review will highlight important knowledge and recent advances in the contribution of pharmaco-TMS-EMG and pharmaco-TMS-EEG to our understanding of normal and dysfunctional excitability, connectivity and plasticity of the human brain. Copyright © 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Role of GABA in Human Motor Learning

            Results There is considerable variability in motor learning behavior across individuals [7], and the present study aimed to test whether some of this variability could be explained by variation in responsiveness of the GABA system, because GABA modulation plays an important role in learning [1–4]. As a measure of GABA responsiveness, we used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to quantify changes in GABA concentration following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive technique that decreases GABA within the motor cortex [5], increases cortical excitability [8], and enhances short-term learning [9]. We predicted that individuals who show less tDCS-mediated GABA modulation would show less behavioral evidence of motor learning and less modulation of fMRI responses during learning. Subjects participated in three experimental sessions on different days. The first two sessions were MRS sessions, during which GABA-edited spectra were acquired before and after 10 min of tDCS. In the third session, subjects performed an explicit sequence learning task during fMRI, and no tDCS was applied. Motor Behavior Motor learning was assessed via change in reaction times to a visually cued explicit sequence learning task performed with the four fingers of the right hand during fMRI acquisition in session 3. All subjects showed a significant reduction in reaction times across successive learning blocks (Figure 1A; repeated-measures analysis of variance, main effect of BLOCK F(15,150) = 19.95; p  2.0 and a (corrected) cluster significance threshold of p = 0.01.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA.

              There is increasing interest in the use of edited proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the detection of GABA in the human brain. At a recent meeting held at Cardiff University, a number of spectroscopy groups met to discuss the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of GABA-edited MR spectra. This paper aims to set out the issues discussed at this meeting, reporting areas of consensus around parameters and procedures in the field and highlighting those areas where differences remain. It is hoped that this paper can fulfill two needs, providing a summary of the current 'state-of-the-art' in the field of GABA-edited MRS at 3T using MEGA-PRESS and a basic guide to help researchers new to the field to avoid some of the pitfalls inherent in the acquisition and processing of edited MRS for GABA. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                24 January 2020
                14 February 2020
                Jan-Feb 2020
                : 7
                : 1
                : ENEURO.0389-19.2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anatomy and Histology, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney , Sydney 2006, Australia
                [2 ]Neuroscience Research Australia , Sydney 2031, Australia
                [3 ]School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University , Perth 6102, Australia
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: L.A.H. and F.D.P. designed research; B.L., L.A.H., and F.D.P. performed research; C.D.R. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; B.L., C.D.R., and F.D.P. analyzed data; B.L., L.A.H., C.D.R., and F.D.P. wrote the paper.

                This research was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Early Career Fellowship ID1091415, a University of Sydney Medical School Kickstart Grant, a NWG Macintosh Memorial Grant, and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Grant ID1130280.

                Correspondence should be addressed to Luke A. Henderson at luke.henderson@ 123456sydney.edu.au .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-660X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1026-0151
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-0805
                Article
                eN-NRS-0389-19
                10.1523/ENEURO.0389-19.2020
                7029188
                31980452
                1b5863ba-f353-43ca-bfd6-9da7ff125e10
                Copyright © 2020 Lee et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 26 September 2019
                : 9 January 2020
                : 10 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 63, Pages: 12, Words: 00
                Funding
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/501100000925Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
                Award ID: 1091415
                Award ID: 1130280
                Funded by: NWG Macintosh Memorial Grant
                Funded by: University of Sydney Kickstart Grant
                Categories
                3
                Research Article: Negative Results
                Disorders of the Nervous System
                Custom metadata
                January/February 2020

                chronic pain,cortical reorganization,gaba,glutamate,inhibition,sensorimotor cortex

                Comments

                Comment on this article