6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development of an Extended ASM3 Model for Predicting the Nitrous Oxide Emissions in a Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plant

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An Activated Sludge Model #3 (ASM3) based, pseudomechanistic model describing nitrous oxide (N 2O) production was created in this study to provide more insight into the dynamics of N 2O production, consumption, and emissions at a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). N 2O emissions at the studied WWTP are monitored throughout the plant with a Fourier transform infrared analyzer, while the developed model encountered N 2O production in the biological reactors via both ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) nitrification and heterotrophic denitrifiers. Additionally, the stripping of N 2O was included by applying a K L a-based approach that has not been widely used before. The objective was to extend the existing ASM3-based model of the plant and assess how well the full-scale emissions could be predicted with the selected model. The validity and applicability of the model were tested by comparing the simulation results with the comprehensive online data. The results show that the ASM3-based model can be successfully extended and applied to modeling N 2O production and emissions at a full-scale WWTP. These results demonstrate that the biological reactor can explain most of the N 2O emissions at the plant, but a significant proportion of the liquid-phase N 2O is further transferred during the process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment.

          Nitrous oxide (N(2)O), a potent greenhouse gas, can be emitted during wastewater treatment, significantly contributing to the greenhouse gas footprint. Measurements at lab-scale and full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have demonstrated that N(2)O can be emitted in substantial amounts during nitrogen removal in WWTPs, however, a large variation in reported emission values exists. Analysis of literature data enabled the identification of the most important operational parameters leading to N(2)O emission in WWTPs: (i) low dissolved oxygen concentration in the nitrification and denitrification stages, (ii) increased nitrite concentrations in both nitrification and denitrification stages, and (iii) low COD/N ratio in the denitrification stage. From the literature it remains unclear whether nitrifying or denitrifying microorganisms are the main source of N(2)O emissions. Operational strategies to prevent N(2)O emission from WWTPs are discussed and areas in which further research is urgently required are identified.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            N2O emissions from activated sludge processes, 2008-2009: results of a national monitoring survey in the United States.

            Despite recognition of the possible role of biological nitrogen removal (BNR) processes in nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emission, a measured database of N(2)O emissions from these processes at the national scale does not currently exist. This study focused on the quantification of N(2)O emissions at 12 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across the United States using a newly developed U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) reviewed protocol. A high degree of variability in field-scale measurements of N(2)O was observed, both across the WWTPs sampled and within each WWTP. Additionally, aerobic zones, which have hitherto not been considered in the USEPA approach of estimating N(2)O emissions, generally contributed more to N(2)O fluxes than anoxic zones from BNR reactors. These results severely qualify the conventional use of a single emission factor to "estimate" N(2)O emissions from BNR processes, solely by virtue of denitrification. Upon subjecting the nationwide data set to multivariate regression data mining, high nitrite, ammonium, and dissolved oxygen concentrations were positively correlated with N(2)O emissions from aerobic zones of activated sludge reactors. On the other hand, high nitrite and dissolved oxygen concentrations were positively correlated with N(2)O emissions from anoxic zones. Based on these results, it can be argued that activated sludge processes that minimize transient or permanent build up of ammonium or nitrite, especially in the presence of dissolved oxygen, are expected to have low N(2)O emissions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nitrous oxide generation in full-scale biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants.

              International guidance for estimating emissions of the greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N(2)O), from biological nutrient removal (BNR) wastewater systems is presently inadequate. This study has adopted a rigorous mass balance approach to provide comprehensive N(2)O emission and formation results from seven full-scale BNR wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). N(2)O formation was shown to be always positive, yet highly variable across the seven plants. The calculated range of N(2)O generation was 0.006-0.253 kgN(2)O-Nper kgN denitrified (average: 0.035+/-0.027). This paper investigated the possible mechanisms of N(2)O formation, rather than the locality of emissions. Higher N(2)O generation was shown to generally correspond with higher nitrite concentrations, but with many competing and parallel nitrogen transformation reactions occurring, it was very difficult to clearly identify the predominant mechanism of N(2)O production. The WWTPs designed and operated for low effluent TN (i.e. <10 mgN L(-1)) had lower and less variable N(2)O generation factors than plants that only achieved partial denitrification.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Sci Technol
                Environ. Sci. Technol
                es
                esthag
                Environmental Science & Technology
                American Chemical Society
                0013-936X
                1520-5851
                18 April 2018
                15 May 2018
                : 52
                : 10
                : 5803-5811
                Affiliations
                []Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority , P.O. Box 100, FI-00066 HSY, Helsinki, Finland
                []Department of Built Environment, Aalto University , P.O. Box 15200, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
                [§ ]Urban Water Management and Environmental Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
                []Department of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará , Campus of Pici, Fortaleza (Ceará), 60020-181, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]E-mail address: anna.mikola@ 123456aalto.fi .
                Article
                10.1021/acs.est.8b00386
                6150676
                29668272
                1b2f7d60-2140-4149-ac30-fa383f704c24
                Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

                This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.

                History
                : 22 January 2018
                : 18 April 2018
                : 05 April 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                es8b00386
                es-2018-00386h

                General environmental science
                General environmental science

                Comments

                Comment on this article